• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习预测下腔静脉滤器并发症。

Predicting inferior vena cava filter complications using machine learning.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Vascular Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Temerty Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research and Education in Medicine (T-CAIREM), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Nov;12(6):101943. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101943. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101943
PMID:39084408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11523346/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement is associated with important long-term complications. Predictive models for filter-related complications may help guide clinical decision-making but remain limited. We developed machine learning (ML) algorithms that predict 1-year IVC filter complications using preoperative data.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative database was used to identify patients who underwent IVC filter placement between 2013 and 2024. We identified 77 preoperative demographic and clinical features from the index hospitalization when the filter was placed. The primary outcome was 1-year filter-related complications (composite of filter thrombosis, migration, angulation, fracture, and embolization or fragmentation, vein perforation, new caval or iliac vein thrombosis, new pulmonary embolism, access site thrombosis, or failed retrieval). The data were divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Six ML models were trained using preoperative features with 10-fold cross-validation (Extreme Gradient Boosting, random forest, Naïve Bayes classifier, support vector machine, artificial neural network, and logistic regression). The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Model robustness was assessed using calibration plot and Brier score. Performance was evaluated across subgroups based on age, sex, race, ethnicity, rurality, median Area Deprivation Index, planned duration of filter, landing site of filter, and presence of prior IVC filter placement.

RESULTS

Overall, 14,476 patients underwent IVC filter placement and 584 (4.0%) experienced 1-year filter-related complications. Patients with a primary outcome were younger (59.3 ± 16.7 years vs 63.8 ± 16.0 years; P < .001) and more likely to have thrombotic risk factors including thrombophilia, prior venous thromboembolism (VTE), and family history of VTE. The best prediction model was Extreme Gradient Boosting, achieving an AUROC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.94). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC of 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.65). Calibration plot showed good agreement between predicted/observed event probabilities with a Brier score of 0.07. The top 10 predictors of 1-year filter-related complications were (1) thrombophilia, (2) prior VTE, (3) antiphospholipid antibodies, (4) factor V Leiden mutation, (5) family history of VTE, (6) planned duration of IVC filter (temporary), (7) unable to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation, (8) malignancy, (9) recent or active bleeding, and (10) age. Model performance remained robust across all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed ML models that can accurately predict 1-year IVC filter complications, performing better than logistic regression. These algorithms have potential to guide patient selection for filter placement, counselling, perioperative management, and follow-up to mitigate filter-related complications and improve outcomes.

摘要

目的

下腔静脉(IVC)滤器置入与重要的长期并发症相关。预测滤器相关并发症的模型可能有助于指导临床决策,但仍存在局限性。我们开发了机器学习(ML)算法,使用术前数据预测 1 年 IVC 滤器并发症。

方法

使用血管质量倡议(Vascular Quality Initiative)数据库确定 2013 年至 2024 年间接受 IVC 滤器置入的患者。我们从放置滤器的索引住院期间确定了 77 个术前人口统计学和临床特征。主要结局是 1 年滤器相关并发症(复合血栓形成、迁移、成角、骨折和栓塞或碎裂、静脉穿孔、新腔静脉或髂静脉血栓形成、新的肺栓塞、入路血栓形成或取回失败)。数据分为训练(70%)和测试(30%)集。使用 10 倍交叉验证(极端梯度增强、随机森林、朴素贝叶斯分类器、支持向量机、人工神经网络和逻辑回归)使用术前特征训练了 6 个 ML 模型。主要模型评估指标是接收器操作特征曲线下的面积(AUROC)。使用校准图和 Brier 分数评估模型稳健性。根据年龄、性别、种族、民族、农村程度、中位区域剥夺指数、滤器计划持续时间、滤器着陆点和既往 IVC 滤器置入情况,根据亚组评估性能。

结果

总体而言,14476 名患者接受了 IVC 滤器置入,584 名(4.0%)发生了 1 年滤器相关并发症。主要结局患者更年轻(59.3±16.7 岁 vs 63.8±16.0 岁;P<.001),且更可能存在血栓形成危险因素,包括血栓形成倾向、既往静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)和 VTE 家族史。最佳预测模型是极端梯度增强,AUROC 为 0.93(95%置信区间,0.92-0.94)。相比之下,逻辑回归的 AUROC 为 0.63(95%置信区间,0.61-0.65)。校准图显示预测/观察到的事件概率之间具有良好的一致性,Brier 得分为 0.07。1 年滤器相关并发症的前 10 个预测因素是(1)血栓形成倾向,(2)既往 VTE,(3)抗磷脂抗体,(4)因子 V Leiden 突变,(5)VTE 家族史,(6)IVC 滤器计划持续时间(临时),(7)无法维持治疗性抗凝,(8)恶性肿瘤,(9)近期或活动性出血,(10)年龄。模型性能在所有亚组中均保持稳健。

