School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK.
School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Hillhead Street 62, Glasgow, G12 8QE5, Scotland, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Oct;242(10):2281-2294. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06890-z. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
Image content is prioritized in the visual system. Faces are a paradigmatic example, receiving preferential processing along the visual pathway compared to other visual stimuli. Moreover, face prioritization manifests also in behavior. People tend to look at faces more frequently and for longer periods, and saccadic reaction times can be faster when targeting a face as opposed to a phase-scrambled control. However, it is currently not clear at which stage image content affects oculomotor planning and execution. It can be hypothesized that image content directly influences oculomotor signal generation. Alternatively, the image content could exert its influence on oculomotor planning and execution at a later stage, after the image has been processed. Here we aim to disentangle these two alternative hypotheses by measuring the frequency of saccades toward a visual target when the latter is followed by a visual transient in the central visual field. Behaviorally, this paradigm leads to a reduction in saccade frequency that happens about 90 ms after any visual transient event, also known as saccadic "inhibition". In two experiments, we measured occurrence of saccades in visually guided saccades as well as microsaccades during fixation, using face and noise-matched visual stimuli. We observed that while the reduction in saccade occurrence was similar for both stimulus types, face stimuli lead to a prolonged reduction in eye movements. Moreover, saccade kinematics were altered by both stimulus types, showing an amplitude reduction without change in peak velocity for the earliest saccades. Taken together, our experiments imply that face stimuli primarily affect the later stages of the behavioral phenomenon of saccadic "inhibition". We propose that while some stimulus features are processed at an early stage and can quickly influence eye movements, a delayed signal conveying image content information is necessary to further inhibit/delay activity in the oculomotor system to trigger eye movements.
图像内容在视觉系统中优先处理。人脸是一个典型的例子,与其他视觉刺激相比,它们在视觉通路上受到优先处理。此外,面部优先处理也表现在行为上。人们往往更频繁地、更长时间地看脸,当目标是人脸而不是相位随机化的控制时,眼跳反应时间可以更快。然而,目前尚不清楚图像内容在哪个阶段影响眼球运动的计划和执行。可以假设图像内容直接影响眼球运动信号的产生。或者,图像内容可以在图像被处理后,在更晚的阶段对眼球运动计划和执行施加影响。在这里,我们旨在通过测量当中央视觉场中的视觉瞬变紧随视觉目标之后,眼球向视觉目标的扫视频率,来区分这两种替代假设。从行为上看,这种范式导致扫视频率降低,大约在任何视觉瞬变事件发生后 90 毫秒发生,也称为扫视“抑制”。在两个实验中,我们使用人脸和噪声匹配的视觉刺激,测量了在视觉引导的扫视和注视时的微扫视中,扫视的发生情况。我们观察到,虽然两种刺激类型的扫视发生减少情况相似,但人脸刺激导致眼动的减少持续时间更长。此外,两种刺激类型都改变了扫视的运动学,对于最早的扫视,幅度减小而峰值速度不变。总的来说,我们的实验表明,人脸刺激主要影响扫视“抑制”这一行为现象的后期阶段。我们提出,虽然一些刺激特征在早期阶段被处理,并能快速影响眼球运动,但需要传递图像内容信息的延迟信号,以进一步抑制/延迟眼动系统的活动,从而触发眼球运动。