Zhao Yixiao, Hubbard Logan, Malkasian Shant, Abbona Pablo, Bosemani Vijay, Molloi Sabee
Department of Radiological Sciences, Medical Sciences I, University of California, B-140 University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States.
Res Diagn Interv Imaging. 2023 Nov 16;8:100036. doi: 10.1016/j.redii.2023.100036. eCollection 2023 Dec.
To improve the image quality of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) using a patient-specific timing protocol.
A total of 24 swine (48.5 ± 14.3 kg) underwent continuous contrast-enhanced dynamic CT acquisition over 30 s to capture the pulmonary arterial input function (AIF). Multiple contrast injections were made under different cardiac outputs (1.4-5.1 L/min), resulting in a total of 154 AIF curves. The volume scans with maximal enhancement in these AIF curves were retrospectively selected as the reference standard (group A). Two prospective CTPA protocols with bolus-tracking were then simulated using these AIF curves: one used a fixed delay of 5 s between triggering and CTPA acquisition (group B), while the other used a specific delay based on one-half of the contrast injection duration (group C). The mean attenuation, signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) between the three groups were then compared using independent sample -test. Subjective image quality scores were also compared using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
The mean attenuation of pulmonary arteries for group A, B and C (expressed in [HU]) were 870.1 ± 242.5 HU, 761.1 ± 246.7 HU and 825.2 ± 236.8 HU, respectively. The differences in the mean SNR and CNR between Group A and Group C were not significant (SNR: 65.2 vs. 62.4, CNR: 59.6 vs. 56.4, both > 0.05), while Group B was significantly lower than Group A ( < 0.05).
The image quality of CT pulmonary angiography is significantly improved with a timing protocol determined using contrast injection delivery time, as compared with a standard timing protocol with a fixed delay between bolus triggering and image acquisition.
使用针对患者的定时方案提高CT肺动脉造影(CTPA)的图像质量。
共24头猪(体重48.5±14.3千克)在30秒内接受连续对比增强动态CT采集以获取肺动脉输入函数(AIF)。在不同心输出量(1.4 - 5.1升/分钟)下进行多次对比剂注射,共获得154条AIF曲线。将这些AIF曲线中强化程度最大的容积扫描作为参考标准(A组)。然后使用这些AIF曲线模拟两种前瞻性团注追踪CTPA方案:一种在触发与CTPA采集之间使用固定的5秒延迟(B组),另一种根据对比剂注射持续时间的一半使用特定延迟(C组)。然后使用独立样本t检验比较三组之间的平均衰减、信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)。还使用Wilcoxon - Mann - Whitney检验比较主观图像质量评分。
A组、B组和C组肺动脉的平均衰减(以[HU]表示)分别为870.1±242.5 HU、761.1±246.7 HU和825.2±236.8 HU。A组和C组之间平均SNR和CNR的差异不显著(SNR:65.2对62.4,CNR:59.6对56.4,均>0.05),而B组显著低于A组(<0.05)。
与在团注触发和图像采集之间具有固定延迟的标准定时方案相比,使用基于对比剂注射输送时间确定的定时方案可显著提高CT肺动脉造影的图像质量。