• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混乱但值得:以人为中心的设计在成功的疫苗推广活动中的应用。

Messy but worth it: human-centred design as applied within a successful vaccine-promotive campaign.

机构信息

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine - Department of Health, Muntinlupa City, Metro Manila, Philippines.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jul 29;9(7):e014870. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014870.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014870
PMID:39074904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11288141/
Abstract

Human-centred design (HCD) is an approach to problem-solving that prioritises understanding and meeting the needs of the end-users. Researchers and designers practice empathic listening as users share their perspectives, thereby enabling a variety of stakeholders to cocreate effective solutions. While a valuable and, in theory, straightforward process, HCD in practice can be chaotic: Practitioners often struggle to navigate an excess of (often conflicting) ideas and to strike a balance between problem-understanding and problem-solving. In this practice paper, we outline our own experiences with HCD, which ultimately resulted in the development of a successful video-based intervention to bolster vaccine confidence in the Philippines. We highlight the use of 'radical circles' to overcome roadblocks and navigate tensions. Radical circles entail groups of individuals with divergent opinions and identities engaging in critical analysis of a given idea, actively challenging standard ways of thinking, and ultimately, generating solutions. Employing radical circles enabled us to innovate and adapt to new perspectives that emerged along the non-linear HCD pathway. Our incorporation of radical circles into HCD methodology demonstrates its potential as a powerful complementary step in the meaning-making process. In our view, radical circles could enrich HCD processes and provide a solution to design overcrowding, leading to meaningful, transformative and successful interventions.

摘要

以人为中心的设计(HCD)是一种解决问题的方法,它优先考虑理解和满足最终用户的需求。研究人员和设计师在用户分享他们的观点时进行同理心倾听,从而使各种利益相关者能够共同创造有效的解决方案。虽然这是一个有价值的、理论上简单的过程,但 HCD 在实践中可能会很混乱:从业者经常难以驾驭过多的(通常是相互冲突的)想法,并在理解问题和解决问题之间取得平衡。在这篇实践论文中,我们概述了我们自己在 HCD 方面的经验,最终开发了一个成功的基于视频的干预措施,以增强菲律宾的疫苗信心。我们强调了使用“激进圈”来克服障碍和应对紧张局势。激进圈涉及具有不同意见和身份的个人群体,对给定的想法进行批判性分析,积极挑战标准思维方式,最终产生解决方案。采用激进圈使我们能够创新并适应 HCD 非线性路径中出现的新视角。我们将激进圈纳入 HCD 方法学中,展示了其作为意义创造过程中有力的补充步骤的潜力。在我们看来,激进圈可以丰富 HCD 流程,并为解决设计过度拥挤问题提供解决方案,从而实现有意义、变革性和成功的干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe8/11288141/1a41dd2604ac/bmjgh-9-7-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe8/11288141/b315d1f1497d/bmjgh-9-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe8/11288141/7819ab438eca/bmjgh-9-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe8/11288141/fa7a2b4a57a8/bmjgh-9-7-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe8/11288141/1a41dd2604ac/bmjgh-9-7-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe8/11288141/b315d1f1497d/bmjgh-9-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe8/11288141/7819ab438eca/bmjgh-9-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe8/11288141/fa7a2b4a57a8/bmjgh-9-7-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe8/11288141/1a41dd2604ac/bmjgh-9-7-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Messy but worth it: human-centred design as applied within a successful vaccine-promotive campaign.混乱但值得:以人为中心的设计在成功的疫苗推广活动中的应用。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jul 29;9(7):e014870. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014870.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Engaging Cancer Care Physicians in Off-Label Drug Clinical Trials: Human-Centered Design Approach.让癌症护理医生参与非标签药物临床试验:以人为本的设计方法。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 15;8:e51604. doi: 10.2196/51604.
4
An advance care plan decision support video before major surgery: a patient- and family-centred approach.重大手术前的预先护理计划决策支持视频:以患者和家庭为中心的方法。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Jun;8(2):229-236. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001449. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
5
The Application of Human-Centered Design Approaches in Health Research and Innovation: A Narrative Review of Current Practices.以人为本的设计方法在健康研究和创新中的应用:当前实践的叙述性综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 6;9(12):e28102. doi: 10.2196/28102.
6
Enhancing Human-Centered Design With Youth-Led Participatory Action Research Approaches for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Programming.通过以青年为主导的参与式行动研究方法加强以青少年性与生殖健康规划为重点的以人为本设计。
Health Promot Pract. 2022 Jan;23(1):25-31. doi: 10.1177/15248399211003544. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
Engaging a community to focus on upper limb function in people with multiple sclerosis: the ThinkHand campaign case study.动员社区关注多发性硬化症患者的上肢功能:“思考手部”运动案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 18;10(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00586-y.
8
Integrating Human-Centered Design to Advance Global Health: Lessons From 3 Programs.融入以人为中心的设计理念以推进全球健康:来自 3 个项目的经验教训。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Nov 29;9(Suppl 2):S261-S273. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00279.
9
Nurses' and clients' perspectives after engagement in the co-designing of solutions to improve provider-client relationships in maternal and child healthcare: a human-centered design study in rural Tanzania.护士与服务对象参与共同设计改善母婴保健中服务提供者与服务对象关系的解决方案后的观点:坦桑尼亚农村地区的一项以人为本的设计研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 2;23(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01808-0.
10
Human-Centered Design of a Digital Health Tool to Promote Effective Self-care in Patients With Heart Failure: Mixed Methods Study.以患者为中心设计促进心力衰竭患者有效自我护理的数字健康工具:混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 10;6(5):e34257. doi: 10.2196/34257.

