Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, India.
Department of Biological Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology and Sciences, Pilani, India.
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2024;20(6):e300724232473. doi: 10.2174/011573403X309363240730095253.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) continue to be the primary cause of mortality globally and invariably in India as well. The rapid upsurge in the prevalence of CVDs in India has created a pressing need to promote contemporary, sustainable, and cost-effective interventions to tackle the CVD burden. This systematic review integrates the research-based evidence of the cost-effectiveness of various interventions that can be adapted to control CVDs in India.
Databases, namely, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar, were searched for data on the economic evaluation of interventions targeting CVD based on the Indian population for a period of 30 years (1991-2021). Two reviewers assessed the articles for eligibility, and data were extracted from the shortlisted articles as per a predefined template, including the quantification of methodological aspects.
In total, 1249 studies were examined, out of which 23 completely met the inclusion criteria for full-text review. A total of 16 studies were based solely on the Indian population, while the rest (7) included South Asia/Asia for the intervention, of which India was a participant nation. Most of the economic evaluations targeted treatment-based or pharmacological interventions (14) for CVDs. The evaluations were based on Decision-based models (10), Randomized controlled Trials (RCTs) (9), and Observational studies (4). The cost-effectiveness ratio for the included studies exhibited a diverse range due to variations in methodological approaches, such as differences in study settings, populations, and inconsistencies in study design. The mean ICER (Incremental Cost-effectiveness ratio) for primordial and primary preventions was found to be 3073.8 (US $2022) and 17489.9 (US $2022), respectively. Moreover, the combined mean value for secondary and tertiary prevention was 2029.6 (US$2022).
The economic evidence of public health interventions are expanding, but their focus is restricted towards pharmacological interventions. There is an urgency to emphasize primordial and primary prevention for better outcomes in health economics decision-making. Technology- based avenues for intervention need more exploration in order to cater to a large population like India.
心血管疾病(CVDs)仍然是全球,而且在印度也是主要的死亡原因。印度 CVD 患病率的迅速上升,迫切需要推广现代、可持续和具有成本效益的干预措施来应对 CVD 负担。本系统评价综合了针对印度 CVD 控制可采用的各种干预措施的基于研究证据的成本效益。
本研究检索了 30 年来(1991-2021 年)针对印度人口的 CVD 干预措施的经济评价相关数据库,包括 PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase 和 Google Scholar。两名审查员评估了文章的合格性,并根据预定义模板从入选文章中提取数据,包括量化方法学方面。
共检查了 1249 项研究,其中 23 项完全符合全文审查的纳入标准。共有 16 项研究完全基于印度人口,其余 7 项研究(7 项)包括南亚/亚洲的干预措施,印度是其中一个参与国。大多数经济评估针对 CVD 的治疗或药物干预(14 项)。评估基于决策模型(10 项)、随机对照试验(RCTs)(9 项)和观察性研究(4 项)。由于方法学方法的差异,如研究环境、人群的差异以及研究设计的不一致性,纳入研究的成本效益比呈现出广泛的范围。初级和一级预防的平均增量成本效益比(ICER)分别为 3073.8(2022 年美元)和 17489.9(2022 年美元)。此外,二级和三级预防的综合平均值为 2029.6(2022 年美元)。
公共卫生干预的经济证据正在扩大,但重点仅限于药物干预。迫切需要强调初级和一级预防,以在卫生经济学决策中取得更好的结果。需要更多地探索干预的技术途径,以满足印度这样的庞大人口需求。