Digestive Pathophysiology Unit and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy.
Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 May;35(5):e14547. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14547. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
On-therapy impedance-pH monitoring is recommended in patients with documented GERD and PPI-refractory heartburn in order to establish whether the unremitting symptom is reflux-related or not.
To define on-PPI cut-offs of impedance-pH metrics allowing proper interpretation of on-therapy impedance-pH monitoring.
Blinded expert review of impedance-pH tracings performed during double-dosage PPI, prospectively collected from 150 GERD patients with PPI-refractory heartburn and 45 GERD patients with PPI-responsive heartburn but persisting extra-esophageal symptoms. Acid exposure time (AET), number of total refluxes (TRs), post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index, and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) were assessed. On-PPI cut-offs were defined and evaluated with ROC analysis and the area under curve (AUC).
All the four impedance-pH metrics significantly differed between PPI-refractory and PPI-responsive heartburn cases. At ROC analysis, AUC was 0.73 for AET, 0.75 for TRs, 0.81 for PSPW index, and 0.71 for MNBI; best cut-offs were ≥1.7% for AET, ≥45 for TRs, ≤36% for PSPW index, and ≤ 1847 Ω for MNBI; AUC of such cut-offs was 0.66, 0.71, 0.73, and 0.68, respectively. Analysis of PSPW index and MNBI added to assessment of AET and TRs significantly increased the yield of on-therapy impedance-pH monitoring in the PPI-refractory cohort (97% vs. 83%, p < 0.0001). Notably, suboptimal acid suppression as shown by AET ≥1.7% was detected in 43% of 150 PPI-refractory cases.
We have defined on-PPI cut-offs of impedance-pH metrics by which comprehensive assessment of impedance-pH tracings, including analysis of PSPW index and MNBI can efficiently characterize PPI-refractory GERD and support treatment escalation.
对于有 GERD 病史且质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗后烧心仍未缓解的患者,建议进行治疗中的阻抗-pH 监测,以确定持续存在的症状是否与反流有关。
确定阻抗-pH 监测中 PPI 抑制后阻抗-pH 指标的截断值,以正确解读治疗中的阻抗-pH 监测结果。
对 150 例 PPI 治疗后烧心未缓解的 GERD 患者和 45 例 PPI 治疗后烧心缓解但仍存在食管外症状的 GERD 患者前瞻性收集的双剂量 PPI 治疗期间的阻抗-pH 描记图进行盲法专家审查。评估酸暴露时间(AET)、总反流次数(TRs)、反流后吞咽引发的蠕动波(PSPW)指数和夜间基础阻抗(MNBI)。通过 ROC 分析和曲线下面积(AUC)评估 PPI 抑制后截断值,并进行评价。
PPI 治疗后烧心未缓解和缓解的患者之间,所有 4 项阻抗-pH 指标均有显著差异。ROC 分析显示,AET、TRs、PSPW 指数和 MNBI 的 AUC 分别为 0.73、0.75、0.81 和 0.71;最佳截断值分别为 AET≥1.7%、TRs≥45、PSPW 指数≤36%和 MNBI≤1847Ω;这些截断值的 AUC 分别为 0.66、0.71、0.73 和 0.68。分析 PSPW 指数和 MNBI 并结合 AET 和 TRs 的评估,显著提高了 PPI 治疗后烧心未缓解患者的阻抗-pH 监测的检出率(97% vs. 83%,p<0.0001)。值得注意的是,在 150 例 PPI 治疗后烧心未缓解的患者中,有 43%的患者表现为 AET≥1.7%,提示酸抑制不足。
我们通过 PPI 抑制后阻抗-pH 指标定义了截断值,通过全面评估阻抗-pH 描记图,包括 PSPW 指数和 MNBI 的分析,可有效评估 PPI 治疗后烧心未缓解的 GERD 患者,并支持治疗方案升级。