Suppr超能文献

基于 3D 动态对比增强 MRI 的黄金角度放射状稀疏并行(GRASP)与常规笛卡尔采样方法在膀胱癌中的比较:一项初步研究。

Comparison of golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) and conventional cartesian sampling in 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced mri for bladder cancer: a preliminary study.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.

Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 7577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Dec;42(12):1469-1478. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01637-w. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality, inter-reader agreement, and diagnostic capability for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) of the reconstructed images in sections orthogonal to the bladder tumor obtained by 3D Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI using the Golden-angle Radial Sparse Parallel (GRASP) technique with the images directly captured using the Cartesian sampling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study involved 68 initial cases of bladder cancer examined with DCE-MRI (GRASP: n = 34, Cartesian: n = 34) at 3 Tesla. Four radiologists conducted qualitative evaluations (overall image quality, absence of motion artifact, absence of streak artifact, and tumor conspicuity) using a five-point Likert scale (5 = Excellent/None) and quantitative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) DCE score for MIBC assessment were calculated. Inter-reader agreement was also assessed.

RESULTS

GRASP notably enhanced overall image quality (pooled score: GRASP 4 vs. Cartesian 3, P < 0.0001), tumor conspicuity (5 vs. 3, P < 0.05), SNR (Median 38.2 vs. 19.0, P < 0.0001), and CNR (7.9 vs. 6.0, P = 0.005), with fewer motion artifacts (5 vs. 3, P < 0.0001) and minor streak artifacts (5 vs. 5, P > 0.05). Although no significant differences were observed, the GRASP group tended to have higher AUCs for MIBC (pooled AUCs: 0.92 vs. 0.88) and showed a trend toward higher inter-reader agreement (pooled kappa-value: 0.70 vs. 0.63) compared to the Cartesian group.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the GRASP for 3D DCE-MRI, the reconstructed images in sections orthogonal to the bladder tumor achieved higher image quality and improve the clinical work flow, compared to the images directly captured using the Cartesian. GRASP tended to have higher diagnostic ability for MIBC and showed a trend toward higher inter-reader agreement compared to the Cartesian.

摘要

目的

比较三维动态对比增强(DCE)MRI 中使用 Golden-angle Radial Sparse Parallel(GRASP)技术重建与直接使用笛卡尔采集的与膀胱肿瘤正交的节段图像的图像质量、读者间一致性和对肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的诊断能力。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了 68 例在 3.0T 磁共振扫描仪上接受 DCE-MRI 检查的膀胱癌初始病例(GRASP:n=34,笛卡尔:n=34)。4 位放射科医生使用 5 分制(5=极好/无)进行定性评估(整体图像质量、无运动伪影、无条纹伪影和肿瘤显著性)和定量信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)测量。计算 Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System(VI-RADS)DCE 评分评估 MIBC 的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积。还评估了读者间的一致性。

结果

GRASP 显著提高了整体图像质量(综合评分:GRASP 4 与笛卡尔 3,P<0.0001)、肿瘤显著性(5 与 3,P<0.05)、SNR(中位数 38.2 与 19.0,P<0.0001)和 CNR(7.9 与 6.0,P=0.005),运动伪影更少(5 与 3,P<0.0001),条纹伪影更小(5 与 5,P>0.05)。虽然没有观察到显著差异,但与笛卡尔组相比,GRASP 组的 MIBC 更高(综合 AUCs:0.92 与 0.88),读者间的一致性更高(综合 Kappa 值:0.70 与 0.63)。

结论

与直接使用笛卡尔采集相比,使用 3D DCE-MRI 的 GRASP 技术重建与膀胱肿瘤正交的节段图像,可获得更高的图像质量并改善临床工作流程。与笛卡尔相比,GRASP 对 MIBC 的诊断能力更高,且读者间的一致性更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/11588826/c7165cc8fe84/11604_2024_1637_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验