Qi Cai, Guo Xiaolin, Liu Chunhui, Li Yue, Zhao Baoxu, Bi Tiantian, Luo Liang
Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK.
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Jan;54(1):238-254. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02061-z. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
Early adolescence is a critical period for the development of children's intelligence mindsets, which play a significant role in academic achievement. However, existing research predominantly employs variable-centered approaches, which fail to capture individual differences in mindset-achievement relations. This research addresses this gap by adopting a longitudinal person-centered approach to explore the joint developmental trajectories of growth and fixed mindsets among early adolescents. It further explores how these trajectories relate to changes in academic achievement (i.e., the mean of standardized mathematics and Chinese achievement test scores) over 2 years, accounting for intelligence and sociodemographic factors such as age, sex, and family SES. In two five-wave longitudinal studies with 748 (M = 10.23 years, SD = 0.30; 49% girls at T1) and 3258 (M = 10.34 years, SD = 0.37; 49% girls at T1) Chinese elementary school students from grades 4 to 6, four distinct mindset trajectory profiles were identified: Growth (initially high growth but low fixed mindsets), Fixed (initially high fixed but low growth mindsets), Moderate (initially moderate levels in both mindsets), and Both-High (initially high levels in both mindsets). Analysis across both studies revealed that students in the Growth trajectory profile exhibited the most significant improvements in academic achievement 2 years later. Conversely, students in the Both-High trajectory profile experienced the least favorable academic outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing individual differences in mindset trajectories and their potential impact on academic outcomes. The current research underscores the need for educational interventions that are tailored to different mindset profiles to optimize student development and achievement.
青春期早期是儿童智力思维模式发展的关键时期,这对学业成绩起着重要作用。然而,现有研究主要采用以变量为中心的方法,未能捕捉到思维模式与成绩关系中的个体差异。本研究通过采用纵向的以个体为中心的方法来解决这一差距,以探索青春期早期学生成长型思维模式和固定型思维模式的联合发展轨迹。它进一步探讨了这些轨迹如何与两年内学业成绩的变化(即标准化数学和语文成绩测试分数的平均值)相关,并考虑了智力以及年龄、性别和家庭社会经济地位等社会人口因素。在两项针对748名(平均年龄M = 10.23岁,标准差SD = 0.30;T1时49%为女生)和3258名(平均年龄M = 10.34岁,标准差SD = 0.37;T1时49%为女生)四至六年级中国小学生的五波纵向研究中,确定了四种不同的思维模式轨迹类型:成长型(最初成长型思维模式高但固定型思维模式低)、固定型(最初固定型思维模式高但成长型思维模式低)、中等型(最初两种思维模式水平中等)和双高型(最初两种思维模式水平都高)。两项研究的分析均显示,成长型轨迹类型的学生在两年后的学业成绩有最显著的提高。相反,双高型轨迹类型的学生学业成绩最差。这些发现凸显了认识思维模式轨迹中的个体差异及其对学业成绩潜在影响的重要性。当前研究强调需要针对不同思维模式类型进行量身定制的教育干预,以优化学生发展和成绩。