• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险自服药调查问卷针对健康素养的有效性证据。

Evidence of validity of the Risk Self-Medication Questionnaire focused on Health Literacy.

机构信息

Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte. Pau dos Ferros, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

Universidade Federal do Ceará, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Jul 29;77(3):e20230386. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0386. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0386
PMID:39082543
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11290745/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

to analyze the validity evidence of the internal structure of the Risk Self-Medication Questionnaire Focused on Health Literacy.

METHODS

a psychometric study with 499 adults. The internal structure was assessed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to prove the adjustment. Internal consistency was measured by composite reliability and McDonald's omega coefficient (ω).

RESULTS

the parameters revealed a model of 35 items distributed across four factors, explaining 56% of the total variance, with factor loadings ranging from 0.31 to 0.85 and adequate communalities. Accuracy (0.79<ORION<0.98), representativeness (0.89<FDI<0.99), sensitivity (1.92<SR<7.07), factor hope (88.3%< EPTD<97.9%), replicability (0.82<H-Latent<H-observed<0.87) and reliability (ω=0.87) were adequate. The composite reliability ranged from 0.840 to 0.910. Furthermore, good model fit was achieved (TLI = 0.99; CFI = 0.99; GFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.02 and RMSR = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

an instrument was obtained with good evidence of structural validity for measuring self-medication.

摘要

目的

分析健康素养为重点的自我药疗风险问卷的内部结构的效度证据。

方法

对 499 名成年人进行了一项心理测量学研究。采用探索性和验证性因子分析来评估内部结构,以证明调整的合理性。内部一致性通过综合可靠性和麦克唐纳的 ω 系数(ω)来衡量。

结果

参数显示了一个由 35 个项目组成的模型,分布在四个因素中,解释了总方差的 56%,因子负荷范围从 0.31 到 0.85,且具有足够的共同度。准确性(0.79<ORION<0.98)、代表性(0.89<FDI<0.99)、敏感性(1.92<SR<7.07)、希望因子(88.3%< EPTD<97.9%)、可重复性(0.82<H-Latent<H-observed<0.87)和可靠性(ω=0.87)均较为充分。综合可靠性范围为 0.840 至 0.910。此外,模型拟合度良好(TLI = 0.99;CFI = 0.99;GFI = 0.95;RMSEA = 0.02,RMSR = 0.05)。

结论

该工具获得了良好的结构有效性证据,可用于测量自我药疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33fc/11290745/8f85af8ddcd4/0034-7167-reben-77-03-e20230386-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33fc/11290745/a10bfaa5ff03/0034-7167-reben-77-03-e20230386-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33fc/11290745/8f85af8ddcd4/0034-7167-reben-77-03-e20230386-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33fc/11290745/a10bfaa5ff03/0034-7167-reben-77-03-e20230386-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33fc/11290745/8f85af8ddcd4/0034-7167-reben-77-03-e20230386-gf02.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence of validity of the Risk Self-Medication Questionnaire focused on Health Literacy.风险自服药调查问卷针对健康素养的有效性证据。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Jul 29;77(3):e20230386. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0386. eCollection 2024.
2
Structure internal of the dimension Human Person of the Questionnaire of Health Vulnerability in Heart Failure.健康脆弱性心力衰竭问卷的人类个体维度的结构内部。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022 Dec 16;56:e20220117. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0117en. eCollection 2022.
3
Development and validation of a short and easy-to-use instrument for measuring health literacy: the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA).开发和验证一种简短易用的成人健康素养测量工具:成人健康素养量表(HELIA)。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 12;20(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08787-2.
4
Validation of the mild cognitive impairment health literacy assessment scale (MCI-HLA scale) in middle-aged and older adults.验证轻度认知障碍健康素养评估量表(MCI-HLA 量表)在中老年人群中的适用性。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2023 Nov;89:103771. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103771. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
5
Measuring cancer caregiver health literacy: Validation of the Health Literacy of Caregivers Scale-Cancer (HLCS-C) in an Australian population.测量癌症护理者的健康素养:澳大利亚人群中护理者健康素养量表-癌症版(HLCS-C)的验证
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):330-344. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12524. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
6
Psychometric properties of the Latino Students Patient Safety Questionnaire, Brazilian version.《拉丁裔学生患者安全问卷》巴西文版的心理测量学特性。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 Feb 6;76(2):e20210961. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0961. eCollection 2023.
7
Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Oral Health Literacy Assessment in Spanish and development of a shortened form of the instrument.评估西班牙语版巴西口腔健康素养评估量表的心理测量特性,并开发该工具的简化形式。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 29;13(11):e0207989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207989. eCollection 2018.
8
Validation of the menopause representation questionnaire (MenoSentations-Q) among Iranian women and cross-cultural comparison with Portuguese women.伊朗女性中更年期表征问卷(MenoSentations-Q)的验证及与葡萄牙女性的跨文化比较。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03606-5.
9
Psychometric properties of an oral health literacy scale for people living with diabetes.用于糖尿病患者的口腔健康素养量表的心理测量学特性。
Braz Oral Res. 2023 Mar 31;37:e022. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0022. eCollection 2023.
10
Validation and evaluation of the Mandarin version of the oral health literacy adult questionnaire in Taiwan.验证和评估台湾地区中文版口腔健康素养成人问卷。
Public Health Nurs. 2020 Mar;37(2):303-309. doi: 10.1111/phn.12688. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Structure internal of the dimension Human Person of the Questionnaire of Health Vulnerability in Heart Failure.健康脆弱性心力衰竭问卷的人类个体维度的结构内部。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022 Dec 16;56:e20220117. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0117en. eCollection 2022.
2
Prioritizing intervention measures to prevent inappropriate self-medication practices using the Analytical Hierarchy Process.运用层次分析法确定预防不当自我药疗行为的干预措施优先级。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022 Feb 26;5:100117. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100117. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Self-Medication Practices with Antibiotics and Associated Factors among the Public of Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
马来西亚公众使用抗生素的自我药疗行为及相关因素:一项横断面研究
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2021 Oct 28;13:171-181. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S331427. eCollection 2021.
4
Prevalence and predictors of self-medication drugs to prevent or treat COVID-19: Experience from a Middle Eastern country.预防或治疗 COVID-19 而自我用药的流行情况和预测因素:来自中东国家的经验。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14860. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14860. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
5
Predictors of self-medication with herbal remedies during pregnancy based on the theory of planned behavior in Kashan, Iran.基于计划行为理论的伊朗卡尚地区孕妇自我药疗草药预测因素。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03353-8.
6
Medication literacy: A conceptual model.药物素养:概念模型。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Apr;18(4):2675-2682. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
7
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Over-the-Counter Drugs Among Pharmacy and Medical Students: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study.药学和医学生对非处方药的知识、态度及实践:一项基于机构的横断面研究。
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2020 Sep 15;9:135-146. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S266786. eCollection 2020.
8
Validity and reliability study of the Moral Distress Questionnaire in Turkish for nurses.土耳其语护士道德困扰问卷的效度和信度研究。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3319. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2960.3319. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
9
Assessing the Quality and Appropriateness of Factor Solutions and Factor Score Estimates in Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.评估探索性项目因子分析中因子解和因子得分估计的质量与适宜性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):762-780. doi: 10.1177/0013164417719308. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
10
Self-medication practices and their characteristics among French university students.法国大学生的自我药疗行为及其特征。
Therapie. 2020 Sep-Oct;75(5):419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2020.02.019. Epub 2020 Feb 25.