• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过屏幕感知他人:视频会议中对个性的第一印象准确且具有规范性吗?

Perceiving Others Through a Screen: Are First Impressions of Personality Accurate and Normative via Videoconferencing?

作者信息

Mignault Marie-Catherine, Tissera Hasagani, Cecere Jamie, Fargnoli-Brown Zoe, Human Lauren

机构信息

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

University of Toronto Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul 30:1461672241263249. doi: 10.1177/01461672241263249.

DOI:10.1177/01461672241263249
PMID:39078033
Abstract

The use of videoconferencing platforms has globally risen to facilitate face-to-face communication since the onset of COVID-19. But how do our first impressions of people we meet on Zoom compare to in-person interactions? Specifically, do we view others' personalities as accurately (in line with their unique personality) and normatively (in line with the average, desirable personality) as in-person? Across two Zoom first-impression round-robin studies (exploratory study: = 567, = 3,053; preregistered replication: = 371, = 1,961), which we compared to an in-person round-robin study ( = 306; = 1,682), people viewed others' personalities as accurately and as normatively on Zoom as in-person. Moreover, people better liked interaction partners they viewed more accurately and normatively. However, in interactions of poorer audio-video quality, people viewed others less accurately, less normatively, and liked them less. Overall, through a screen, our impressions of others are as accurate and normative as face-to-face, but it depends on the quality of that screen.

摘要

自新冠疫情爆发以来,视频会议平台的使用在全球范围内有所增加,以促进面对面交流。但是,我们在Zoom上对所遇到的人的第一印象与面对面互动相比如何呢?具体而言,我们对他人个性的看法是否与面对面时一样准确(符合他们独特的个性)和规范(符合平均的、理想的个性)?在两项Zoom第一印象循环研究(探索性研究:n = 567,N = 3053;预先注册的复制研究:n = 371,N = 1961)中,我们将其与一项面对面循环研究(n = 306;N = 1682)进行比较,结果发现人们在Zoom上对他人个性的看法与面对面时一样准确和规范。此外,人们更喜欢他们认为更准确和规范的互动伙伴。然而,在音频-视频质量较差的互动中,人们对他人的看法不那么准确、不那么规范,也不太喜欢他们。总体而言,通过屏幕,我们对他人的印象与面对面时一样准确和规范,但这取决于屏幕的质量。

相似文献

1
Perceiving Others Through a Screen: Are First Impressions of Personality Accurate and Normative via Videoconferencing?通过屏幕感知他人:视频会议中对个性的第一印象准确且具有规范性吗?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul 30:1461672241263249. doi: 10.1177/01461672241263249.
2
Knowing versus liking: Separating normative knowledge from social desirability in first impressions of personality.了解与喜欢:在对人格的第一印象中将规范性知识与社会期望区分开来。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Dec;109(6):1105-16. doi: 10.1037/a0039587. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
3
"Zooming" in on positive and accurate metaperceptions in first impressions: Examining the links with social anxiety and liking in online video interactions.在第一印象中准确感知积极和准确的印象:在线视频互动中考察与社交焦虑和喜欢的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Oct;125(4):852-873. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000457. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
4
Through the looking glass clearly: accuracy and assumed similarity in well-adjusted individuals' first impressions.透过哈哈镜清晰可见:适应良好个体的第一印象的准确性和假定相似性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Feb;100(2):349-64. doi: 10.1037/a0021850.
5
Like yourself, and others will follow: The role of target self-esteem in the association between being seen accurately and being liked in platonic and romantic first impressions.像你自己一样,别人也会跟随:在柏拉图式和浪漫式第一印象中,被准确地看到和被喜欢之间的关系中的目标自尊的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Oct;127(4):936-948. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000521. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
6
What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood. Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first impressions of personality.美即善,且能更准确地被理解。外表吸引力与第一印象中对人格准确性的判断。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Dec;21(12):1777-82. doi: 10.1177/0956797610388048. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
7
The cost of forming more accurate impressions: accuracy-motivated perceivers see the personality of others more distinctively but less normatively than perceivers without an explicit goal.形成更准确印象的代价:与没有明确目标的感知者相比,以准确性为动机的感知者对他人的个性的感知更鲜明但更不规范。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):589-94. doi: 10.1177/0956797610364121. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
8
Social anxiety and liking: Towards understanding the role of metaperceptions in first impressions.社交焦虑与喜爱:理解元认知在第一印象中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct;121(4):948-968. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000363. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
9
Cardiac vagal flexibility and accurate personality impressions: Examining a physiological correlate of the good judge.心脏迷走神经灵活性与准确的人格印象:检验好法官的生理相关因素
J Pers. 2018 Dec;86(6):1065-1077. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12375. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
10
Accuracy in Perceptions of Fundamental Social Motives: Comparisons to Perceptions of Big Five Traits and Associations With Friendship Quality.基本社会动机感知的准确性:与大五人格特质感知的比较及其与友谊质量的关系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Jan;46(1):3-19. doi: 10.1177/0146167219838546. Epub 2019 Apr 25.