• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较包茎与非包茎男孩的阴茎问题:基于大型商业理赔数据库的分析,重点关注施行包皮环切术的医生类型

Comparing Penile Problems in Circumcised vs. Uncircumcised Boys: Insights From a Large Commercial Claims Database With a Focus on Provider Type Performing Circumcision.

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA; Surgical Population Analysis Research Core, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Nov;59(11):161614. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.06.022. Epub 2024 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.06.022
PMID:39084960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11486584/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare penile problems in circumcised relative to uncircumcised boys, and to determine which providers performing the circumcision have fewer post-circumcision problems.

METHODS

CPT codes in the 2011-2020 MarketScan database were used to identify boys who had a circumcision. Uncircumcised control subjects of the same age, state of residence, and insurance type were selected. The primary outcome was a penile problem, defined as penis-specific infection, inflammation, and urethral stricture/stenosis, among others. The secondary outcomes were procedure-related complications limited to 28 days after circumcision, and whether post-circumcision problems varied by the clinician performing the procedure. ICD-9/10 diagnostic codes were used to identify these problems.

RESULTS

We identified ∼850,000 cases and ∼850,000 matched controls. Overall, the rate of penile problems within the first five years of life was 1.7% in circumcised boys versus 0.5% in uncircumcised boys (p < 0.05). Multivariable regression models showed that the risk of penile problems was 2.9-fold higher among circumcised compared to uncircumcised males (95%CI [2.8-3], p < 0.001). Compared to males circumcised by pediatricians, those circumcised by surgeons had 2.1-fold higher penile problems in the year after circumcision (95% CI [2-2.3], p < 0.001). Procedure-related complications within 28 days of circumcision were infrequent (0.5%), with the most common being penile edema (0.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Penile problems are very infrequent in boys in the first five years of life. However, when they occur, they are 3x more likely to occur in circumcised boys relative to uncircumcised boys. Penile problems are more likely to occur in boys circumcised by surgeons.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognosis study.

摘要

目的

比较包皮环切术与未行包皮环切术男孩的阴茎问题,并确定实施环切术的医生中术后出现问题的比例更低。

方法

使用 2011 年至 2020 年 MarketScan 数据库中的 CPT 代码识别行包皮环切术的男孩。选择年龄、居住地和保险类型相同的未行包皮环切术的对照组。主要结局是阴茎问题,定义为阴茎特定的感染、炎症和尿道狭窄/梗阻等。次要结局是术后 28 天内与手术相关的并发症,以及行环切术的医生是否会导致术后问题存在差异。使用 ICD-9/10 诊断代码识别这些问题。

结果

我们共确定了约 85 万例病例和 85 万例匹配的对照组。总体而言,在生命的头五年内,行包皮环切术的男孩中阴茎问题的发生率为 1.7%,而未行包皮环切术的男孩中为 0.5%(p<0.05)。多变量回归模型显示,与未行包皮环切术的男性相比,包皮环切术男性的阴茎问题风险高 2.9 倍(95%CI [2.8-3],p<0.001)。与由儿科医生行包皮环切术的男性相比,由外科医生行包皮环切术的男性在术后第一年阴茎问题发生率高 2.1 倍(95%CI [2-2.3],p<0.001)。术后 28 天内的与手术相关的并发症很少见(0.5%),最常见的是阴茎水肿(0.2%)。

结论

在生命的头五年内,男孩中阴茎问题非常少见。然而,当发生时,与未行包皮环切术的男孩相比,行包皮环切术的男孩发生阴茎问题的可能性要高出 3 倍。由外科医生行包皮环切术的男孩更容易发生阴茎问题。

