Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Institute of Pharmacology, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023 May 25;22(4):412-424. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvac061.
The aim of this TeleCheck-AF sub-analysis was to evaluate motivation and adherence to on-demand heart rate/rhythm monitoring app in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
Patients were instructed to perform 60 s app-based heart rate/rhythm recordings 3 times daily and in case of symptoms for 7 consecutive days prior to teleconsultation. Motivation was defined as number of days in which the expected number of measurements (≥3/day) were performed per number of days over the entire prescription period. Adherence was defined as number of performed measurements per number of expected measurements over the entire prescription period.Data from 990 consecutive patients with diagnosed AF [median age 64 (57-71) years, 39% female] from 10 centres were analyzed. Patients with both optimal motivation (100%) and adherence (≥100%) constituted 28% of the study population and had a lower percentage of recordings in sinus rhythm [90 (53-100%) vs. 100 (64-100%), P < 0.001] compared with others. Older age and absence of diabetes were predictors of both optimal motivation and adherence [odds ratio (OR) 1.02, 95% coincidence interval (95% CI): 1.01-1.04, P < 0.001 and OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.86, P = 0.013, respectively]. Patients with 100% motivation also had ≥100% adherence. Independent predictors for optimal adherence alone were older age (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04, P = 0.014), female sex (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.29-2.23, P < 0.001), previous AF ablation (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03-1.07, P = 0.028).
In the TeleCheck-AF project, more than one-fourth of patients had optimal motivation and adherence to app-based heart rate/rhythm monitoring. Older age and absence of diabetes were predictors of optimal motivation/adherence.
本项 TeleCheck-AF 子分析旨在评估患有心房颤动(AF)的患者对按需心率/节律监测应用程序的动机和依从性。
患者被指示在 teleconsultation 前的 7 天内,每天进行 3 次持续 60 秒的基于应用程序的心率/节律记录,并且在有症状的情况下进行记录。动机被定义为在整个处方期内,预期测量次数(≥3 次/天)的天数与总天数之比。依从性被定义为在整个处方期内,实际测量次数与预期测量次数之比。
来自 10 个中心的 990 例连续确诊为 AF 的患者[中位年龄 64(57-71)岁,39%为女性]的数据进行了分析。具有最佳动机(100%)和依从性(≥100%)的患者占研究人群的 28%,且窦性节律的记录百分比较低[90(53-100%)比 100(64-100%),P < 0.001]。年龄较大和无糖尿病是最佳动机和依从性的预测因素[比值比(OR)1.02,95%置信区间(95%CI):1.01-1.04,P < 0.001 和 OR:0.49,95%CI:0.28-0.86,P = 0.013]。具有 100%动机的患者也具有≥100%的依从性。最佳依从性的独立预测因素是年龄较大(OR:1.02,95%CI:1.00-1.04,P = 0.014)、女性(OR:1.70,95%CI:1.29-2.23,P < 0.001)、既往 AF 消融(OR:1.35,95%CI:1.03-1.07,P = 0.028)。
在 TeleCheck-AF 项目中,超过四分之一的患者对基于应用程序的心率/节律监测具有最佳的动机和依从性。年龄较大和无糖尿病是最佳动机/依从性的预测因素。