Suppr超能文献

赖氨酸衍生的聚氨酯手术粘合剂在腹壁成形术患者中替代渐进性张力缝合的应用:一项队列研究。

Use of a Lysine-Derived Urethane Surgical Adhesive as an Alternative to Progressive Tension Sutures in Abdominoplasty Patients: A Cohort Study.

作者信息

Spring Michelle A

机构信息

Private practice in Kalispell, MT.

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Nov 12;38(12):1318-1329. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy094.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fluid accumulation is a common complication after abdominoplasty procedures, and is typically managed by the placement of post-surgical drains. Progressive tension sutures (PTS) have been shown to be an effective approach to reduce the dead space by point-wise mechanical fixation, allowing for drain-free procedures. Lysine-derived urethane surgical adhesive provides an alternative approach for mechanical fixation and reduction of dead space, and may reduce surgery time compared to PTS.

OBJECTIVES

This prospective, controlled, single center clinical study compared progressive tension suture wound closure technique without drains (control) to tissue adhesive wound closure technique without drains (test) during abdominoplasty surgery. The objective was to determine if lysine-derived urethane surgical adhesive is an effective alternative to PTS for drain-free abdominoplasty procedures.

METHODS

Patients undergoing abdominoplasty who met the established inclusion/exclusion criteria were consented and enrolled in the study. Ten PTS (control) cases were performed, followed immediately by 10 tissue adhesive (test) cases.

RESULTS

Surgeries were completed over an 8-month period. No statistical differences were identified between the two groups with regard to age, BMI, dissection surface area or flap weight. No clinical seroma formation was observed in either group. In the control (PTS) group, two patients developed small areas of dermal closure suture abscess requiring removal of suture material. One control patient developed drainage and fat necrosis thought to be related to PTS above the incision and later required a scar revision. One tissue adhesive patient developed hypertrophic scars of both her breast reduction and abdominoplasty scars requiring additional treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Lysine-derived urethane surgical adhesive was applied in less time than PTS, even after accounting for holding pressure for 5 minutes. The tissue adhesive provided four times the number of attachment points compared to PTS, although the significance of this is not clear. Based on these results, the use of lysine-derived urethane surgical adhesive was found to be a safe and effective alternative to PTS to reduce seroma formation in drain-free abdominoplasty procedures.

摘要

背景

液体蓄积是腹部整形手术后常见的并发症,通常通过放置术后引流管来处理。渐进性张力缝合(PTS)已被证明是一种有效的方法,通过逐点机械固定来减少死腔,从而实现无引流手术。赖氨酸衍生的聚氨酯手术粘合剂为机械固定和减少死腔提供了另一种方法,与PTS相比可能缩短手术时间。

目的

这项前瞻性、对照、单中心临床研究在腹部整形手术期间,将无引流的渐进性张力缝合伤口闭合技术(对照组)与无引流的组织粘合剂伤口闭合技术(试验组)进行了比较。目的是确定赖氨酸衍生的聚氨酯手术粘合剂在无引流腹部整形手术中是否是PTS的有效替代方法。

方法

符合既定纳入/排除标准的接受腹部整形手术的患者签署知情同意书并纳入研究。先进行了10例PTS(对照)病例,随后立即进行了10例组织粘合剂(试验)病例。

结果

手术在8个月内完成。两组在年龄、体重指数、解剖表面积或皮瓣重量方面未发现统计学差异。两组均未观察到临床血清肿形成。在对照组(PTS)中,两名患者出现小面积真皮闭合缝线脓肿,需要拆除缝线材料。一名对照患者出现切口上方与PTS相关的引流和脂肪坏死,后来需要进行瘢痕修复。一名组织粘合剂患者在乳房缩小术和腹部整形术瘢痕处均出现增生性瘢痕,需要进一步治疗。

结论

即使考虑到保持压力5分钟,赖氨酸衍生的聚氨酯手术粘合剂的应用时间也比PTS短。与PTS相比,组织粘合剂提供的附着点数量是其四倍,尽管其意义尚不清楚。基于这些结果,发现使用赖氨酸衍生的聚氨酯手术粘合剂是PTS的一种安全有效的替代方法,可减少无引流腹部整形手术中血清肿的形成。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验