Istanbul Aydin University, Institute of Graduate Education, Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University, Faculty of Health Science, Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Bandirma, Turkey.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Sep;300:327-336. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.07.033. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and modified pilates exercises (MPE) in elderly women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Both randomized groups [Group 1: PFMT (n = 17), Group 2: MPE (n = 17)] performed their exercises twice a week for 12 weeks. Incontinence Severity Index (ISI), Urogenital Distress Inventory-Short Form (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form (IIQ-7) were used to assess SUI frequency and level of exposure from symptoms, electromyography (EMG) device was used to assess PFM activation response and a stabilizer was used to assess transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle strength. The assessments were performed at baseline and at week 12.
While in-group assessment there were statistically significant differences in ISI, UDI-6, IIQ-7 in both groups at week 12 (p < 0.05); in the assessment between groups, there were statistically significant difference for EMG-work avarage (U = 60.00, P = 0.02), EMG-work peak (U = 62,50, P = 0.03) and EMG-rest peak (U = 61,50, P = 0.03) in favor of Group 1 and TrA muscle strength (U = 61.00, P = 0.02) in favor of Group 2 from baseline to week 12 (p < 0.05).
In summary, MPE can be considered alternative and safe exercise in clinic for elderly women with SUI who do not want to receive PFMT for various reasons.
本研究旨在比较盆底肌训练(PFMT)和改良普拉提运动(MPE)对老年压力性尿失禁(SUI)女性的疗效。
两组随机分组[组 1:PFMT(n=17),组 2:MPE(n=17)]每周进行两次运动,共 12 周。采用尿失禁严重程度指数(ISI)、尿失禁生活质量问卷-6 项(UDI-6)和尿失禁对生活质量影响问卷-7 项(IIQ-7)评估 SUI 频率和症状暴露程度,肌电图(EMG)设备评估 PFM 激活反应,稳定器评估腹横肌(TrA)肌肉力量。在基线和第 12 周进行评估。
组内评估显示,两组在第 12 周时 ISI、UDI-6 和 IIQ-7 均有统计学差异(p<0.05);组间评估显示,两组在 EMG 平均功(U=60.00,P=0.02)、EMG 峰值功(U=62,50,P=0.03)和 EMG 静息峰值(U=61,50,P=0.03)方面存在统计学差异,而组 1 更优,在 TrA 肌肉力量方面(U=61.00,P=0.02),组 2 更优,均从基线到第 12 周(p<0.05)。
总之,对于因各种原因不想接受 PFMT 的老年 SUI 女性,MPE 可以作为替代且安全的临床运动方式。