Psychotherapy & Movement, Mental Health Care Practice, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI) Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2358683. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2358683. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
There is a vast amount of evidence supporting the effectiveness of trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy in treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, it remains unclear which specific treatment is most effective for patients with PTSD following childhood sexual and physical abuse (CSPA). Although Imaginal Exposure (IE) has proven highly effective in treating PTSD and is widely acknowledged as a standard method, Imagery Rescripting (IR) may be more suitable for CSPA-related PTSD. IR not only addresses fear but also targets other emotions and cognitions associated with childhood maladaptive schemas. Preliminary findings suggest lower drop-out rates for IR compared to IE, but no Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) currently assesses the effectiveness of IR for CSPA-related PTSD. This article presents a study protocol designed to investigate the optimal treatment (IE or IR) for individuals with CSPA-related PTSD and explore predictors of treatment success. In our study protocol, we suggest the inclusion of 173 patients ( = 64 in IR, = 64 in IE, and = 45 in the waitlist condition). The therapy procedures for both IE and IR will consist of 16 sessions lasting 90 min each, with treatment durations of 11 weeks. Measurements take place at baseline, at start of treatment, 11 weeks after the start of treatment (after 16 sessions) and at follow-up at 26 weeks after the last session. A mixed regression will be used to compare the three active conditions before and after measurement. This article serves as a study protocol. The results are not yet available but they will be presented in a subsequent article. This study protocol outlines a RCT which will be the first to provide information on the effectiveness of IR versus IE versus a control group in CSPA-related PTSD. Netherlands Trial Register NTR 4817. Registered 26 September 2014.
有大量证据支持创伤焦点认知行为疗法在治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)方面的有效性。然而,对于儿童期性和身体虐待(CSPA)后患有 PTSD 的患者,哪种特定治疗最有效仍不清楚。虽然想象暴露(IE)已被证明对治疗 PTSD 非常有效,并且被广泛认为是一种标准方法,但意象重述(IR)可能更适合与 CSPA 相关的 PTSD。IR 不仅解决了恐惧问题,还针对与儿童期适应不良模式相关的其他情绪和认知。初步研究结果表明,与 IE 相比,IR 的辍学率较低,但目前尚无随机对照试验(RCT)评估 IR 对与 CSPA 相关的 PTSD 的有效性。本文介绍了一项研究方案,旨在研究针对与 CSPA 相关的 PTSD 的个体的最佳治疗(IE 或 IR),并探讨治疗成功的预测因素。在我们的研究方案中,我们建议纳入 173 名患者(IR 组 64 名,IE 组 64 名,等待组 45 名)。IE 和 IR 的治疗程序均包括 16 次 90 分钟的治疗,治疗持续时间为 11 周。测量在基线时、治疗开始时、治疗开始 11 周后(16 次治疗后)和治疗结束后 26 周的随访时进行。将使用混合回归比较三种积极条件在测量前后的差异。本文作为研究方案。结果尚未公布,但将在后续文章中呈现。本研究方案概述了一项 RCT,这将是首次提供有关 IR 与 IE 与对照组在与 CSPA 相关的 PTSD 中的有效性的信息。荷兰试验注册 NTR 4817。2014 年 9 月 26 日注册。