Suppr超能文献

老年人停用阿司匹林的短期和长期影响:一项目标试验模拟。

Short- and long-term impact of aspirin cessation in older adults: a target trial emulation.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2024 Jul 29;22(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03507-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The net benefit of aspirin cessation in older adults remains uncertain. This study aimed to use observational data to emulate a randomized trial of aspirin cessation versus continuation in older adults without cardiovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS

Post hoc analysis using a target trial emulation framework applied to the immediate post-trial period (2017-2021) of a study of low-dose aspirin initiation in adults aged ≥ 70 years (ASPREE; NCT01038583). Participants from Australia and the USA were included if they were free of CVD at the start of the post-trial intervention period (time zero, T0) and had been taking open-label or randomized aspirin immediately before T0. The two groups in the target trial were as follows: aspirin cessation (participants who were taking randomized aspirin immediately before T0; assumed to have stopped at T0 as instructed) versus aspirin continuation (participants on open-label aspirin at T0 regardless of their randomized treatment; assumed to have continued at T0). The outcomes after T0 were incident CVD, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, and major bleeding during 3, 6, and 12 months (short-term) and 48 months (long-term) follow-up. Hazard ratios (HRs) comparing aspirin cessation to continuation were estimated from propensity-score (PS) adjusted Cox proportional-hazards regression models.

RESULTS

We included 6103 CVD-free participants (cessation: 5427, continuation: 676). Over both short- and long-term follow-up, aspirin cessation versus continuation was not associated with elevated risk of CVD, MACE, and all-cause mortality (HRs, at 3 and 48 months respectively, were 1.23 and 0.73 for CVD, 1.11 and 0.84 for MACE, and 0.23 and 0.79 for all-cause mortality, p > 0.05), but cessation had a reduced risk of incident major bleeding events (HRs at 3 and 48 months, 0.16 and 0.63, p < 0.05). Similar findings were seen for all outcomes at 6 and 12 months, except for a lowered risk of all-cause mortality in the cessation group at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that deprescribing prophylactic aspirin might be safe in healthy older adults with no known CVD.

摘要

背景

在老年人中停止使用阿司匹林的净获益仍不确定。本研究旨在使用观察性数据模拟一项在无心血管疾病(CVD)的老年人中停止使用阿司匹林与继续使用阿司匹林的随机试验。

方法

对一项在年龄≥70 岁的成年人中使用低剂量阿司匹林起始治疗的研究(ASPREE;NCT01038583)的即刻 post-trial 期(2017-2021 年)进行事后分析,采用目标试验模拟框架。如果澳大利亚和美国的参与者在 post-trial 干预期开始时(时间零,T0)无 CVD,并且在 T0 前立即服用开放性或随机阿司匹林,则将其纳入研究。目标试验中的两组如下:阿司匹林停药组(在 T0 前立即服用随机阿司匹林的参与者;假设按照指示在 T0 时停药)与阿司匹林继续治疗组(T0 时服用开放性阿司匹林的参与者,无论其随机治疗如何;假设在 T0 时继续服用)。T0 后的结局为新发 CVD、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、全因死亡率和主要出血事件,随访 3、6 和 12 个月(短期)和 48 个月(长期)。使用倾向评分(PS)调整后的 Cox 比例风险回归模型估计阿司匹林停药与继续治疗相比的风险比(HRs)。

结果

我们纳入了 6103 例无 CVD 的参与者(停药组:5427 例,继续治疗组:676 例)。在短期和长期随访中,与继续治疗相比,阿司匹林停药与 CVD、MACE 和全因死亡率的风险增加无关(3 个月和 48 个月的 HR 分别为 1.23 和 0.73 用于 CVD,1.11 和 0.84 用于 MACE,0.23 和 0.79 用于全因死亡率,p>0.05),但停药组新发主要出血事件的风险降低(3 个月和 48 个月的 HR 分别为 0.16 和 0.63,p<0.05)。在 6 个月和 12 个月时,所有结局均观察到类似的发现,除了停药组在 12 个月时全因死亡率风险降低。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在无已知 CVD 的健康老年人中,停止使用预防性阿司匹林可能是安全的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验