Gao Shasha, Wu Peipei, Cheng Yang
Outpatient Department, Debei Dental Clinic, Deyang, Sichuan Province, China.
Orthodontic Department, Deyang Stomatological Hospital, Deyang, Sichuan Province, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 25;104(30):e43559. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043559.
This research aimed to assess the efficacy of ibuprofen and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in pain reduction following the placement of elastomeric separators, utilizing a network meta-analysis (NMA) to synthesize data from relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our objective was to determine the most effective method for pain management in orthodontic patients.
This study was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number: CRD42025640519). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across various databases up to January 19, 2025, to identify RCTs evaluating the impact of ibuprofen and LLLT on pain intensity following orthodontic separator placement. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A NMA was performed to combine direct and indirect comparisons, ranking the interventions based on their effectiveness in alleviating pain at 6 hours and 24 hours after orthodontic separator placement.
Twenty-three studies with 1007 participants were included in the NMA. Both ibuprofen and LLLT demonstrated significantly greater reductions in pain intensity compared to control or placebo groups at all assessed time points. For ibuprofen, pain reduction was observed at 6-hour with a mean difference (MD) of -1.93 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of -2.93 to -0.93, and at 24-hour with an MD of -1.63 (95% CI: -2.58 to -0.68). For LLLT, the MD at 6-hour was -1.46 (95% CI: -2.28 to -0.64), and at 24-hour, the MD was -1.84 (95% CI: -2.52 to -1.16). Ibuprofen showed greater effectiveness in reducing pain intensity at 6-hour, with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 88.4, whereas LLLT demonstrated more sustained reduction at 24-hour, with a SUCRA of 81.8.
This NMA provides evidence that both ibuprofen and LLLT are effective in reducing pain following elastomeric separator placement. Ibuprofen offers more immediate pain reduction, whereas LLLT offers more sustained effects over 24-hour. These findings suggest that a time-dependent, multimodal approach may be beneficial for optimizing orthodontic pain management. To further validate these findings and establish standardized clinical protocols, more high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed, particularly those involving direct, head-to-head comparisons between ibuprofen and LLLT.
本研究旨在评估布洛芬和低强度激光疗法(LLLT)在放置弹性分离器后减轻疼痛方面的疗效,采用网状Meta分析(NMA)来综合相关随机对照试验(RCT)的数据。我们的目标是确定正畸患者疼痛管理的最有效方法。
本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册(注册号:CRD42025640519)。截至2025年1月19日,在多个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,以识别评估布洛芬和LLLT对正畸分离器放置后疼痛强度影响的RCT。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的质量。进行NMA以结合直接和间接比较,根据干预措施在正畸分离器放置后6小时和24小时减轻疼痛的有效性对其进行排名。
NMA纳入了23项研究,共1007名参与者。在所有评估时间点,布洛芬和LLLT与对照组或安慰剂组相比,疼痛强度均有显著更大程度的降低。对于布洛芬,6小时时疼痛减轻,平均差值(MD)为-1.93,95%置信区间(CI)为-2.93至-0.93;24小时时MD为-1.63(95%CI:-2.58至-0.68)。对于LLLT,6小时时MD为-1.46(95%CI:-2.28至-0.64),24小时时MD为-1.84(95%CI:-2.52至-1.16)。布洛芬在6小时时减轻疼痛强度方面显示出更大的有效性,累积排名曲线下面积(SUCRA)为88.4,而LLLT在24小时时显示出更持续的减轻效果,SUCRA为81.8。
本NMA提供了证据,表明布洛芬和LLLT在减轻弹性分离器放置后的疼痛方面均有效。布洛芬能更快减轻疼痛,而LLLT在24小时内效果更持久。这些发现表明,一种基于时间的多模式方法可能有利于优化正畸疼痛管理。为了进一步验证这些发现并建立标准化的临床方案,需要更多高质量的随机临床试验,特别是那些涉及布洛芬和LLLT之间直接、头对头比较的试验。