• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以人文本的设计增强了菲律宾人对疫苗的信心:一项随机对照试验的结果。

Human-centred design bolsters vaccine confidence in the Philippines: results of a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine - Department of Health, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012613.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012613
PMID:37865401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10603469/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The public's confidence in vaccinations has eroded, and anti-vaccination movements have gained traction around the world, including in the Philippines. 'Salubong', a Filipino term, refers to welcoming someone back into one's life and elicits ideas about friendship and family relationships. We extended this concept to vaccines in efforts to design an intervention that would re-welcome vaccines into homes.

METHODS

Using human-centred design, we developed and refined a story-based intervention that engages Filipino families, community leaders and community health workers. We conducted a randomised controlled trial among 719 caregivers of small children to test the developed intervention against a control video. We assessed the binary improvement (improvement vs no improvement) and the amount of improvement in vaccine attitudes and intentions after intervention exposure.

RESULTS

Although the intervention group began with marginally higher baseline vaccine attitude scores, we found that 62% of the intervention group improved their vaccine attitude scores versus 37% of the control group (Fisher's exact, p<0.001). Among individuals whose scores improved after watching the assigned video, the intervention group saw higher mean attitude score improvements on the 5-point scale (Cohen's d=0.32 with 95% CI 0.10 to 0.54, two-sided t-test, p<0.01). We observed similar patterns among participants who stated that they had previously delayed or refused a vaccine for their child: 67% of 74 in the intervention group improved their vaccine attitude scores versus 42% of 54 in the control group (Fisher's exact, p<0.001). Among the subset of these individuals whose scores improved after watching the assigned video, the intervention group saw higher mean attitude score improvements on the 5-point scale that were marginally significant (Cohen's d=0.35 with 95% CI -0.01 to 0.70, two-sided t-test, p=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide solid evidence for the potential of co-designed vaccine confidence campaigns and regulations.

摘要

背景

公众对疫苗的信心已经减弱,反疫苗运动在全球范围内兴起,包括在菲律宾。“Salubong”是一个菲律宾术语,指的是欢迎某人回到自己的生活中,并引发了关于友谊和家庭关系的想法。我们将这个概念扩展到疫苗上,以设计一种干预措施,将疫苗重新引入家庭。

方法

我们使用以人为中心的设计方法,开发并完善了一种基于故事的干预措施,该措施涉及菲律宾家庭、社区领袖和社区卫生工作者。我们在 719 名幼儿照顾者中进行了一项随机对照试验,以测试开发的干预措施与对照视频相比的效果。我们评估了干预暴露后疫苗态度和意图的二元改善(改善与未改善)和改善程度。

结果

尽管干预组在疫苗态度得分方面的基线略高,但我们发现,与对照组(Fisher 精确检验,p<0.001)相比,62%的干预组改善了他们的疫苗态度得分。在观看指定视频后分数提高的个体中,干预组在 5 分制上的平均态度得分提高幅度更高(Cohen's d=0.32,95%置信区间为 0.10 至 0.54,双侧 t 检验,p<0.01)。我们在那些表示之前曾延迟或拒绝为孩子接种疫苗的参与者中观察到类似的模式:干预组中 74 名参与者中有 67%改善了他们的疫苗态度得分,而对照组中 54 名参与者中有 42%(Fisher 精确检验,p<0.001)。在观看指定视频后分数提高的这些个体中,干预组在 5 分制上的平均态度得分提高幅度更高,但在统计学上无显著意义(Cohen's d=0.35,95%置信区间为-0.01 至 0.70,双侧 t 检验,p=0.06)。

结论

我们的结果为精心设计的疫苗信心运动和法规提供了有力的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/29e84be494d1/bmjgh-2023-012613f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/ea5202a99fdd/bmjgh-2023-012613f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/90f6d631c267/bmjgh-2023-012613f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/0dbc5d6d8cd3/bmjgh-2023-012613f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/b76f6e5aa2d8/bmjgh-2023-012613f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/0cd525d805f3/bmjgh-2023-012613f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/50e1a5bd3cef/bmjgh-2023-012613f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/75889d6f642d/bmjgh-2023-012613f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/29e84be494d1/bmjgh-2023-012613f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/ea5202a99fdd/bmjgh-2023-012613f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/90f6d631c267/bmjgh-2023-012613f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/0dbc5d6d8cd3/bmjgh-2023-012613f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/b76f6e5aa2d8/bmjgh-2023-012613f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/0cd525d805f3/bmjgh-2023-012613f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/50e1a5bd3cef/bmjgh-2023-012613f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/75889d6f642d/bmjgh-2023-012613f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba9/10603469/29e84be494d1/bmjgh-2023-012613f08.jpg

