Health Informatics Research Group, University of Applied Sciences Osnabrück, Germany.
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Jul;82(7):580-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
Establishing continuity of care in handovers at changes of shift is a challenging endeavor that is jeopardized by time pressure and errors typically occurring during synchronous communication. Only if the outgoing and incoming persons manage to collaboratively build a common ground for the next steps of care is it possible to ensure a proper continuation. Electronic systems, in particular electronic patient record systems, are powerful providers of information but their actual use might threaten achieving a common understanding of the patient if they force clinicians to work asynchronously. In order to gain a deeper understanding of communication failures and how to overcome them, we performed a systematic review of the literature, aiming to answer the following four research questions: (1a) What are typical errors and (1b) their consequences in handovers? (2) How can they be overcome by conventional strategies and instruments? (3) electronic systems? (4) Are there any instruments to support collaborative grounding?
We searched the databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, and COCHRANE for articles on handovers in general and in combination with the terms electronic record systems and grounding that covered the time period of January 2000 to May 2012.
The search led to 519 articles of which 60 were then finally included into the review. We found a sharp increase in the number of relevant studies starting with 2008. As could be documented by 20 studies that addressed communication errors, omission of detailed patient information including anticipatory guidance during handovers was the greatest problem. This deficiency could be partly overcome by structuring and systematizing the information, e.g. according to Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation schema (SBAR), and by employing electronic tools integrated in electronic records systems as 23 studies on conventional and 22 articles on electronic systems showed. Despite the increase in quantity and quality of the information achieved, it also became clear that there was still the unsolved problem of anticipatory guidance and presenting "the full story" of the patient. Only a small number of studies actually addressed how to establish common ground with the help of electronic tools.
The increase in studies manifests the rise of great interest in the handover scenario. Electronic patient record systems proved to be excellent information feeders to handover tools, but their role in collaborative grounding is unclear. Concepts of how to move to joint information processing and IT-enabled social interaction have to be implemented and tested.
在交接班时建立护理连续性是一项具有挑战性的工作,由于同步交流过程中经常出现时间压力和错误,这项工作受到了威胁。只有当即将交班的人和即将接班的人共同为护理的下一步建立一个共同的基础,才能确保护理的顺利延续。电子系统,特别是电子病历系统,是强大的信息提供者,但如果它们迫使临床医生进行异步工作,它们的实际使用可能会威胁到对患者的共同理解。为了更深入地了解沟通失败的原因以及如何克服这些问题,我们对文献进行了系统回顾,旨在回答以下四个研究问题:(1a) 交接班时通常会出现哪些典型错误?(1b) 这些错误会带来哪些后果?(2) 传统策略和工具如何克服这些错误?(3) 电子系统呢?(4) 是否有支持协作基础的工具?
我们在 MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 COCHRANE 数据库中搜索了关于一般交接班和结合电子病历系统和基础这两个术语的文章,时间范围为 2000 年 1 月至 2012 年 5 月。
搜索结果共产生了 519 篇文章,其中 60 篇最终被纳入综述。我们发现,从 2008 年开始,相关研究的数量急剧增加。通过 20 项关于沟通错误的研究可以证明,交接班时遗漏详细的患者信息,包括预期指导,是最大的问题。通过结构化和系统化信息,例如按照情况、背景、评估和建议(SBAR)的格式,以及使用集成在电子病历系统中的电子工具,部分可以克服这一缺陷,正如 23 项关于传统方法和 22 项关于电子系统的研究所示。尽管所获得的信息量和质量都有所增加,但仍很清楚,在预期指导和呈现患者“完整情况”方面,仍然存在未解决的问题。只有少数研究实际上解决了如何借助电子工具建立共同基础的问题。
研究数量的增加表明,人们对接班场景的兴趣大增。电子病历系统已被证明是交接班工具的优秀信息提供者,但它们在协作基础方面的作用尚不清楚。必须实施和测试如何过渡到联合信息处理和 IT 支持的社会互动的概念。