Suppr超能文献

评价两种用于检测实验感染猪非洲猪瘟病毒的笔式检测试剂盒的诊断灵敏度和特异性。

Evaluation of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of two pen-side tests for detecting African swine fever virus in experimentally infected pigs.

机构信息

Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam.

Nebraska Center for Virology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.

出版信息

Arch Virol. 2024 Jul 30;169(8):170. doi: 10.1007/s00705-024-06098-0.

Abstract

African swine fever virus (ASFV) has spread through many countries and regions worldwide, causing significant losses. Timely detection of ASFV-infected pigs is crucial for disease control. In this study, we assessed the performance of two pen-side tests: a portable real-time PCR (qPCR) test for detecting viral genomic DNA and a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for detecting viral antigens. To determine the time from infection to the earliest detection, 10 ASFV-seronegative pigs were inoculated intramuscularly with 10 hemadsorption dose 50 of a highly virulent ASFV strain. Whole blood and oral swab samples were alternately collected from each group of five pigs daily until all succumbed to the infection. Samples were promptly subjected to the two pen-side tests upon collection, and a subset was transported to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory for analysis using a reference qPCR assay. Viral genomic DNA was consistently detected by the reference qPCR assay in all blood samples from 2 days postinfection (dpi), preceding the onset of clinical signs, and in oral swabs from 4 dpi onwards. The portable qPCR test demonstrated comparable performance to the reference qPCR assay for both whole blood and oral swab samples. The LFIA exhibited 100% specificity when testing with whole blood samples but showed reduced sensitivity, particularly for blood samples collected early or late after infection. The antigen test did not perform well with oral swabs.

摘要

非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)已在全球许多国家和地区传播,造成了重大损失。及时检测感染 ASFV 的猪对于疾病控制至关重要。在本研究中,我们评估了两种床边检测的性能:一种用于检测病毒基因组 DNA 的便携式实时 PCR(qPCR)检测,以及一种用于检测病毒抗原的侧向流动免疫分析(LFIA)。为了确定从感染到最早检测的时间,我们将 10 头 ASFV 血清阴性猪肌肉内接种了 10 个血凝吸附剂量 50 的高致病性 ASFV 株。每天从每组 5 头猪中交替采集全血和口腔拭子样本,直到所有猪都感染死亡。采集样本后立即进行两种床边检测,一部分样本被运送到兽医诊断实验室,使用参考 qPCR 检测进行分析。在感染后 2 天(dpi),即在临床症状出现之前,所有血液样本中均通过参考 qPCR 检测到持续存在病毒基因组 DNA,而口腔拭子中则从 4 dpi 开始检测到。便携式 qPCR 检测在全血和口腔拭子样本上与参考 qPCR 检测具有相当的性能。LFIA 用于全血样本时特异性为 100%,但敏感性降低,尤其是在感染后早期或晚期采集的血液样本中。抗原检测在口腔拭子上表现不佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3b7/11289199/2a86455501b8/705_2024_6098_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验