• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于通过患者自控镇痛进行术后口服阿片类药物给药的患者和护士的单中心探索性调查。

A Single Center Exploratory Survey of Patients and Nurses on post-Surgical Oral Opioid Delivery Through Patient-Controlled Analgesia.

作者信息

Mirza Daniyal H, Zha Lucy, See Claudia, Paoletti Isabella N, Dai Feng, Hocevar Mark, Li Jinlei, Wiznia Daniel

机构信息

Yale College, New Haven, CT, 06520-8241, USA.

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2024 Jul 26;17:2483-2494. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S461379. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/JPR.S461379
PMID:39081328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11288353/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The most common route of opioid delivery is nurse-administered pills. However, there are numerous challenges such as nursing burden, opioid diversion, medication delay, and patient dissatisfaction. In this study, we conducted two surveys, first to assess patients' and nurses' opinions on the current administration of opioids in pill form, followed by their attitudes towards an innovative concept of oral medication delivery based on a medical device currently undergoing research and development within the University, patient-controlled dispenser and deactivator (PCDD) that allows patients to self-administer liquid oral opioids on demand based on physician prescription.

METHODS

Questionnaires were developed, verified and deployed to assess nurse and post-surgical patient opinions on the current administration of opioids in pill form, as well as the proposed new concept of patient -controlled administration of oral liquid medication via an illustration of PCDD, from September 2022 through July 2023 at a major academic tertiary care center. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from postoperative patients and nurses from surgical specialties including General Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics, and Neurosurgery.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients and 53 nurses were interviewed. Seventy percent of patients frequently called nurses for pain medication post-surgery 1-4 times daily, and 32% of patients were told each day by nurses that they could not receive medication because they were not due yet. Medication delay caused 24% of patients to worry about nursing availability for medication delivery. Likewise, nurses reported that half of patients receive delayed medication (22 minutes median delay time) and half of nursing time was spent administering pain medication. Nurses expressed moderate satisfaction with their current delivery of medication (median satisfaction score 6.5 out of 10). When being introduced to the concept of PCDD via a product illustration, 15% of patients said that they prefer liquid medication and 51% said they prefer PCDD or were interested in trying it.

CONCLUSION

Nurse-administered pills are a common but suboptimal method for postoperative pain management. Based on patient and nurse feedback, patient controlled self-administered liquid oral opioid delivery is conceptually innovative, practically viable and potentially a preferred alternative for timely and less nurse-exhaustive pain management.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物最常见的给药途径是由护士发放药片。然而,这存在诸多挑战,如护理负担、阿片类药物的转移、给药延迟以及患者不满等问题。在本研究中,我们进行了两项调查,首先评估患者和护士对当前阿片类药物片剂给药方式的看法,随后了解他们对一种基于大学正在研发的医疗设备的口服给药创新概念的态度,即患者自控配药和停用装置(PCDD),该装置允许患者根据医生处方按需自行服用液体口服阿片类药物。

方法

2022年9月至2023年7月期间,在一家大型学术三级护理中心,设计、验证并发放问卷,以评估护士和术后患者对当前阿片类药物片剂给药方式的看法,以及通过PCDD示意图展示的患者自控口服液体药物给药的新概念。从包括普通外科、外科肿瘤学、创伤外科、骨科和神经外科在内的外科专业的术后患者和护士中收集定量和定性数据。

结果

共采访了43名患者和53名护士。70%的患者术后每天经常呼叫护士索要止痛药1 - 4次,32%的患者每天被护士告知因未到服药时间而无法服药。给药延迟导致24%的患者担心护士无法及时给药。同样,护士报告称,一半的患者存在给药延迟(中位延迟时间为22分钟),且一半的护理时间用于发放止痛药。护士对当前的给药方式表示中等程度的满意(中位满意度评分为6.5分(满分10分))。通过产品示意图向患者介绍PCDD概念时,15%的患者表示更喜欢液体药物,51%的患者表示更喜欢PCDD或有兴趣尝试。