证据水平

二级。

研究类型

预后研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55b1/11486584/062992af72eb/nihms-2014458-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55b1/11486584/062992af72eb/nihms-2014458-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55b1/11486584/062992af72eb/nihms-2014458-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing Penile Problems in Circumcised vs. Uncircumcised Boys: Insights From a Large Commercial Claims Database With a Focus on Provider Type Performing Circumcision.比较包茎与非包茎男孩的阴茎问题:基于大型商业理赔数据库的分析,重点关注施行包皮环切术的医生类型
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Nov;59(11):161614. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.06.022. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
2
Neonatal circumcision.新生儿包皮环切术
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 Dec;48(6):1539-57. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70390-4.
3
Cohort study on circumcision of newborn boys and subsequent risk of urinary-tract infection.新生儿男孩包皮环切术及后续尿路感染风险的队列研究。
Lancet. 1998 Dec 5;352(9143):1813-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02392-7.
4
Neonatal circumcision and penile problems: an 8-year longitudinal study.新生儿包皮环切术与阴茎问题:一项为期8年的纵向研究。
Pediatrics. 1988 Apr;81(4):537-41.
5
The frequency of foreskin problems in uncircumcised children.未行包皮环切术儿童包皮问题的发生率。
Am J Dis Child. 1986 Mar;140(3):254-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1986.02140170080036.
6
Rates of adverse events associated with male circumcision in U.S. medical settings, 2001 to 2010.2001年至2010年美国医疗机构中与男性包皮环切术相关的不良事件发生率。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Jul;168(7):625-34. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5414.
7
The relationship between obesity and complications after neonatal circumcision.肥胖与新生儿包皮环切术后并发症的关系。
J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4 Suppl):1638-41. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.016.
8
Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys.出生后第一个月进行包皮环切术的风险与未进行包皮环切术的男孩的风险比较。
Pediatrics. 1989 Jun;83(6):1011-5.
9
Variability in penile appearance and penile findings: a prospective study.阴茎外观及阴茎检查结果的变异性:一项前瞻性研究。
Br J Urol. 1997 Nov;80(5):776-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00467.x.
10
Male circumcision.男性割礼。
Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):e756-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1990. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Neonatal circumcision availability in the United States: a physician survey.美国新生儿割礼的可及性:一项医师调查。
BMC Urol. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00911-7.
2
Male Circumcision Complications - A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.男性割礼并发症 - 系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Urology. 2021 Jun;152:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.041. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
3
A contemporary snapshot of circumcision in US children's hospitals.美国儿童医院割礼现状。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Jun;55(6):1134-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.02.031. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
4
Penile Inflammatory Skin Disorders and the Preventive Role of Circumcision.阴茎炎性皮肤病与包皮环切术的预防作用
Int J Prev Med. 2017 May 4;8:32. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_377_16. eCollection 2017.
5
Early infant male circumcision: Systematic review, risk-benefit analysis, and progress in policy.早期男婴包皮环切术:系统评价、风险效益分析及政策进展
World J Clin Pediatr. 2017 Feb 8;6(1):89-102. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v6.i1.89.
6
Circumcision of male infants and children as a public health measure in developed countries: A critical assessment of recent evidence.发达国家男性婴儿和儿童割礼作为公共卫生措施:对最新证据的批判性评估。
Glob Public Health. 2018 May;13(5):626-641. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2016.1184292. Epub 2016 May 19.
7
Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision.特定国家和全球男性包皮环切术流行率的估计。
Popul Health Metr. 2016 Mar 1;14:4. doi: 10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5. eCollection 2016.
8
Newborn male circumcision.新生儿男性包皮环切术。
Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Aug-Sep;20(6):311-20. doi: 10.1093/pch/20.6.311.
9
Circumcision of privately insured males aged 0 to 18 years in the United States.美国0至18岁参加私人保险男性的包皮环切术。
Pediatrics. 2014 Nov;134(5):950-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1007. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
10
Rates of adverse events associated with male circumcision in U.S. medical settings, 2001 to 2010.2001年至2010年美国医疗机构中与男性包皮环切术相关的不良事件发生率。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Jul;168(7):625-34. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5414.