Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, United States.
Institute for Informatics, Data Science and Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, United States.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;31(10):2356-2368. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae204.
We evaluated the effectiveness and implementability of a standardized EHR-integrated handoff report to support intraoperative handoffs.
A pre-post intervention study was used to compare the quality of intraoperative handoffs supported by unstructured notes (pre) to structured, standardized EHR-integrated handoff reports (post). Participants included anesthesia clinicians involved in intraoperative handoffs. A mixed-method approach was followed, supported by general observations, shadowing, surveys, and interviews.
One hundred and fifty-one intraoperative permanent handoffs (78 pre, 73 post) were included. One hundred percent of participants in the post-intervention cohort utilized the report. Compared to unstructured, structured handoffs using the EHR-integrated handoff report led to: (1) significant increase in the transfer of information about airway management (55%-78%, P < .001), intraoperative course (63%-86%, P < .001), and potential concerns (64%-88%, P < .001); (2) significant improvement in clinician satisfaction scores, with regards to information clarity and succinctness (4.5-4.7, P = .002), information transfer (3.8-4.2, P = .011), and opportunities for fewer errors reported by senders (3.3-2.5, P < .001) and receivers (3.2-2.4, P < .001); and (3) significant decrease in handoff duration (326.2-262.3 s, P = .016). Clinicians found the report implementation highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible but noted a few areas for improvement to enhance its usability and integration within the intraoperative workflow.
A standardized EHR-integrated handoff report ensures the effectiveness and efficiency of intraoperative handoffs with its structured, consistent format that-promotes up-to-date and pertinent intraoperative information transfer; reduces opportunities for errors; and streamlines verbal communication. Handoff standardization can promote safe and high-quality intraoperative care.
我们评估了标准化 EHR 整合式交班报告在支持术中交班中的有效性和可实施性。
采用前后干预研究比较了在结构化、标准化 EHR 整合式交班报告(后)支持下,与非结构化交班记录(前)相比,术中交班的质量。参与者包括参与术中交班的麻醉临床医生。采用混合方法,包括一般观察、影子观察、调查和访谈。
共纳入 151 例术中永久性交班(前 78 例,后 73 例)。后干预组的所有参与者都使用了报告。与非结构化、结构化的 EHR 整合式交班报告相比,交班报告可实现:(1)气道管理(55%-78%,P < .001)、术中过程(63%-86%,P < .001)和潜在关注点(64%-88%,P < .001)信息传输显著增加;(2)临床医生满意度评分显著提高,对信息清晰度和简洁度(4.5-4.7,P = .002)、信息传输(3.8-4.2,P = .011)以及发送者(3.3-2.5,P < .001)和接收者(3.2-2.4,P < .001)报告错误机会减少的满意度评分显著提高;(3)交班时间显著缩短(326.2-262.3s,P = .016)。临床医生认为报告实施具有高度可接受性、适当性和可行性,但也指出了一些需要改进的地方,以提高其可用性和在术中工作流程中的整合性。
标准化 EHR 整合式交班报告以其结构化、一致的格式确保了术中交班的有效性和效率,促进了最新和相关的术中信息传输;减少了错误的机会;并简化了口头沟通。交班标准化可以促进安全和高质量的术中护理。