Suppr超能文献

膀胱癌:MRI评估肌肉浸润是否需要注射造影剂?一项前瞻性多阅片者VI-RADS研究方法

Bladder cancer: do we need contrast injection for MRI assessment of muscle invasion? A prospective multi-reader VI-RADS approach.

作者信息

Delli Pizzi Andrea, Mastrodicasa Domenico, Marchioni Michele, Primiceri Giulia, Di Fabio Francesca, Cianci Roberta, Seccia Barbara, Sessa Barbara, Mincuzzi Erica, Romanelli Martina, Castellan Pietro, Castellucci Roberto, Colasante Antonella, Schips Luigi, Basilico Raffaella, Caulo Massimo

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Via Luigi Polacchi 11, 66100, Chieti, Italy.

ITAB - Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 Jun;31(6):3874-3883. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07473-6. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) To investigate whether a contrast-free biparametric MRI (bp-MRI) including T2-weighted images (T2W) and diffusion-weighted images (DWI) can be considered an accurate alternative to the standard multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI), consisting of T2, DWI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging for the muscle-invasiveness assessment of bladder cancer (BC), and (2) to evaluate how the diagnostic performance of differently experienced readers is affected according to the type of MRI protocol.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients who underwent a clinically indicated bladder mp-MRI on a 3-T scanner were prospectively enrolled. Trans-urethral resection of bladder was the gold standard. Two sets of images, set 1 (bp-MRI) and set 2 (mp-MRI), were independently reviewed by four readers. Descriptive statistics, including sensitivity and specificity, were calculated for each reader. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated for the bp-MRI and the standard mp-MRI. Pairwise comparison of the ROC curves was performed.

RESULTS

The AUCs for bp- and mp-MRI were respectively 0.91-0.92 (reader 1), 0.90 (reader 2), 0.95-0.90 (reader 3), and 0.90-0.87 (reader 4). Sensitivity was 100% for both protocols and specificity ranged between 79.31 and 89.66% and between 79.31 and 83.33% for bp-MRI and mp-MRI, respectively. No significant differences were shown between the two MRI protocols (p > 0.05). No significant differences were shown accordingly to the reader's experience (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A bp-MRI protocol consisting of T2W and DWI has comparable diagnostic accuracy to the standard mp-MRI protocol for the detection of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The experience of the reader does not significantly affect the diagnostic performance using VI-RADS.

KEY POINTS

• The contrast-free MRI protocol shows a comparable accuracy to the standard multiparametric MRI protocol in the bladder cancer muscle-invasiveness assessment. • VI-RADS classification helps non-expert radiologists to assess the muscle-invasiveness of bladder cancer. • DCE should be carefully interpreted by less experienced readers due to inflammatory changes representing a potential pitfall.

摘要

目的

(1)研究包括T2加权成像(T2W)和扩散加权成像(DWI)的无对比剂双参数磁共振成像(bp-MRI)是否可被视为标准多参数磁共振成像(mp-MRI,由T2、DWI和动态对比增强(DCE)成像组成)用于膀胱癌(BC)肌肉浸润性评估的准确替代方法;(2)评估不同经验的阅片者的诊断性能如何根据MRI方案类型受到影响。

方法

前瞻性纳入38例在3-T扫描仪上接受临床指征性膀胱mp-MRI检查的患者。经尿道膀胱切除术为金标准。两组图像,即第1组(bp-MRI)和第2组(mp-MRI),由四名阅片者独立进行评估。计算每位阅片者的描述性统计数据,包括敏感性和特异性。进行受试者操作特征(ROC)分析,并计算bp-MRI和标准mp-MRI的曲线下面积(AUC)。对ROC曲线进行两两比较。

结果

bp-MRI和mp-MRI的AUC分别为0.91 - 0.92(阅片者1)、0.90(阅片者2)、0.95 - 0.90(阅片者3)和0.90 - 0.87(阅片者4)。两种方案的敏感性均为100%,bp-MRI的特异性在79.31%至89.66%之间,mp-MRI的特异性在79.31%至83.33%之间。两种MRI方案之间未显示出显著差异(p>0.05)。根据阅片者的经验也未显示出显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

由T2W和DWI组成的bp-MRI方案在检测肌肉浸润性膀胱癌方面具有与标准mp-MRI方案相当的诊断准确性。阅片者的经验对使用VI-RADS的诊断性能没有显著影响。

关键点

• 在膀胱癌肌肉浸润性评估中,无对比剂MRI方案显示出与标准多参数MRI方案相当的准确性。• VI-RADS分类有助于非专业放射科医生评估膀胱癌的肌肉浸润性。• 由于炎症改变可能是一个潜在陷阱,经验较少的阅片者对DCE的解读应谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570a/8128729/a2b002bd60dc/330_2020_7473_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验