• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国小学生的智力思维模式轨迹概况:与四至六年级学业成绩变化的关联

Intelligence Mindsets Trajectory Profiles among Chinese Elementary School Students: Associations with Changes in Academic Achievement from Grades 4 to 6.

作者信息

Qi Cai, Guo Xiaolin, Liu Chunhui, Li Yue, Zhao Baoxu, Bi Tiantian, Luo Liang

机构信息

Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Jan;54(1):238-254. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02061-z. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1007/s10964-024-02061-z
PMID:39080106
Abstract

Early adolescence is a critical period for the development of children's intelligence mindsets, which play a significant role in academic achievement. However, existing research predominantly employs variable-centered approaches, which fail to capture individual differences in mindset-achievement relations. This research addresses this gap by adopting a longitudinal person-centered approach to explore the joint developmental trajectories of growth and fixed mindsets among early adolescents. It further explores how these trajectories relate to changes in academic achievement (i.e., the mean of standardized mathematics and Chinese achievement test scores) over 2 years, accounting for intelligence and sociodemographic factors such as age, sex, and family SES. In two five-wave longitudinal studies with 748 (M = 10.23 years, SD = 0.30; 49% girls at T1) and 3258 (M = 10.34 years, SD = 0.37; 49% girls at T1) Chinese elementary school students from grades 4 to 6, four distinct mindset trajectory profiles were identified: Growth (initially high growth but low fixed mindsets), Fixed (initially high fixed but low growth mindsets), Moderate (initially moderate levels in both mindsets), and Both-High (initially high levels in both mindsets). Analysis across both studies revealed that students in the Growth trajectory profile exhibited the most significant improvements in academic achievement 2 years later. Conversely, students in the Both-High trajectory profile experienced the least favorable academic outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing individual differences in mindset trajectories and their potential impact on academic outcomes. The current research underscores the need for educational interventions that are tailored to different mindset profiles to optimize student development and achievement.

摘要

青春期早期是儿童智力思维模式发展的关键时期,这对学业成绩起着重要作用。然而,现有研究主要采用以变量为中心的方法,未能捕捉到思维模式与成绩关系中的个体差异。本研究通过采用纵向的以个体为中心的方法来解决这一差距,以探索青春期早期学生成长型思维模式和固定型思维模式的联合发展轨迹。它进一步探讨了这些轨迹如何与两年内学业成绩的变化(即标准化数学和语文成绩测试分数的平均值)相关,并考虑了智力以及年龄、性别和家庭社会经济地位等社会人口因素。在两项针对748名(平均年龄M = 10.23岁,标准差SD = 0.30;T1时49%为女生)和3258名(平均年龄M = 10.34岁,标准差SD = 0.37;T1时49%为女生)四至六年级中国小学生的五波纵向研究中,确定了四种不同的思维模式轨迹类型:成长型(最初成长型思维模式高但固定型思维模式低)、固定型(最初固定型思维模式高但成长型思维模式低)、中等型(最初两种思维模式水平中等)和双高型(最初两种思维模式水平都高)。两项研究的分析均显示,成长型轨迹类型的学生在两年后的学业成绩有最显著的提高。相反,双高型轨迹类型的学生学业成绩最差。这些发现凸显了认识思维模式轨迹中的个体差异及其对学业成绩潜在影响的重要性。当前研究强调需要针对不同思维模式类型进行量身定制的教育干预,以优化学生发展和成绩。

