Carrión-Martínez Aurora, Buckley Benjamin J R, Orenes-Piñero Esteban, Marín Francisco, Lip Gregory Y H, Rivera-Caravaca José Miguel
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, University of Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), CIBERCV, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, L14 3PE Liverpool, UK.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 20;23(12):414. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2312414. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Several anthropometric measurements are used to assess cardiovascular risk and progress during clinical treatment. Most commonly used anthropometric measurements include total body weight and body mass index (BMI), with several other simple anthropometric measures typically underused in clinical practice. Herein, we review the evidence on the relationship between different anthropometric measurements and cardiovascular risk in patients with and without cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Data for this review were identified by searches in PubMed, the Web of Science, Google Scholar, and references from relevant articles by using appropriate and related terms. The last search was performed on June 22, 2022. Articles published in English and Spanish were reviewed and included, if appropriate. We included studies detailing the relationship between skinfolds thickness, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and Conicity index with cardiovascular risk in adults with/without CVD.
In patients from the general population, elevated subscapular and triceps skinfolds showed a positive relationship with the development of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. A higher subscapular skinfold was also associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease and stroke. A higher WHR, as well as other less common anthropometric measurements such as the Conicity index, was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, incident CVD, major adverse cardiovascular events, and mortality in both patients with and without previous CVD.
Non-traditional anthropometric measurements including skinfolds and WHR seem to improve the prediction of cardiovascular risk in the general population, and recurrent events in patients with previous CVD. Use of additional anthropometric techniques according to an objective and standardized method, may aid cardiovascular risk stratification in patients from the general population and the evaluation of therapeutic interventions for patients with CVD.
在临床治疗过程中,几种人体测量方法被用于评估心血管疾病风险及病情进展。最常用的人体测量方法包括总体重和体重指数(BMI),而其他一些简单的人体测量方法在临床实践中通常未得到充分利用。在此,我们综述了不同人体测量方法与有无心血管疾病(CVD)患者心血管疾病风险之间关系的相关证据。
通过在PubMed、科学网、谷歌学术搜索以及使用适当和相关术语从相关文章的参考文献中检索,确定本综述的数据。最后一次检索于2022年6月22日进行。对以英文和西班牙文发表的文章进行了综述,并在适当情况下纳入。我们纳入了详细阐述有无CVD的成年人中皮褶厚度、腰臀比(WHR)和锥度指数与心血管疾病风险之间关系的研究。
在普通人群患者中,肩胛下和肱三头肌皮褶增厚与高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症、心血管疾病死亡率和全因死亡率的发生呈正相关。较高的肩胛下皮褶厚度也与冠状动脉疾病和中风风险增加有关。较高的WHR以及其他不太常见的人体测量指标,如锥度指数,在既往有或无CVD的患者中均与心肌梗死、新发CVD、主要不良心血管事件和死亡率增加有关。
包括皮褶厚度和WHR在内的非传统人体测量方法似乎可以改善对普通人群心血管疾病风险以及既往有CVD患者复发事件的预测。按照客观和标准化方法使用额外的人体测量技术,可能有助于普通人群患者的心血管疾病风险分层以及CVD患者治疗干预措施的评估。