结论

护士发放药片是术后疼痛管理的一种常见但并非最优的方法。根据患者和护士的反馈,患者自控自行服用液体口服阿片类药物在概念上具有创新性,在实际操作中可行,并且可能是及时且减少护士负担的疼痛管理的首选替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd9/11288353/1ec80d3000e3/JPR-17-2483-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd9/11288353/e5e4bdec4d5f/JPR-17-2483-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd9/11288353/b33a374b7d22/JPR-17-2483-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd9/11288353/99a43f1d118f/JPR-17-2483-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd9/11288353/bf5df98ff7b7/JPR-17-2483-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd9/11288353/1ec80d3000e3/JPR-17-2483-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd9/11288353/e5e4bdec4d5f/JPR-17-2483-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd9/11288353/b33a374b7d22/JPR-17-2483-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd9/11288353/99a43f1d118f/JPR-17-2483-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd9/11288353/bf5df98ff7b7/JPR-17-2483-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd9/11288353/1ec80d3000e3/JPR-17-2483-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
A Single Center Exploratory Survey of Patients and Nurses on post-Surgical Oral Opioid Delivery Through Patient-Controlled Analgesia.一项关于通过患者自控镇痛进行术后口服阿片类药物给药的患者和护士的单中心探索性调查。
J Pain Res. 2024 Jul 26;17:2483-2494. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S461379. eCollection 2024.
2
Nurses' Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Use of Oral Patient-Controlled Analgesia.护士对使用口服患者自控镇痛的认知与态度
Pain Manag Nurs. 2016 Apr;17(2):132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2016.02.051. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
3
4
Nursing knowledge and beliefs regarding patient-controlled oral analgesia (PCOA).关于患者自控口服镇痛(PCOA)的护理知识与信念。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2013 Dec;14(4):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
5
Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia vs nurse administered oral oxycodone after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.静脉患者自控镇痛与全膝关节置换术后口服羟考酮的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Pain. 2020 Nov 3;21(1):121-126. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0012. Print 2021 Jan 27.
6
Opioid Use and Storage Patterns by Patients after Hospital Discharge following Surgery.手术后出院患者的阿片类药物使用与储存模式
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0147972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147972. eCollection 2016.
7
A Comparison Study-Oral Patient-Controlled Analgesia Versus Traditional Delivery of Pain Medication Following Orthopaedic Procedures.一项对比研究——骨科手术后,口服病人自控镇痛与传统疼痛药物输送的比较。
Orthop Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;39(5):324-332. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000697.
8
Evaluation of an oral patient-controlled analgesia device for pain management in oncology inpatients.评估一种用于肿瘤住院患者疼痛管理的口服患者自控镇痛装置。
J Support Oncol. 2007 Oct;5(9):443-8.
9
Canadian nurse initiated analgesia protocol to reduce delays in the emergency department: A quality improvement study.加拿大护士启动镇痛方案以减少急诊科的延误:一项质量改进研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2024 Aug;75:101488. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101488. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
10
The effectiveness of an oral opioid rescue medication algorithm for postoperative pain management compared to PCIA : A cohort analysis.口服阿片类药物解救药物方案与 PCIA 用于术后疼痛管理的效果比较:队列分析。
Anaesthesist. 2020 Sep;69(9):639-648. doi: 10.1007/s00101-020-00806-6. Epub 2020 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Controlled Substance Waste: Concerns, Controversies, Solutions.受控物质废物:问题、争议与解决方案。
Cureus. 2022 Feb 24;14(2):e22564. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22564. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Trauma of major surgery: A global problem that is not going away.重大手术创伤:一个全球性问题,且并未消失。
Int J Surg. 2020 Sep;81:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.017. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
3
Postoperative pain management practices and their effectiveness after major gynecological surgery: An observational study in a tertiary care hospital.
大型妇科手术后的术后疼痛管理实践及其有效性:一项在三级护理医院开展的观察性研究
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct-Dec;34(4):478-484. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_387_17.
4
Safety of Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Surgery in Children And Adolescents: Concerns And Potential Solutions.儿童和青少年术后自控镇痛的安全性:关注点与潜在解决方案
Front Pediatr. 2018 Nov 6;6:336. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00336. eCollection 2018.
5
Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention.术后疼痛控制不佳:患病率、后果及预防
J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 25;10:2287-2298. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144066. eCollection 2017.
6
The evaluation of the benefits of pain control by patients using PCA pump compared to medicine injection to ease the pain by nurses.与护士通过注射药物缓解疼痛相比,对使用PCA泵的患者进行疼痛控制益处的评估。
J Med Life. 2015;8(Spec Iss 4):144-149.
7
Postoperative pain control.术后疼痛控制
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013 Sep;26(3):191-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351138.
8
Diversion of drugs within health care facilities, a multiple-victim crime: patterns of diversion, scope, consequences, detection, and prevention.医疗机构内的药品转移,一种多受害者犯罪:转移模式、范围、后果、检测和预防。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jul;87(7):674-82. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.03.013.
9
Room for improvement: nurses' and physicians' views of a post-operative pain management program.改进空间:护士和医生对术后疼痛管理方案的看法。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Mar;54(3):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02161.x. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
10
Pain management: a fundamental human right.疼痛管理:一项基本人权。
Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):205-21. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000268145.52345.55.