Suppr超能文献

胃食管反流病诊断中夜间平均基线阻抗:我们是否应严格遵循里昂第二共识?

Mean nocturnal baseline impedance in gastro-esophageal reflux disease diagnosis: Should we strictly follow the Lyon 2 Consensus?

作者信息

Voulgaris Theodoros A, Karamanolis Georgios P

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 14;30(26):3253-3256. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i26.3253.

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines drive clinical practice and clinicians rely to them when trying to answer their most common questions. One of the most important position papers in the field of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the one produced by the Lyon Consensus. Recently an updated second version has been released. Mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) was proposed by the first Consensus to act as supportive evidence for GERD diagnosis. Originally a cut-off of 2292 Ohms was proposed, a value revised in the second edition. The updated Consensus recommended that an MNBI < 1500 Ohms strongly suggests GERD while a value > 2500 Ohms can be used to refute GERD. The proposed cut-offs move in the correct direction by diminishing the original cut-off, nevertheless they arise from a study of normal subjects where cut-offs were provided by measuring the mean value ± 2SD and not in symptomatic patients. However, data exist that even symptomatic patients with inconclusive disease or reflux hypersensitivity (RH) show lower MNBI values in comparison to normal subjects or patients with functional heartburn (FH). Moreover, according to the data, MNBI, even among symptomatic patients, is affected by age and body mass index. Also, various studies have proposed different cut-offs by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis even lower than the one proposed. Finally, no information is given for patients submitted to on-proton pump inhibitors pH-impedance studies even if new and extremely important data now exist. Therefore, even if MNBI is an extremely important tool when trying to approach patients with reflux symptoms and could distinguish conclusive GERD from RH or FH, its values should be interpreted with caution.

摘要

临床实践指南推动临床实践,临床医生在试图回答最常见问题时会依赖这些指南。胃食管反流病(GERD)领域最重要的立场文件之一是里昂共识发布的文件。最近发布了更新的第二版。第一版共识提出平均夜间基线阻抗(MNBI)作为GERD诊断的支持证据。最初提出的截断值为2292欧姆,该值在第二版中有所修订。更新后的共识建议,MNBI < 1500欧姆强烈提示GERD,而> 2500欧姆的值可用于排除GERD。通过降低原始截断值,建议的截断值朝着正确的方向发展,然而它们来自对正常受试者的研究,其中截断值是通过测量平均值±2SD提供的,而不是在有症状的患者中。然而,有数据表明,即使是患有不确定性疾病或反流高敏(RH)的有症状患者,与正常受试者或功能性烧心(FH)患者相比,MNBI值也较低。此外,根据数据,即使在有症状的患者中,MNBI也受年龄和体重指数的影响。而且,各种研究通过使用受试者工作特征曲线分析提出了不同的截断值,甚至低于所提出的截断值。最后,对于接受质子泵抑制剂pH阻抗研究的患者没有给出任何信息,即使现在有新的且极其重要的数据。因此,即使MNBI在处理有反流症状的患者时是一个极其重要的工具,并且可以将确定性GERD与RH或FH区分开来,其值也应谨慎解释。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Improved diagnosis of reflux hypersensitivity.反流过敏的诊断得到改善。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Dec;35(12):e14680. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14680. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
9
Untangling Nonerosive Reflux Disease From Functional Heartburn.从功能性烧心症中理清非糜烂性反流病。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;19(7):1314-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.057. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
10
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Functional Heartburn: Expert Review.AGA 临床实践更新:功能性烧心症专家评论
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jun;158(8):2286-2293. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.034. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验