相似文献

1
Intelligence Mindsets Trajectory Profiles among Chinese Elementary School Students: Associations with Changes in Academic Achievement from Grades 4 to 6.中国小学生的智力思维模式轨迹概况:与四至六年级学业成绩变化的关联
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Jan;54(1):238-254. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02061-z. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Students' cross-domain mindset profiles and academic achievement in Finnish lower-secondary education.芬兰初中教育中学生的跨领域思维模式概况与学业成绩。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 23;16:1514879. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1514879. eCollection 2025.
3
Mindset × Context: Schools, Classrooms, and the Unequal Translation of Expectations into Math Achievement.心态×背景:学校、课堂和期望在数学成就上的不平等转化。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2023 Sep;88(2):7-109. doi: 10.1111/mono.12471.
4
Mindset profiles of secondary school students: Associations with academic achievement, motivation and school burnout symptoms.中学生的思维模式概况:与学业成绩、动机和学校倦怠症状的关联。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2024 Sep;94(3):738-758. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12676. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
Leveraging Mindsets to Promote Academic Achievement: Policy Recommendations.利用思维模式促进学业成就:政策建议。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;10(6):721-6. doi: 10.1177/1745691615599383.
6
Association between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity trajectories and academic achievement in Chinese primary school children: a 3-year longitudinal study.中国小学生中等到剧烈身体活动轨迹与学业成绩之间的关联:一项为期3年的纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21487-z.
7
Co-Developmental Trajectories of Specific Anxiety Symptoms from Middle Childhood to Early Adolescence: Associations with Psychological Well-Being and Academic Achievement.特定焦虑症状从中小学到青春期早期的共同发展轨迹:与心理健康和学业成绩的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Jun;50(6):1140-1156. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01411-5. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
8
Helping students to face academic failures: Evaluation of a growth mindset intervention among primary school students in China.帮助学生应对学业失败:中国小学生成长型思维干预的评估。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2024 May;16(2):397-420. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12496. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
9
Relations between achievement task values and academic achievement and depressive symptoms in Chinese elementary school students: Variable-centered and person-centered perspectives.成就任务价值观与中小学生学业成就和抑郁症状的关系:变量中心和个体中心视角。
Sch Psychol. 2021 May;36(3):167-180. doi: 10.1037/spq0000384.
10
Growth mindset and academic outcomes: a comparison of US and Chinese students.成长型思维模式与学业成绩:美国学生与中国学生的比较
NPJ Sci Learn. 2021 Jul 19;6(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41539-021-00100-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of growth mindset on subjective wellbeing in elementary school students: a moderated mediation model.成长型思维模式对小学生主观幸福感的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 9;16:1595422. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1595422. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions: For whom, how, and why might such interventions work?成长思维模式干预的系统评价和荟萃分析:此类干预措施为何、如何以及针对谁可能有效?
Psychol Bull. 2023 Mar-Apr;149(3-4):174-205. doi: 10.1037/bul0000368. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
2
Growth mindset and academic outcomes: a comparison of US and Chinese students.成长型思维模式与学业成绩:美国学生与中国学生的比较
NPJ Sci Learn. 2021 Jul 19;6(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41539-021-00100-z.
3
What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?
从成长型思维模式的争议中可以学到什么?
Am Psychol. 2020 Dec;75(9):1269-1284. doi: 10.1037/amp0000794.
4
Socioeconomic Status Gradients in Young Children's Well-Being at School.社会经济地位对儿童在校幸福感的影响。
Child Dev. 2021 Jan;92(1):e91-e105. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13453. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
5
You can't change your basic ability, but you work at things, and that's how we get hard things done: Testing the role of growth mindset on response to setbacks, educational attainment, and cognitive ability.你无法改变自己的基本能力,但你可以努力去做一些事情,这就是我们如何完成困难的事情的方法:检验成长型思维模式对挫折应对、教育程度和认知能力的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Sep;148(9):1640-1655. doi: 10.1037/xge0000669.
6
Mindsets: A View From Two Eras.思维模式:两个时代的观点。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 May;14(3):481-496. doi: 10.1177/1745691618804166. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
7
Implicit Theories of Intelligence and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review.智力与学业成就的内隐理论:一项元分析综述
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 5;9:829. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829. eCollection 2018.
8
To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-Analyses.成长型思维模式对学业成就的重要性有多大?在哪些情况下?两项元分析。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Apr;29(4):549-571. doi: 10.1177/0956797617739704. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
9
Individual differences in Zhong-Yong tendency and processing capacity.中庸倾向与处理能力的个体差异。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 19;5:1316. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01316. eCollection 2014.
10
Mind-sets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation.心态很重要:内隐理论与自我调节的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2013 May;139(3):655-701. doi: 10.1037/a0029531. Epub 2012 Aug 6.