Calvert Peter, Mills Mark T, Howarth Kelly, Aykara Sini, Lunt Lindsay, Brewer Helen, Green David, Green Janet, Moore Simon, Almutawa Jude, Linz Dominik, Lip Gregory Y H, Todd Derick, Gupta Dhiraj
Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Thomas Drive, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK.
Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Drive, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK.
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Apr 15;5(4):461-468. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae028. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is a commonly utilized rhythm control technique for atrial fibrillation. Follow-up typically comprises a hospital visit for 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) two weeks post-DCCV. We report the feasibility, costs, and environmental benefit of remote photoplethysmography (PPG) monitoring as an alternative.
We retrospectively analysed DCCV cases at our centre from May 2020 to October 2022. Patients were stratified into those with remote PPG follow-up and those with traditional 12-lead ECG follow-up. Monitoring type was decided by the specialist nurse performing the DCCV at the time of the procedure after discussing with the patient and offering them both options if appropriate. Outcomes included the proportion of patients who underwent PPG monitoring, patient compliance and experience, and cost, travel, and environmental impact. Four hundred sixteen patients underwent 461 acutely successful DCCV procedures. Two hundred forty-six underwent PPG follow-up whilst 214 underwent ECG follow-up. Patient compliance was high (PPG 89.4% vs. ECG 89.8%; > 0.999) and the majority of PPG users (90%) found the app easy to use. Sinus rhythm was maintained in 71.1% (PPG) and 64.7% (ECG) of patients ( = 0.161). Twenty-nine (11.8%) PPG patients subsequently required an ECG either due to non-compliance, technical failure, or inconclusive PPG readings. Despite this, mean healthcare costs (£47.91 vs. £135 per patient; < 0.001) and median cost to the patient (£0 vs. £5.97; < 0.001) were lower with PPG. Median travel time per patient (0 vs. 44 min; < 0.001) and CO emissions (0 vs. 3.59 kg; < 0.001) were also lower with PPG. No safety issues were identified.
Remote PPG monitoring is a viable method of assessing for arrhythmia recurrence post-DCCV. This approach may save patients significant travel time, reduce environmental CO emission, and be cost saving in a publicly-funded healthcare system.
直流电复律(DCCV)是一种常用于房颤的节律控制技术。随访通常包括在DCCV后两周进行一次12导联心电图(ECG)的门诊检查。我们报告了作为一种替代方法的远程光电容积脉搏波描记法(PPG)监测的可行性、成本和环境效益。
我们回顾性分析了2020年5月至2022年10月在我们中心进行的DCCV病例。患者被分为接受远程PPG随访的患者和接受传统12导联ECG随访的患者。监测类型由进行DCCV的专科护士在操作时与患者讨论并在适当情况下为其提供两种选择后决定。结果包括接受PPG监测的患者比例、患者依从性和体验,以及成本、出行和环境影响。416例患者接受了461次急性成功的DCCV操作。246例接受PPG随访,214例接受ECG随访。患者依从性较高(PPG为89.4%,ECG为89.8%;P>0.999),大多数PPG使用者(90%)认为该应用程序易于使用。71.1%(PPG)和64.7%(ECG)的患者维持窦性心律(P=0.161)。29例(11.8%)PPG患者随后因不依从、技术故障或PPG读数不确定而需要进行ECG检查。尽管如此,PPG的平均医疗成本(每位患者47.91英镑对135英镑;P<0.001)和患者的中位数成本(0英镑对5.97英镑;P<0.001)更低。每位患者的出行时间中位数(0分钟对44分钟;P<0.001)和二氧化碳排放量(0千克对3.59千克;P<0.001)也更低。未发现安全问题。
远程PPG监测是评估DCCV后心律失常复发的一种可行方法。这种方法可以为患者节省大量出行时间,减少环境二氧化碳排放,并在公共资助的医疗系统中节省成本。