van Schaik Carel P, Jacobs Ivo, Burkart Judith M, Sauciuc Gabriela-Alina, Schuppli Caroline, Persson Tomas, Song Zitan
Comparative Socioecology Group, Max Planck Institute for Animal Behavior, Konstanz 78467, Germany.
Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland.
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 May 15;11(5):231541. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231541. eCollection 2024 May.
Brain size variability in primates has been attributed to various domain-specific socio-ecological factors. A recently published large-scale study of short-term memory abilities in 41 primate species (ManyPrimates 2022 9, 428-516. (doi:10.26451/abc.09.04.06.2022)) did not find any correlations with 11 different proxies of external cognitive demands. Here, we found that the interspecific variation in test performance shows correlated evolution with total brain size, with the relationship becoming tighter as species with small sample sizes were successively removed, whereas it was not predicted by the often-used encephalization quotient. In a subsample, we also found that the sizes of brain regions thought to be involved in short-term memory did not predict performance better than overall brain size. The dependence on brain size suggests that domain-general cognitive processes underlie short-term memory as tested by ManyPrimates. These results support the emerging notion that comparative studies of brain size do not generally identify domain-specific cognitive adaptations but rather reveal varying selections on domain-general cognitive abilities. Finally, because attentional processes beyond short-term memory also affect test performance, we suggest that the delayed response test can be refined.
灵长类动物大脑大小的变异性归因于各种特定领域的社会生态因素。最近发表的一项对41种灵长类动物短期记忆能力的大规模研究(ManyPrimates 2022 9, 428 - 516. (doi:10.26451/abc.09.04.06.2022))没有发现与11种不同的外部认知需求指标存在任何相关性。在这里,我们发现测试表现的种间变异与总脑容量呈现出协同进化,随着小样本量物种被相继排除,这种关系变得更加紧密,而常用的脑化商数并不能预测这种关系。在一个子样本中,我们还发现,被认为与短期记忆有关的脑区大小并不能比整体脑容量更好地预测表现。对脑容量的依赖表明,如ManyPrimates所测试的那样,短期记忆背后存在着领域通用的认知过程。这些结果支持了一个新出现的观点,即脑容量的比较研究通常无法识别特定领域的认知适应,而是揭示了对领域通用认知能力的不同选择。最后,由于短期记忆之外的注意力过程也会影响测试表现,我们建议可以改进延迟反应测试。