• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新政治化世界卫生组织的健康社会决定因素框架。

Re-politicizing the WHO's social determinants of health framework.

机构信息

Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, 51 E. River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2024 Oct 1;39(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae122.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/daae122
PMID:39322424
Abstract

Although the World Health Organization's (WHO's) framework on social and structural determinants of health and health inequities (SSDHHI) has done much to raise awareness of these determinants, it does not go far enough in considerations of politics and power. The framework has become more de-politicized since its publication, with the definition of social determinants shifting toward downstream and individualized factors. In the meantime, new research fields on legal, commercial and political determinants of health and health inequities have emerged; however, these have not become integrated adequately into broader SSDHHI frameworks. To address these challenges, we argue for a re-politicization and an expansion of the WHO's framework by including the agents who have power over shaping structural determinants and the ways they use power to shape these determinants. We also provide a more detailed conceptualization of structural determinants to facilitate research. We propose a guideline for evaluating studies according to the extent to which they point upstream versus downstream and incorporate agents and considerations of power. We then use this framework to encourage more research on associations among agents, mechanisms of power, and structural determinants; how changes in structural determinants affect power dynamics among agents; and a wider focus on structural determinants beyond laws and policies, such as broad economic and sociopolitical systems. We also urge researchers to consider societal and institutional forces shaping their research with respect to SSDHHI. Research based on this framework can be used to provide evidence for advocacy for structural changes and to build more just systems that respect the fundamental human right to a healthy life.

摘要

尽管世界卫生组织(WHO)关于社会和结构性决定因素及其对健康和健康不公平的影响的框架(SSDHHI)在提高对这些决定因素的认识方面做了很多工作,但在政治和权力方面的考虑还远远不够。自该框架发布以来,其社会决定因素的定义已经越来越淡化,转向下游和个体化因素。与此同时,关于健康和健康不公平的法律、商业和政治决定因素的新研究领域已经出现;然而,这些因素并没有充分融入更广泛的 SSDHHI 框架中。为了解决这些挑战,我们主张通过纳入对塑造结构性决定因素有权力的行为体以及他们利用权力塑造这些决定因素的方式,重新政治化和扩大世卫组织的框架。我们还提供了对结构性决定因素的更详细概念化,以促进研究。我们提出了一个根据研究指向上游还是下游的程度以及纳入行为体和权力考虑因素来评估研究的准则。然后,我们使用这个框架来鼓励更多地研究行为体之间的关联、权力机制和结构性决定因素;结构性决定因素的变化如何影响行为体之间的权力动态;以及更广泛地关注超越法律和政策的结构性决定因素,例如广泛的经济和社会政治制度。我们还敦促研究人员考虑塑造其 SSDHHI 研究的社会和制度力量。基于该框架的研究可以用于为结构性变革提供证据,并建立更公正的尊重享有健康生活的基本人权的系统。

相似文献

1
Re-politicizing the WHO's social determinants of health framework.重新政治化世界卫生组织的健康社会决定因素框架。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Oct 1;39(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae122.
2
Keeping It Political and Powerful: Defining the Structural Determinants of Health.保持政治和权力:定义健康的结构决定因素。
Milbank Q. 2024 Jun;102(2):351-366. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12695. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
3
The equitable aging in health conceptual framework: international interventions infusing power and justice to address social isolation and loneliness among older adults.健康领域公平老龄化概念框架:为解决老年人社会隔离和孤独问题注入力量与正义的国际干预措施。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 10;13:1426015. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1426015. eCollection 2025.
4
The case for the World Health Organization's Commission on Social Determinants of Health to address gender identity.世界卫生组织健康问题社会决定因素委员会应对性别认同问题的理由。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105(3):e58-62. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302373. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
5
Power asymmetries in global governance for health: a conceptual framework for analyzing the political-economic determinants of health inequities.全球卫生治理中的权力不对称:分析健康不平等的政治经济决定因素的概念框架。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0516-4.
6
Tuberculosis结核病
7
Determinants of Inequities in Neurologic Disease, Health, and Well-being: The NINDS Social Determinants of Health Framework.神经疾病、健康和福祉不平等的决定因素:NINDS 健康社会决定因素框架。
Neurology. 2023 Aug 15;101(7 Suppl 1):S75-S81. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207566.
8
Political determinants of digital health: beyond the rainbow.数字健康的政治决定因素:超越彩虹
Health Promot Int. 2025 Mar 5;40(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf014.
9
Inequities in the distribution of COVID-19: an adaptation of WHO's conceptual framework.COVID-19 分布的不公平现象:对世卫组织概念框架的改编。
Gac Sanit. 2022 Sep-Oct;36(5):488-492. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
10
Politics, policies and processes: a multidisciplinary and multimethods research programme on policies on the social determinants of health inequity in Australia.政治、政策与流程:澳大利亚社会决定因素健康不公平政策的多学科、多方法研究计划。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e017772. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017772.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of organ damage from COVID and Long COVID: a disease with a spectrum of pathology.新冠病毒感染及新冠长期症状引发的器官损伤综述:一种具有多种病理表现的疾病
Med Rev (2021). 2024 Jul 2;5(1):66-75. doi: 10.1515/mr-2024-0030. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Long COVID science, research and policy.长新冠科学、研究与政策。
Nat Med. 2024 Aug;30(8):2148-2164. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03173-6. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
3
Three-year outcomes of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.COVID-19 后急性后遗症的三年结局。
Nat Med. 2024 Jun;30(6):1564-1573. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02987-8. Epub 2024 May 30.
4
Screening tools to address social determinants of health in the United States: A systematic review.美国用于解决健康问题社会决定因素的筛查工具:一项系统综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr 5;8(1):e60. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.506. eCollection 2024.
5
NHS and the whole of society must act on social determinants of health for a healthier future.国民保健服务体系及整个社会必须针对健康的社会决定因素采取行动,以创造更健康的未来。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 11;385:e079389. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079389.
6
Money as Medicine - Clinicism, Cash Transfers, and the Political-Economic Determinants of Health.金钱即良药——临床主义、现金转移与健康的政治经济决定因素
N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 11;390(14):1333-1338. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2311216.
7
Keeping It Political and Powerful: Defining the Structural Determinants of Health.保持政治和权力:定义健康的结构决定因素。
Milbank Q. 2024 Jun;102(2):351-366. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12695. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
8
1965 US Voting Rights Act Impact on Black and Black Versus White Infant Death Rates in Jim Crow States, 1959-1980 and 2017-2021.1965年《美国选举权法案》对1959 - 1980年以及2017 - 2021年吉姆·克劳法州黑人与白人婴儿死亡率的影响
Am J Public Health. 2024 Mar;114(3):300-308. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307518. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
9
Multisector Collaboration vs. Social Democracy for Addressing Social Determinants of Health.多部门协作与社会民主在解决健康社会决定因素方面的比较
Milbank Q. 2024 Jun;102(2):280-301. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12685. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
10
Is fair representation good for children? effects of electoral partisan bias in state legislatures on policies affecting children's health and well-being.公平代表制对儿童有益吗?州议会选举党派偏见对影响儿童健康和福祉的政策的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;339:116344. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116344. Epub 2023 Nov 14.