Lenert Leslie, Rheingold Alyssa A, Simpson Kit N, Scherbakov Dmitry, Aiken Michael, Hahn Christine, McCauley Jenna L, Ennis Naomi, Diaz Vanessa A
Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425070. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25070.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health issue, with a 25% lifetime prevalence. Screening for IPV in primary care is a recommended practice whose effectiveness is debated.
To assess the effect of an electronic health record (EHR)-based multifactorial intervention screening on the detection of IPV risk in primary care practice.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cluster randomized clinical trial used a stepped-wedge design to assign 15 family medicine primary care clinics in the Medical University of South Carolina Health System in the Charleston region to 3 matched blocks from October 6, 2020, to March 31, 2023. All women aged 18 to 49 years who were seen in these clinics participated in this study.
A noninterruptive EHR alert combined with confidential screening by computer questionnaire using the EHR platform followed by risk assessment and a decision support template.
The main outcomes were the rate at which patients were screened for IPV across the clinics and the rate at which patients at risk for IPV were detected by screening procedures.
The study clinics cared for 8895 unique patients (mean [SD] age, 34.6 [8.7] years; 1270 [14.3%] with Medicaid or Medicare and 7625 [85.7%] with private, military, or other insurance) over the study period eligible for the screening intervention. The intervention had significant effects on the overall rate of screening for IPV, increasing the rate of screening from 45.2% (10 268 of 22 730 patient visits) to 65.3% (22 303 of 34 157 patient visits) when the noninterruptive alert was active (relative risk, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.44-1.49]; P < .001). The confidential screening process was more effective than baseline nurse-led oral screening at identifying patients reporting past-year IPV (130 of 8895 patients [1.5%] vs 9 of 17 433 patients [0.1%]).
The intervention was largely effective in increasing screening adherence and the positive detection rate of IPV in primary care. A highly private approach to screening for IPV in primary care may be necessary to achieve adequate detection rates while addressing potential safety issues of patients experiencing IPV.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06284148.
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,终生患病率为25%。在初级保健中筛查IPV是一项推荐做法,但其有效性存在争议。
评估基于电子健康记录(EHR)的多因素干预筛查对初级保健实践中IPV风险检测的影响。
设计、设置和参与者:这项整群随机临床试验采用阶梯楔形设计,于2020年10月6日至2023年3月31日将查尔斯顿地区南卡罗来纳医科大学卫生系统的15家家庭医学初级保健诊所分配到3个匹配组。在这些诊所就诊的所有18至49岁女性都参与了本研究。
一种非干扰性的电子健康记录警报,结合使用电子健康记录平台通过计算机问卷进行的保密筛查,随后进行风险评估和决策支持模板。
主要结局是各诊所对IPV进行筛查的患者比例以及通过筛查程序检测出有IPV风险的患者比例。
在研究期间,研究诊所共诊治了8895名独特患者(平均[标准差]年龄为34.6[8.7]岁;1270名[14.3%]有医疗补助或医疗保险,7625名[85.7%]有私人、军人或其他保险),符合筛查干预条件。该干预措施对IPV的总体筛查率有显著影响,当非干扰性警报启动时,筛查率从45.2%(22730次就诊中有10268次)提高到65.3%(34157次就诊中有22303次)(相对风险,1.46[95%CI,1.44 - 1.49];P < 0.001)。保密筛查过程在识别报告过去一年有IPV的患者方面比基线时护士主导的口头筛查更有效(8895名患者中有130名[1.5%],而17433名患者中有9名[0.1%])。
该干预措施在提高初级保健中对IPV的筛查依从性和阳性检测率方面基本有效。在初级保健中采用高度私密的IPV筛查方法可能是必要的,以实现足够的检测率,同时解决遭受IPV患者的潜在安全问题。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06284148。