• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用判别特征和类别平衡技术提高深度学习模型预测和分类伽马通过率的性能:一项回顾性队列研究。

Improving the performance of deep learning models in predicting and classifying gamma passing rates with discriminative features and a class balancing technique: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Song Wei, Shang Wen, Li Chunying, Bian Xinyu, Lu Hong, Ma Jun, Yu Dahai

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210029, China.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jul 31;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02496-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13014-024-02496-5
PMID:39085872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11293183/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to improve the deep learning (DL) model performance in predicting and classifying IMRT gamma passing rate (GPR) by using input features related to machine parameters and a class balancing technique.

METHODS

A total of 2348 fields from 204 IMRT plans for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively collected to form a dataset. Input feature maps, including fluence, leaf gap, leaf speed of both banks, and corresponding errors, were constructed from the dynamic log files. The SHAP framework was employed to compute the impact of each feature on the model output for recursive feature elimination. A series of UNet++ based models were trained on the obtained eight feature sets with three fine-tuning methods including the standard mean squared error (MSE) loss, a re-sampling technique, and a proposed weighted MSE loss (WMSE). Differences in mean absolute error, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were compared between the different models.

RESULTS

The models trained with feature sets including leaf speed and leaf gap features predicted GPR for failed fields more accurately than the other models (F(7, 147) = 5.378, p < 0.001). The WMSE loss had the highest accuracy in predicting GPR for failed fields among the three fine-tuning methods (F(2, 42) = 14.149, p < 0.001), while an opposite trend was observed in predicting GPR for passed fields (F(2, 730) = 9.907, p < 0.001). The WMSE_FS5 model achieved a superior AUC (0.92) and more balanced sensitivity (0.77) and specificity (0.89) compared to the other models.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine parameters can provide discriminative input features for GPR prediction in DL. The novel weighted loss function demonstrates the ability to balance the prediction and classification accuracy between the passed and failed fields. The proposed approach is able to improve the DL model performance in predicting and classifying GPR, and can potentially be integrated into the plan optimization process to generate higher deliverability plans.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This clinical trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on March 26th, 2020 (registration number: ChiCTR2000031276). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ChiCTR2000031276.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是通过使用与机器参数相关的输入特征和类平衡技术,提高深度学习(DL)模型在预测和分类调强放疗伽马通过率(GPR)方面的性能。

方法

回顾性收集了204例鼻咽癌患者调强放疗计划中的2348个射野,以形成一个数据集。根据动态日志文件构建输入特征图,包括注量、叶间距、双侧叶片速度及其相应误差。采用SHAP框架计算每个特征对模型输出的影响,以进行递归特征消除。基于一系列UNet++的模型在获得的八个特征集上进行训练,采用三种微调方法,包括标准均方误差(MSE)损失、重采样技术和提出的加权MSE损失(WMSE)。比较不同模型在平均绝对误差、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度和特异性方面的差异。

结果

使用包括叶片速度和叶间距特征的特征集训练的模型,在预测失败射野的GPR方面比其他模型更准确(F(7, 147) = 5.378,p < 0.001)。在三种微调方法中,WMSE损失在预测失败射野的GPR方面具有最高的准确率(F(2, 42) = 14.149,p < 0.001),而在预测通过射野的GPR方面观察到相反的趋势(F(2, 730) = 9.907,p < 0.001)。与其他模型相比,WMSE_FS5模型实现了更高的AUC(0.92)以及更平衡的灵敏度(0.77)和特异性(0.89)。

结论

机器参数可为DL中GPR的预测提供有区分性的输入特征。新型加权损失函数显示出能够平衡通过和失败射野之间的预测和分类准确率。所提出的方法能够提高DL模型在预测和分类GPR方面的性能,并有可能集成到计划优化过程中以生成更高可交付性的计划。

