• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性格重要吗:审视性格洞察对于鼓励选择学习资源的个性化助推的价值。

Does personality matter: examining the value of personality insights for personalized nudges that encourage the selection of learning resources.

作者信息

Cardenas Canto Pedro, Dimitrova Vania, Sherman Stuart, Flint Stuart W

机构信息

Scaled Insights, Nexus, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Artif Intell. 2024 Jul 16;7:1211142. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1211142. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/frai.2024.1211142
PMID:39081930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11288178/
Abstract

Nudging is a mechanism aimed at influencing people's behavior while maintaining the individual's freedom of choice. Nudges have been adopted in learning contexts where individuals are responsible for shaping their learning and, at the same time, receive guidance from the system. Not everyone responds to nudges in the same way. While social science research indicates that individual differences play a crucial role in peoples' nudgeability, there has been little research examining computational approaches that explore how individual differences affect user responses to nudges (especially in a learning context). Two studies were conducted to explore how individual differences, specifically focusing on personality, can affect nudge response in the context of healthcare education, where individuals use resources as a part of their informal learning and professional development. Different nudges, designed based on personality characteristics, were provided to draw individual users' attention to educational resources to encourage user engagement. The findings indicate that personality insights can be a predictor for nudge selection, suggesting that different nudges may be more effective when recommending learning resources to people with different personality characteristics.

摘要

助推是一种旨在影响人们行为的机制,同时保持个人的选择自由。助推已在学习情境中得到应用,在这些情境中,个体负责塑造自己的学习,同时接受系统的指导。并非每个人对助推的反应方式都相同。虽然社会科学研究表明个体差异在人们对助推的接受程度中起着关键作用,但很少有研究探讨计算方法,以探究个体差异如何影响用户对助推的反应(尤其是在学习情境中)。我们进行了两项研究,以探讨个体差异,特别是关注人格特质,如何在医疗保健教育情境中影响对助推的反应,在该情境中,个体将资源用作非正式学习和职业发展的一部分。我们提供了基于人格特质设计的不同助推方式,以吸引个体用户对教育资源的关注,从而鼓励用户参与。研究结果表明,人格洞察可以作为助推选择的一个预测指标,这表明在向具有不同人格特质的人推荐学习资源时,不同的助推方式可能会更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/414a66b69819/frai-07-1211142-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/c9e39bfa3713/frai-07-1211142-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/4217a54a9c32/frai-07-1211142-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/bf681f1659cd/frai-07-1211142-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/75d51d5e7454/frai-07-1211142-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/a4558c2a1e17/frai-07-1211142-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/e1f653527892/frai-07-1211142-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/ca4c08daf788/frai-07-1211142-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/38d8df654d40/frai-07-1211142-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/414a66b69819/frai-07-1211142-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/c9e39bfa3713/frai-07-1211142-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/4217a54a9c32/frai-07-1211142-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/bf681f1659cd/frai-07-1211142-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/75d51d5e7454/frai-07-1211142-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/a4558c2a1e17/frai-07-1211142-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/e1f653527892/frai-07-1211142-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/ca4c08daf788/frai-07-1211142-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/38d8df654d40/frai-07-1211142-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069e/11288178/414a66b69819/frai-07-1211142-g0009.jpg

相似文献

1
Does personality matter: examining the value of personality insights for personalized nudges that encourage the selection of learning resources.性格重要吗:审视性格洞察对于鼓励选择学习资源的个性化助推的价值。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Jul 16;7:1211142. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1211142. eCollection 2024.
2
Targeted nudging for speeding behavior: The influence of interpersonal characteristics on responses to in-vehicle road nudges.针对超速行为的定向推动:人际特征对车内道路推动响应的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Sep;204:107638. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107638. Epub 2024 May 29.
3
Under consumers' scrutiny - an investigation into consumers' attitudes and concerns about nudging in the realm of health behavior.在消费者审视之下——关于消费者对健康行为领域助推的态度及担忧的调查
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 9;15:336. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1691-8.
4
Are You "Nudgeable"? Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Healthy Eating Nudges in a Cafeteria Setting.你是否“可引导”?影响自助餐厅中健康饮食提示接受度的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;19(7):4107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074107.
5
Nudgeability: Mapping Conditions of Susceptibility to Nudge Influence.可推动性:分析易受推动影响的条件。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;17(2):346-359. doi: 10.1177/1745691621995183. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
6
Public acceptance of default nudges to promote healthy and sustainable food choices.公众对默认激励措施促进健康和可持续食物选择的接受程度。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 22;23(1):2311. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17127-z.
7
Dilemmas of nudging in public health: an ethical analysis of a Danish pamphlet.公共卫生中的助推困境:对丹麦小册子的伦理分析
Health Promot Int. 2021 Aug 30;36(4):1140-1150. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa146.
8
Digital Nudging for Online Food Choices.在线食品选择的数字助推
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 20;12:729589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.729589. eCollection 2021.
9
Nudges and choice architecture to promote healthy food purchases in adults: A systematized review.推动成年人购买健康食品的助推与选择架构:一项系统评价
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;37(1):87-103. doi: 10.1037/adb0000892. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
10
Optimal nudging for cognitively bounded agents: A framework for modeling, predicting, and controlling the effects of choice architectures.最优助推认知受限主体:用于建模、预测和控制选择架构影响的框架。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Nov;130(6):1457-1491. doi: 10.1037/rev0000445. Epub 2023 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Group recommender systems for tourism: how does personality predict preferences for attractions, travel motivations, preferences and concerns?旅游领域的群体推荐系统:个性如何预测对景点的偏好、旅行动机、偏好及担忧?
User Model User-adapt Interact. 2023 May 15:1-70. doi: 10.1007/s11257-023-09361-2.
2
Personality-targeted persuasive gamified systems: exploring the impact of application domain on the effectiveness of behaviour change strategies.针对个性的说服性游戏化系统:探索应用领域对行为改变策略有效性的影响。
User Model User-adapt Interact. 2022;32(1-2):165-214. doi: 10.1007/s11257-022-09319-w. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
3
Disparate healthcare experiences of people living with overweight or obesity in England.
英国超重或肥胖人群不同的医疗保健经历。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Sep 15;41:101140. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101140. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Nudgeability: Mapping Conditions of Susceptibility to Nudge Influence.可推动性:分析易受推动影响的条件。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;17(2):346-359. doi: 10.1177/1745691621995183. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
5
Cross-sectional analysis to explore the awareness, attitudes and actions of UK adults at high risk of severe illness from COVID-19.横断面分析探讨英国 COVID-19 重症高风险成年人的认知、态度和行为。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 29;10(12):e045309. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045309.
6
Big Five Personality Traits Predict Successful Transitions From School to Vocational Education and Training: A Large-Scale Study.大五人格特质预测从学校到职业教育培训的成功过渡:一项大规模研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 31;11:1827. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01827. eCollection 2020.
7
The longitudinal links of personality traits, values, and well-being and self-esteem: A five-wave study of a nationally representative sample.人格特质、价值观、幸福感和自尊的纵向联系:一项全国代表性样本的五波研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Aug;117(2):448-464. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000212. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
8
Healthy convenience: nudging students toward healthier choices in the lunchroom.健康便利:在餐厅引导学生选择更健康的食物。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Aug;34(3):370-6. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds003. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
9
A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.人格五因素模型与学业成绩的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):322-38. doi: 10.1037/a0014996.
10
The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality.迷你国际个性项目池量表:对人格五因素的微小却有效的测量工具。
Psychol Assess. 2006 Jun;18(2):192-203. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192.