Suppr超能文献

在RIPCORD 2、FAME 3、FLOWER-MI和FUTURE研究之后:压力导丝的时代是否已经过去?

After RIPCORD 2, FAME 3, FLOWER-MI and FUTURE: Has the Pressure Wire had its Day?

作者信息

Modi Bhavik, Dutta Subhabrata, Collison Damien, Lampadakis Ioannis, Sen Sayan

机构信息

Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Leicester, UK.

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Interv Cardiol. 2024 Jul 1;19:e09. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.17. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Recent years have seen the publication of several high-profile, negative trials about pressure wires. This has coincided with a consistent increase in the ratio of angioplasty for acute coronary syndromes versus percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease, a greater use of intracoronary imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention and the continued evolution of computational fluid dynamics-derived estimations of fractional flow reserve from both CT and invasive coronary angiography. Consequently, many interventional cardiologists now wonder if the pressure wire will soon become obsolete. This head-to-head article provides a critical appraisal of recent trial data, discusses a potential evolution in how pressure wires are used and debates the motion that the device (and by extension, invasive assessment of coronary physiology) has now had its day.

摘要

近年来,已经发表了几项关于压力导丝的备受瞩目的阴性试验。与此同时,急性冠状动脉综合征的血管成形术与稳定冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比例持续上升,在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间更多地使用冠状动脉内成像,以及基于计算机流体动力学从CT和有创冠状动脉造影得出的血流储备分数估计值的不断发展。因此,许多介入心脏病学家现在怀疑压力导丝是否很快会过时。这篇对比文章对近期试验数据进行了批判性评估,讨论了压力导丝使用方式的潜在演变,并就该设备(以及由此延伸的冠状动脉生理学的有创评估)已过时这一观点展开辩论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d43e/11287625/2fef97cd995a/icr-19-e09-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验