Rk Karpagam, Ramakrishnan Karthik Krishna, Gunasekaran Dhivya, Aram Arun, Natarajan Paarthipan
Department of Radiology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 1;16(7):e63591. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63591. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Introduction Preeclampsia is a serious complication marked by antepartum hemorrhage, resulting in severe maternal and fetal complications. Predicting this condition using placental dysfunction assessments, such as uterine artery Doppler ultrasound, is challenging due to the placenta's evolving structural and biochemical characteristics throughout different stages of pregnancy. Objectives To determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the uterine artery Doppler Pulsatility Index (PI) and Resistive Index (RI) in predicting preeclampsia. To compare the Doppler ultrasound measurements between normal pregnancies and those that develop preeclampsia. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in predicting gestational hypertension in addition to preeclampsia. Methodology Conducted as a prospective study, 116 antenatal mothers with computed gestational ages and scan gestational ages between 11 and 14 weeks, and a previous history of preeclampsia were included. Subjects with chronic hypertension or multiple gestations were excluded. Participants underwent uterine artery Doppler screening, during which the PI and RI were measured upon obtaining three consecutive similar waveforms, and the mean PI of the left and right arteries was calculated. The outcomes of patients with normal pregnancies and those who developed preeclampsia were compared. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results The mean PI among participants was 1.75 (±0.38), with a range from 1 to 2.75. The mean RI was 0.58 (±0.08), ranging from 0.45 to 0.8. The cutoff for the mean PI in predicting preeclampsia was 2.27, which showed a sensitivity of 92.9%, specificity of 97.1%, PPV of 81.47%, NPV of 99.01%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 96.59% (area under the curve (AUC): 0.982). The cutoff for the mean RI for predicting preeclampsia was 0.695, with a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 98%, PPV of 85.47%, NPV of 98.04%, and diagnostic accuracy of 96.52% (AUC: 0.965). In predicting gestational hypertension, the cutoff for the mean PI was 1.975, with a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 82.9%, PPV of 17.41%, NPV of 98.92%, and diagnostic accuracy of 82.78% (AUC: 0.848). The cutoff for the mean RI in predicting gestational hypertension was 0.615, showing a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 80.2%, PPV of 15.4%, NPV of 98.89%, and diagnostic accuracy of 80.19% (AUC: 0.767). Conclusion The research demonstrated that aberrant readings in uterine Doppler ultrasound, specifically in the PI and RI, possess strong overall validity in forecasting the occurrence of preeclampsia.
引言
子痫前期是一种以产前出血为特征的严重并发症,会导致严重的母婴并发症。由于胎盘在妊娠不同阶段的结构和生化特性不断变化,使用胎盘功能障碍评估方法(如子宫动脉多普勒超声)来预测这种情况具有挑战性。
目的
确定子宫动脉多普勒搏动指数(PI)和阻力指数(RI)在预测子痫前期时的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。比较正常妊娠与发生子痫前期的妊娠之间的多普勒超声测量结果。评估子宫动脉多普勒超声在预测子痫前期之外的妊娠期高血压方面的诊断准确性。
方法
作为一项前瞻性研究,纳入了116名计算孕周和超声扫描孕周在11至14周之间且有子痫前期病史的产前母亲。排除患有慢性高血压或多胎妊娠的受试者。参与者接受子宫动脉多普勒筛查,在获得三个连续相似波形时测量PI和RI,并计算左右动脉的平均PI。比较正常妊娠患者和发生子痫前期患者的结局。数据录入Microsoft Excel(美国华盛顿州雷德蒙德市微软公司),并使用IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 23版(2015年发布;美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)进行分析。
结果
参与者的平均PI为1.75(±0.38),范围为1至2.75。平均RI为0.58(±0.08),范围为0.45至0.8。预测子痫前期的平均PI临界值为2.27,敏感性为92.9%,特异性为97.1%,PPV为81.47%,NPV为99.01%,诊断准确性为96.59%(曲线下面积(AUC):0.982)。预测子痫前期的平均RI临界值为0.695,敏感性为85.7%,特异性为98%,PPV为85.47%,NPV为98.04%,诊断准确性为96.52%(AUC:0.965)。在预测妊娠期高血压时,平均PI临界值为1.975,敏感性为80%,特异性为82.9%,PPV为17.41%,NPV为98.92%,诊断准确性为82.78%(AUC:0.848)。预测妊娠期高血压的平均RI临界值为0.615,敏感性为80%,特异性为80.2%,PPV为15.4%,NPV为98.89%,诊断准确性为80.19%(AUC:0.767)。
结论
该研究表明,子宫多普勒超声的异常读数,特别是PI和RI,在预测子痫前期的发生方面具有很强的总体有效性。