结论

我们开发了能够准确预测 1 年 IVC 滤器并发症的 ML 模型,其性能优于逻辑回归。这些算法有可能指导滤器放置、咨询、围手术期管理和随访,以减轻滤器相关并发症并改善结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/122a/11523346/6206817cc46a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/122a/11523346/f72ca8c370b8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/122a/11523346/4fd2309a854e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/122a/11523346/6206817cc46a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/122a/11523346/f72ca8c370b8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/122a/11523346/4fd2309a854e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/122a/11523346/6206817cc46a/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting inferior vena cava filter complications using machine learning.使用机器学习预测下腔静脉滤器并发症。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Nov;12(6):101943. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101943. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following suprainguinal bypass.使用机器学习预测腹股沟上旁路术后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):593-608.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.09.037. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Contemporary rates of inferior vena cava filter thrombosis and risk factors.当代下腔静脉滤器血栓形成的发生率及危险因素。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Mar;10(2):313-324. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.07.016. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
4
Comprehensive assessment of prophylactic preoperative inferior vena cava filters for major spinal reconstruction in adults.成人大型脊柱重建术预防性术前下腔静脉滤器的综合评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 1;37(13):1122-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824abde2.
5
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.使用机器学习预测开放式腹主动脉瘤修复术后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Dec;78(6):1426-1438.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.08.121. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
6
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following carotid endarterectomy.使用机器学习预测颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Oct;78(4):973-987.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.024. Epub 2023 May 20.
7
Extreme obesity is associated with angulation during inferior vena cava filter placement.极度肥胖与下腔静脉滤器放置时的角度有关。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jul;8(4):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.10.022. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
Immediate and delayed complications of inferior vena cava filters.下腔静脉滤器的即刻和延迟并发症
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023 May;11(3):587-594.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
9
Inferior Vena Cava Filter Long Term Complications and Retrieval Techniques: A Case Series and Literature Review.下腔静脉滤器长期并发症及取出技术:病例系列及文献复习。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2024 Jul;58(5):559-566. doi: 10.1177/15385744231226048. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
10
Independent association between IVC filter placement and VTE risk in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and isolated distal DVT: A retrospective cohort study.上消化道出血合并孤立性远端下肢深静脉血栓患者中静脉滤器置入与静脉血栓栓塞风险的独立相关性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Vasc Med. 2024 Aug;29(4):424-432. doi: 10.1177/1358863X241240442. Epub 2024 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in clinical thrombosis and hemostasis: A review.临床血栓形成与止血中的人工智能:综述
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025 Jul 24;9(5):102984. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102984. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Predictive Model of Internal Bleeding in Elderly Aspirin Users Using XGBoost Machine Learning.基于XGBoost机器学习的老年阿司匹林使用者内出血预测模型
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Sep 18;17:2255-2269. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S478826. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
2
Pruning-based oversampling technique with smoothed bootstrap resampling for imbalanced clinical dataset of Covid-19.基于剪枝的过采样技术与平滑自助重采样用于新冠疫情不平衡临床数据集
J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. 2022 Oct;34(9):7830-7839. doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.09.021. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
3
Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes of Endovascular Intervention for Patients With PAD.
机器学习预测 PAD 患者血管内介入治疗的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242350. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2350.
4
Using Machine Learning (XGBoost) to Predict Outcomes After Infrainguinal Bypass for Peripheral Artery Disease.使用机器学习(XGBoost)预测下肢旁路手术后外周动脉疾病的预后
Ann Surg. 2024 Apr 1;279(4):705-713. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006181. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
5
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following suprainguinal bypass.使用机器学习预测腹股沟上旁路术后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):593-608.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.09.037. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Machine learning to predict outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.基于机器学习的腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后结局预测。
Br J Surg. 2023 Nov 9;110(12):1840-1849. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad287.
7
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.使用机器学习预测开放式腹主动脉瘤修复术后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Dec;78(6):1426-1438.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.08.121. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
8
Venous thromboembolism mortality and trends in older US adults, 2011-2019.2011-2019 年美国老年人群静脉血栓栓塞死亡率及趋势。
Am J Hematol. 2023 Sep;98(9):1364-1373. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26996. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
9
Inferior Vena Cava Filters and Complications: A Systematic Review.下腔静脉滤器与并发症:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Jun 6;15(6):e40038. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40038. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following carotid endarterectomy.使用机器学习预测颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Oct;78(4):973-987.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.024. Epub 2023 May 20.