School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
BMC Med. 2024 Jul 29;22(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03507-8.
The net benefit of aspirin cessation in older adults remains uncertain. This study aimed to use observational data to emulate a randomized trial of aspirin cessation versus continuation in older adults without cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Post hoc analysis using a target trial emulation framework applied to the immediate post-trial period (2017-2021) of a study of low-dose aspirin initiation in adults aged ≥ 70 years (ASPREE; NCT01038583). Participants from Australia and the USA were included if they were free of CVD at the start of the post-trial intervention period (time zero, T0) and had been taking open-label or randomized aspirin immediately before T0. The two groups in the target trial were as follows: aspirin cessation (participants who were taking randomized aspirin immediately before T0; assumed to have stopped at T0 as instructed) versus aspirin continuation (participants on open-label aspirin at T0 regardless of their randomized treatment; assumed to have continued at T0). The outcomes after T0 were incident CVD, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, and major bleeding during 3, 6, and 12 months (short-term) and 48 months (long-term) follow-up. Hazard ratios (HRs) comparing aspirin cessation to continuation were estimated from propensity-score (PS) adjusted Cox proportional-hazards regression models.
We included 6103 CVD-free participants (cessation: 5427, continuation: 676). Over both short- and long-term follow-up, aspirin cessation versus continuation was not associated with elevated risk of CVD, MACE, and all-cause mortality (HRs, at 3 and 48 months respectively, were 1.23 and 0.73 for CVD, 1.11 and 0.84 for MACE, and 0.23 and 0.79 for all-cause mortality, p > 0.05), but cessation had a reduced risk of incident major bleeding events (HRs at 3 and 48 months, 0.16 and 0.63, p < 0.05). Similar findings were seen for all outcomes at 6 and 12 months, except for a lowered risk of all-cause mortality in the cessation group at 12 months.
Our findings suggest that deprescribing prophylactic aspirin might be safe in healthy older adults with no known CVD.
在老年人中停止使用阿司匹林的净获益仍不确定。本研究旨在使用观察性数据模拟一项在无心血管疾病(CVD)的老年人中停止使用阿司匹林与继续使用阿司匹林的随机试验。
对一项在年龄≥70 岁的成年人中使用低剂量阿司匹林起始治疗的研究(ASPREE;NCT01038583)的即刻 post-trial 期(2017-2021 年)进行事后分析,采用目标试验模拟框架。如果澳大利亚和美国的参与者在 post-trial 干预期开始时(时间零,T0)无 CVD,并且在 T0 前立即服用开放性或随机阿司匹林,则将其纳入研究。目标试验中的两组如下:阿司匹林停药组(在 T0 前立即服用随机阿司匹林的参与者;假设按照指示在 T0 时停药)与阿司匹林继续治疗组(T0 时服用开放性阿司匹林的参与者,无论其随机治疗如何;假设在 T0 时继续服用)。T0 后的结局为新发 CVD、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、全因死亡率和主要出血事件,随访 3、6 和 12 个月(短期)和 48 个月(长期)。使用倾向评分(PS)调整后的 Cox 比例风险回归模型估计阿司匹林停药与继续治疗相比的风险比(HRs)。
我们纳入了 6103 例无 CVD 的参与者(停药组:5427 例,继续治疗组:676 例)。在短期和长期随访中,与继续治疗相比,阿司匹林停药与 CVD、MACE 和全因死亡率的风险增加无关(3 个月和 48 个月的 HR 分别为 1.23 和 0.73 用于 CVD,1.11 和 0.84 用于 MACE,0.23 和 0.79 用于全因死亡率,p>0.05),但停药组新发主要出血事件的风险降低(3 个月和 48 个月的 HR 分别为 0.16 和 0.63,p<0.05)。在 6 个月和 12 个月时,所有结局均观察到类似的发现,除了停药组在 12 个月时全因死亡率风险降低。
我们的研究结果表明,在无已知 CVD 的健康老年人中,停止使用预防性阿司匹林可能是安全的。