试验注册

本临床试验于2020年3月26日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:ChiCTR2000031276)。https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ChiCTR2000031276。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/ef7ab0026f17/13014_2024_2496_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/7847394d5a88/13014_2024_2496_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/3d45d8089ca9/13014_2024_2496_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/ce75be521d5b/13014_2024_2496_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/384f42e0a1e0/13014_2024_2496_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/e7dc82a4bdd3/13014_2024_2496_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/ef7ab0026f17/13014_2024_2496_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/7847394d5a88/13014_2024_2496_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/3d45d8089ca9/13014_2024_2496_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/ce75be521d5b/13014_2024_2496_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/384f42e0a1e0/13014_2024_2496_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/e7dc82a4bdd3/13014_2024_2496_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c2/11293183/ef7ab0026f17/13014_2024_2496_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving the performance of deep learning models in predicting and classifying gamma passing rates with discriminative features and a class balancing technique: a retrospective cohort study.利用判别特征和类别平衡技术提高深度学习模型预测和分类伽马通过率的性能:一项回顾性队列研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jul 31;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02496-5.
2
Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files.基于日志文件提供的投递剂量信息的深度学习:预测调强放疗的伽马通过率。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338221104881. doi: 10.1177/15330338221104881.
3
Automatic IMRT treatment planning through fluence prediction and plan fine-tuning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.通过剂量预测和计划微调实现鼻咽癌的自动调强治疗计划。
Radiat Oncol. 2024 Mar 20;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02401-0.
4
Unbiased evaluation of predicted gamma passing rate by an event-mixing technique.采用事件混合技术对预测伽马通过率的无偏评估。
Med Phys. 2024 Jan;51(1):5-17. doi: 10.1002/mp.16848. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
5
A feasibility study to predict 3D dose delivery accuracy for IMRT using DenseNet with log files.基于日志文件使用 DenseNet 预测 IMRT 三维剂量投递精度的可行性研究
J Xray Sci Technol. 2024;32(4):1199-1208. doi: 10.3233/XST-230412.
6
Virtual pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy using deep learning.使用深度学习进行容积调强弧形治疗的虚拟预处理患者特异性质量保证。
Med Phys. 2023 Dec;50(12):7891-7903. doi: 10.1002/mp.16567. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
7
Pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance prediction based on 1D complexity metrics and 3D planning dose: classification, gamma passing rates, and DVH metrics.基于 1D 复杂度指标和 3D 计划剂量的预处理患者特异性质量保证预测:分类、伽马通过率和剂量体积直方图指标。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Nov 20;18(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02376-4.
8
Prediction of the individual multileaf collimator positional deviations during dynamic IMRT delivery priori with artificial neural network.运用人工神经网络预测动态调强放射治疗过程中多叶准直器的个体位置偏差。
Med Phys. 2020 Apr;47(4):1421-1430. doi: 10.1002/mp.14014. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy.在射野剂量分布图上进行纹理分析,以评估容积调强弧形放疗的调制度。
Med Phys. 2014 Nov;41(11):111718. doi: 10.1118/1.4897388.
10
Evaluation of prediction and classification performances in different machine learning models for patient-specific quality assurance of head-and-neck VMAT plans.不同机器学习模型对头颈部 VMAT 计划个体化质量保证预测和分类性能的评估。
Med Phys. 2022 Jan;49(1):727-741. doi: 10.1002/mp.15393. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Overcoming class imbalance in drug discovery problems: Graph neural networks and balancing approaches.克服药物发现问题中的类别不平衡:图神经网络和平衡方法。
J Mol Graph Model. 2024 Jan;126:108627. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2023.108627. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
2
Explainable SHAP-XGBoost models for in-hospital mortality after myocardial infarction.用于心肌梗死后院内死亡率的可解释性SHAP-XGBoost模型。
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2023 Jun 14;4(4):126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.06.001. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Class-imbalanced complementary-label learning via weighted loss.
基于加权损失的类别不平衡互补标签学习。
Neural Netw. 2023 Sep;166:555-565. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2023.07.030. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
4
A Class-Imbalance Aware and Explainable Spatio-Temporal Graph Attention Network for Neonatal Seizure Detection.一种基于类不平衡感知和可解释的时空图注意力网络的新生儿癫痫检测方法。
Int J Neural Syst. 2023 Sep;33(9):2350046. doi: 10.1142/S0129065723500466. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
5
XGBoost-SHAP-based interpretable diagnostic framework for alzheimer's disease.基于 XGBoost-SHAP 的阿尔茨海默病可解释诊断框架。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jul 25;23(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02238-9.
6
CoT-UNet++: A medical image segmentation method based on contextual transformer and dense connection.CoT-UNet++:一种基于上下文Transformer 和密集连接的医学图像分割方法。
Math Biosci Eng. 2023 Mar 1;20(5):8320-8336. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023364.
7
IMRT QA result prediction via MLC transmission decomposition.通过叶片传输分解预测调强放疗 QA 结果。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Aug;24(8):e13990. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13990. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
8
VISAL-A novel learning strategy to address class imbalance.VISAL——一种解决类别不平衡问题的新型学习策略。
Neural Netw. 2023 Apr;161:178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2023.01.015. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
9
Comparing log file to measurement-based patient-specific quality assurance.将日志文件与基于测量的患者特定质量保证进行比较。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Mar;46(1):303-311. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01219-6. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
10
A Comparison of Techniques for Class Imbalance in Deep Learning Classification of Breast Cancer.深度学习乳腺癌分类中类别不平衡技术的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 26;13(1):67. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010067.