Fichtel Claudia, Dinter Klara, Kappeler Peter M
Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Leibniz-ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany.
PeerJ. 2020 Sep 24;8:e10025. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10025. eCollection 2020.
Primates have relatively larger brains than other mammals even though brain tissue is energetically costly. Comparative studies of variation in cognitive skills allow testing of evolutionary hypotheses addressing socioecological factors driving the evolution of primate brain size. However, data on cognitive abilities for meaningful interspecific comparisons are only available for haplorhine primates (great apes, Old- and New World monkeys) although strepsirrhine primates (lemurs and lorises) serve as the best living models of ancestral primate cognitive skills, linking primates to other mammals. To begin filling this gap, we tested members of three lemur species () with the Primate Cognition Test Battery, a comprehensive set of experiments addressing physical and social cognitive skills that has previously been used in studies of haplorhines. We found no significant differences in cognitive performance among lemur species and, surprisingly, their average performance was not different from that of haplorhines in many aspects. Specifically, lemurs' overall performance was inferior in the physical domain but matched that of haplorhines in the social domain. These results question a clear-cut link between brain size and cognitive skills, suggesting a more domain-specific distribution of cognitive abilities in primates, and indicate more continuity in cognitive abilities across primate lineages than previously thought.
尽管脑组织消耗能量巨大,但灵长类动物的大脑相对比其他哺乳动物的更大。对认知技能差异的比较研究有助于检验进化假说,这些假说探讨了驱动灵长类动物脑容量进化的社会生态因素。然而,尽管狐猴型灵长类动物(狐猴和懒猴)是灵长类动物祖先认知技能的最佳现存模型,将灵长类动物与其他哺乳动物联系起来,但目前仅能获得关于类人猿灵长类动物(大猩猩、旧世界猴和新世界猴)有意义的种间比较的认知能力数据。为了开始填补这一空白,我们用灵长类动物认知测试组合对三种狐猴物种的成员进行了测试,该测试组合是一组全面的实验,涉及身体和社会认知技能,此前已用于类人猿灵长类动物的研究。我们发现狐猴物种之间在认知表现上没有显著差异,而且令人惊讶的是,它们在许多方面的平均表现与类人猿灵长类动物并无不同。具体而言,狐猴在身体领域的整体表现较差,但在社会领域与类人猿灵长类动物相当。这些结果对脑容量与认知技能之间的明确联系提出了质疑,表明灵长类动物的认知能力分布更具领域特异性,并表明灵长类动物谱系间的认知能力比之前认为的有更多连续性。