引用本文的文献

1
A Conceptual Model for Strengthening Family Capabilities Through a Process of Care.通过护理过程增强家庭能力的概念模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jul 20;22(7):1150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22071150.
2
Using Human-Centered Design to Bridge Zero-Dose Vaccine Gap: A Case Study of Ilala District in Tanzania.运用以人为本的设计缩小零剂量疫苗差距:以坦桑尼亚伊拉拉区为例
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jan 6;13(1):38. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13010038.

本文引用的文献

1
Conflicting and complementary notions of responsibility in caregiver's and health care workers' vaccination narratives in the Philippines.菲律宾照顾者和医护人员疫苗接种叙述中的责任冲突和互补观念。
J Glob Health. 2024 Jan 12;14:04016. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04016.
2
Keeping the Customer Satisfied: Applying a Kano Model to Improve Vaccine Promotion in the Philippines.保持顾客满意:应用卡诺模型改进菲律宾的疫苗推广。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023 Dec 22;11(6). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00199.
3
Human-centred design bolsters vaccine confidence in the Philippines: results of a randomised controlled trial.
以人文本的设计增强了菲律宾人对疫苗的信心:一项随机对照试验的结果。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012613.
4
Bargaining and gendered authority: a framework to understand household decision-making about childhood vaccines in the Philippines.讨价还价与性别权力:理解菲律宾家庭中儿童疫苗接种决策的框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Sep;7(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009781.
5
Misinformation, infighting, backlash, and an 'endless' recovery; policymakers recount challenges and mitigating measures after a vaccine scare in the Philippines.错误信息、内斗、反弹和“无尽”的恢复;菲律宾疫苗恐慌后,政策制定者讲述挑战和缓解措施。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2077536. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2077536.
6
Scared, powerless, insulted and embarrassed: hesitancy towards vaccines among caregivers in Cavite Province, the Philippines.害怕、无力、受辱和尴尬:菲律宾卡维特省照顾者对接种疫苗的犹豫。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006529.
7
Public trust and the COVID-19 vaccination campaign: lessons from the Philippines as it emerges from the Dengvaxia controversy.公众信任与 COVID-19 疫苗接种运动:菲律宾走出 Dengvaxia 争议的经验教训。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Nov;36(6):2048-2055. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3297. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
'Unfocused groups': lessons learnt amid remote focus groups in the Philippines.“无焦点群体”:菲律宾远程焦点小组的经验教训。
Fam Med Community Health. 2021 Aug;9(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001098.
9
Ten lessons learnt: scaling and transitioning one of the largest mobile health communication programmes in the world to a national government.十大经验教训:将世界上最大的移动健康传播项目之一扩展并过渡到国家政府层面。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(Suppl 5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005341.
10
Research methods from human-centered design: Potential applications in pharmacy and health services research.以人为中心的设计研究方法:在药学和卫生服务研究中的潜在应用。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Dec;17(12):2036-2043. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jun 26.