相似文献

1
Human-centred design bolsters vaccine confidence in the Philippines: results of a randomised controlled trial.以人文本的设计增强了菲律宾人对疫苗的信心:一项随机对照试验的结果。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012613.
2
How can human-centered design build a story-based video intervention that addresses vaccine hesitancy and bolsters vaccine confidence in the Philippines? A mixedmethod protocol for project SALUBONG.以人为中心的设计如何构建一个基于故事的视频干预措施,以解决菲律宾的疫苗犹豫问题并增强疫苗信心?SALUBONG 项目的混合方法方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 9;11(6):e046814. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046814.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Conflicting and complementary notions of responsibility in caregiver's and health care workers' vaccination narratives in the Philippines.菲律宾照顾者和医护人员疫苗接种叙述中的责任冲突和互补观念。
J Glob Health. 2024 Jan 12;14:04016. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04016.
5
The Efficacy of a Brief, Altruism-Eliciting Video Intervention in Enhancing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions Among a Population-Based Sample of Younger Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.简短的利他主义视频干预对增强基于人群的年轻成年人 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿的效果:随机对照试验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 30;8(5):e37328. doi: 10.2196/37328.
6
Interventions aimed at communities to inform and/or educate about early childhood vaccination.针对社区开展的旨在宣传和/或教育幼儿疫苗接种的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 19;2014(11):CD010232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010232.pub2.
7
A video-feedback parenting intervention to prevent enduring behaviour problems in at-risk children aged 12-36 months: the Healthy Start, Happy Start RCT.视频反馈式育儿干预预防 12-36 月龄高危儿童持久行为问题:健康启动,快乐启动 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(29):1-84. doi: 10.3310/hta25290.
8
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
9
Safety and immunogenicity of the Vi-DT typhoid conjugate vaccine in healthy volunteers in Nepal: an observer-blind, active-controlled, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.在尼泊尔健康志愿者中 Vi-DT 伤寒结合疫苗的安全性和免疫原性:一项观察者盲法、主动对照、随机、非劣效性、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;22(4):529-540. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00455-2. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
10
Scared, powerless, insulted and embarrassed: hesitancy towards vaccines among caregivers in Cavite Province, the Philippines.害怕、无力、受辱和尴尬:菲律宾卡维特省照顾者对接种疫苗的犹豫。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006529.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Scalable, Wordless, Short, Animated Storytelling Videos on Flu Vaccine Hesitancy in China: Nationwide, Single-Blind, Parallel-Group, Randomized Controlled Trial.可扩展、无文字、简短动画叙事视频对中国流感疫苗犹豫态度的影响:全国性、单盲、平行组、随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 27;27:e66758. doi: 10.2196/66758.
2
Effects of scalable, wordless, short, animated storytelling videos on hope in China: a nationwide, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.可扩展、无文字、简短的动画叙事视频对中国希望感的影响:一项全国性、单盲、平行组、随机对照试验。
J Glob Health. 2025 Jun 20;15:04140. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04140.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Defining and measuring vaccine hesitancy.定义和测量疫苗犹豫。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Dec;6(12):1609-1610. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01484-7.
2
MomsTalkShots, tailored educational app, improves vaccine attitudes: a randomized controlled trial.MomsTalkShots,一款定制化的教育应用,改善了疫苗态度:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;22(1):2134. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14498-7.
3
Bargaining and gendered authority: a framework to understand household decision-making about childhood vaccines in the Philippines.讨价还价与性别权力:理解菲律宾家庭中儿童疫苗接种决策的框架。
How has co-design been used to address vaccine hesitancy globally? A systematic review.
协同设计如何在全球范围内用于解决疫苗犹豫问题?一项系统综述。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2431380. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2431380. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
4
Messy but worth it: human-centred design as applied within a successful vaccine-promotive campaign.混乱但值得:以人为中心的设计在成功的疫苗推广活动中的应用。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jul 29;9(7):e014870. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014870.
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Sep;7(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009781.
4
The Vaccine-Hesitant Moment. Reply.疫苗犹豫时刻。回应。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 15;387(11):1050-1051. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2210367.
5
Misinformation, infighting, backlash, and an 'endless' recovery; policymakers recount challenges and mitigating measures after a vaccine scare in the Philippines.错误信息、内斗、反弹和“无尽”的恢复;菲律宾疫苗恐慌后,政策制定者讲述挑战和缓解措施。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2077536. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2077536.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of human-centred design for global health interventions: a quantitative framework.以人为中心的全球卫生干预措施的成本效益分析:一种定量框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Mar;7(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007912.
7
Evaluation of a community-based mobile video breastfeeding intervention in Khayelitsha, South Africa: The Philani MOVIE cluster-randomized controlled trial.南非凯萨蒂瓦社区移动视频母乳喂养干预评价:Philani MOVIE 集群随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 28;18(9):e1003744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003744. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
Using a human-centred design approach to develop a comprehensive newborn monitoring chart for inpatient care in Kenya.运用以人文本的设计方法为肯尼亚住院新生儿护理开发综合性监测图。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 24;21(1):1010. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07030-x.
9
Scared, powerless, insulted and embarrassed: hesitancy towards vaccines among caregivers in Cavite Province, the Philippines.害怕、无力、受辱和尴尬:菲律宾卡维特省照顾者对接种疫苗的犹豫。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006529.
10
'Unfocused groups': lessons learnt amid remote focus groups in the Philippines.“无焦点群体”:菲律宾远程焦点小组的经验教训。
Fam Med Community Health. 2021 Aug;9(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001098.