Suppr超能文献

固定矫治器和透明矫治器的正畸疼痛:6 个月的比较。

Orthodontic pain with fixed appliances and clear aligners: A 6-month comparison.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.

Department of Orthodontics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2024 Nov;166(5):469-479. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.07.002. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This prospective study compared pain perception, intensity, and analgesic use among patients treated with fixed appliances (FAs) and clear aligners (CAs) over 6 months.

METHODS

Digital surveys were collected from 87 adult patients treated with CA or FA from 2 orthodontic offices. The 7-item survey was sent at 3-time points (preappointment, 2-day postappointment, and 7-day postappointment) for each appointment. Wilcoxon, t test, and Fisher exact chi-square tests were performed with significance set at 0.05.

RESULTS

The FA group had a higher rate and intensity of pain 2 days after the second, third, and fifth appointments (P <0.030). At 7 days postappointment, the FA group had a higher rate and intensity of pain for the first and fifth appointments. Dull pain was reported the most in both groups, with a proportion of FA patients reporting throbbing (31%) or sharp (20%) pain (P = 0.035) at 2 days postappointment. The CA group reported the most pain at rest, whereas the FA group reported chewing as the most painful (P = 0.002). The FA group had a higher rate of analgesic consumption after the first appointment (P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the FA and CA groups experienced similar rates and intensities of pain 2 days after the delivery of appliances at the first appointment. Although CA pain intensity remained minimal, FA pain peaked 2 days postappointment whenever a new orthodontic stimulus was introduced and remained elevated 7 days postappointment when that stimulus was a new archwire material.

摘要

简介

本前瞻性研究比较了固定矫治器(FA)和透明矫治器(CA)治疗患者在 6 个月内的疼痛感知、强度和镇痛药物使用情况。

方法

从 2 家正畸诊所接受 CA 或 FA 治疗的 87 名成年患者中收集了数字调查。在每个预约的 3 个时间点(预约前、预约后 2 天和预约后 7 天)发送了 7 项调查。采用 Wilcoxon、t 检验和 Fisher 确切卡方检验,显著性水平设为 0.05。

结果

FA 组在第二次、第三次和第五次预约后 2 天的疼痛发生率和强度更高(P<0.030)。在预约后 7 天,FA 组在第一次和第五次预约时的疼痛发生率和强度更高。两组患者均报告最多的钝痛,预约后 2 天 FA 组报告搏动性(31%)或锐痛(20%)疼痛的患者比例较高(P=0.035)。CA 组报告在休息时疼痛最严重,而 FA 组报告咀嚼时最痛(P=0.002)。FA 组在第一次预约后镇痛药物使用率更高(P=0.037)。

结论

FA 和 CA 两组在第一次预约时接受矫治器后 2 天的疼痛发生率和强度相似。虽然 CA 疼痛强度保持最小,但每当引入新的正畸刺激时,FA 疼痛在预约后 2 天达到峰值,并在该刺激为新的弓丝材料时在预约后 7 天仍保持升高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验