Suppr超能文献

作为社会科学的医学:鲁道夫·菲尔绍论上西里西亚的斑疹伤寒疫情

Medicine as social science: Rudolf Virchow on the typhus epidemic in Upper Silesia.

作者信息

Taylor R, Rieger A

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1985;15(4):547-59. doi: 10.2190/XX9V-ACD4-KUXD-C0E5.

Abstract

Rudolf Virchow's Report on the 1848 typhus epidemic is one of the neglected classics of "social medicine"--a term he did much to popularize. His analysis of the epidemic emphasized the economic, social, and cultural factors involved in its etiology, and clearly identified the contradictory social forces that prevented any simple solution. Instead of recommending medical changes (i.e., more doctors or hospitals), he outlined a revolutionary program of social reconstruction; including full employment, higher wages, the establishment of agricultural cooperatives, universal education, and the disestablishment of the Catholic Church. This article includes the first English translation of these long-term recommendations. It also locates Virchow's Report within the context of the Medical Reform Movement of 1848 and traces his influence on the subsequent development of social medicine. Parallels are drawn between Virchow's attempts to reform health care and current developments in the political economy of health.

摘要

鲁道夫·菲尔绍关于1848年斑疹伤寒疫情的报告是“社会医学”中被忽视的经典著作之一——他为普及这一术语做出了很大贡献。他对疫情的分析强调了病因学中涉及的经济、社会和文化因素,并明确指出了阻碍任何简单解决方案的矛盾社会力量。他没有建议进行医疗变革(即增加医生或医院),而是概述了一项社会重建的革命计划;包括充分就业、提高工资、建立农业合作社、普及教育以及废除天主教会。本文首次将这些长期建议翻译成英文。它还将菲尔绍的报告置于1848年医学改革运动的背景下,并追溯他对社会医学后续发展的影响。文中还对菲尔绍改革医疗保健的尝试与当前卫生政治经济学的发展进行了比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验