• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低收入和中低收入国家实施开源电子健康记录系统的背景障碍:范围审查

Contextual Barriers to Implementing Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems for Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review.

作者信息

Bostan Sarah, Johnson Owen A, Jaspersen Lena J, Randell Rebecca

机构信息

Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 1;26:e45242. doi: 10.2196/45242.

DOI:10.2196/45242
PMID:39088815
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11327637/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low- and lower-middle-income countries account for a higher percentage of global epidemics and chronic diseases. In most low- and lower-middle-income countries, there is limited access to health care. The implementation of open-source electronic health records (EHRs) can be understood as a powerful enabler for low- and lower-middle-income countries because it can transform the way health care technology is delivered. Open-source EHRs can enhance health care delivery in low- and lower-middle-income countries by improving the collection, management, and analysis of health data needed to inform health care delivery, policy, and planning. While open-source EHR systems are cost-effective and adaptable, they have not proliferated rapidly in low- and lower-middle-income countries. Implementation barriers slow adoption, with existing research focusing predominantly on technical issues preventing successful implementation.

OBJECTIVE

This interdisciplinary scoping review aims to provide an overview of contextual barriers affecting the adaptation and implementation of open-source EHR systems in low- and lower-middle-income countries and to identify areas for future research.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping literature review following a systematic methodological framework. A total of 7 databases were selected from 3 disciplines: medicine and health sciences, computing, and social sciences. The findings were reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists were used to assess the quality of relevant studies. Data were collated and summarized, and results were reported qualitatively, adopting a narrative synthesis approach.

RESULTS

This review included 13 studies that examined open-source EHRs' adaptation and implementation in low- and lower-middle-income countries from 3 interrelated perspectives: socioenvironmental, technological, and organizational barriers. The studies identified key issues such as limited funding, sustainability, organizational and management challenges, infrastructure, data privacy and protection, and ownership. Data protection, confidentiality, ownership, and ethics emerged as important issues, often overshadowed by technical processes.

CONCLUSIONS

While open-source EHRs have the potential to enhance health care delivery in low- and lower-middle-income-country settings, implementation is fraught with difficulty. This scoping review shows that depending on the adopted perspective to implementation, different implementation barriers come into view. A dominant focus on technology distracts from socioenvironmental and organizational barriers impacting the proliferation of open-source EHRs. The role of local implementing organizations in addressing implementation barriers in low- and lower-middle-income countries remains unclear. A holistic understanding of implementers' experiences of implementation processes is needed. This could help characterize and solve implementation problems, including those related to ethics and the management of data protection. Nevertheless, this scoping review provides a meaningful contribution to the global health informatics discipline.

摘要

背景

低收入和中低收入国家在全球流行病和慢性病中所占比例较高。在大多数低收入和中低收入国家,获得医疗保健的机会有限。开源电子健康记录(EHR)的实施可被视为低收入和中低收入国家的有力推动因素,因为它可以改变医疗保健技术的提供方式。开源EHR可以通过改进为医疗保健提供、政策和规划提供信息所需的健康数据的收集、管理和分析,来加强低收入和中低收入国家的医疗保健服务。虽然开源EHR系统具有成本效益且适应性强,但它们在低收入和中低收入国家并未迅速普及。实施障碍减缓了采用速度,现有研究主要集中在阻碍成功实施的技术问题上。

目的

本跨学科范围综述旨在概述影响低收入和中低收入国家开源EHR系统适应和实施的背景障碍,并确定未来研究的领域。

方法

我们按照系统的方法框架进行了范围文献综述。从医学与健康科学、计算机科学和社会科学这3个学科中总共选择了7个数据库。研究结果按照PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和Meta分析扩展的范围综述的首选报告项目)清单进行报告。使用混合方法评估工具和批判性评估技能计划清单来评估相关研究的质量。对数据进行整理和总结,并采用叙述性综合方法定性报告结果。

结果

本综述纳入了13项研究,这些研究从社会环境、技术和组织障碍这3个相互关联的角度考察了开源EHR在低收入和中低收入国家的适应和实施情况。这些研究确定了一些关键问题,如资金有限、可持续性、组织和管理挑战、基础设施、数据隐私和保护以及所有权。数据保护、保密性、所有权和伦理成为重要问题,这些问题常常被技术流程所掩盖。

结论

虽然开源EHR有潜力加强低收入和中低收入国家的医疗保健服务,但实施充满困难。本范围综述表明,根据所采用的实施视角,会出现不同的实施障碍。对技术的主导关注分散了对影响开源EHR普及的社会环境和组织障碍的注意力。当地实施组织在解决低收入和中低收入国家实施障碍方面的作用仍不明确。需要对实施者在实施过程中的经验有全面的了解。这有助于描述和解决实施问题,包括与伦理和数据保护管理相关的问题。尽管如此,本范围综述为全球健康信息学学科做出了有意义的贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b406/11327637/b846a3b0f875/jmir_v26i1e45242_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b406/11327637/b846a3b0f875/jmir_v26i1e45242_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b406/11327637/b846a3b0f875/jmir_v26i1e45242_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Contextual Barriers to Implementing Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems for Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review.低收入和中低收入国家实施开源电子健康记录系统的背景障碍:范围审查
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 1;26:e45242. doi: 10.2196/45242.
2
25 Years of Electronic Health Record Implementation Processes: Scoping Review.电子健康记录实施流程25年:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e60077. doi: 10.2196/60077.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
A decade of designing and implementing electronic health records in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区十年电子健康记录设计与实施情况:一项范围综述
Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2492913. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2492913. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
5
Strategies and Tools for Electronic Health Records and Physician Workflow Alignment: Protocol for a Scoping Review.电子健康记录与医生工作流程协调的策略和工具:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 2;14:e60464. doi: 10.2196/60464.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Digital Health Policy and Programs for Hospital Care in Vietnam: Scoping Review.越南医院护理的数字健康政策和项目:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 9;24(2):e32392. doi: 10.2196/32392.
8
Experiences of Birth Attendants on Upward Obstetric Emergency Referrals in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Scoping Review.中低收入国家接生人员向上转诊产科急症的经验:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 10;14:e64886. doi: 10.2196/64886.
9
Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review.与受精神健康状况影响的人共享临床记录和电子健康记录:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 14;8(12):e34170. doi: 10.2196/34170.
10
Impact of social protection on gender equality in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of reviews.社会保护对低收入和中等收入国家性别平等的影响:一项综述的系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 May 25;18(2):e1240. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1240. eCollection 2022 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Technology to Support Health Care Providers Delivering Care in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Umbrella Review.利用技术支持低收入和中低收入国家的医疗保健提供者提供护理:系统综合评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 18;27:e66288. doi: 10.2196/66288.
2
Barriers to the implementation of large-scale electronic health record systems in primary healthcare centers: a mixed-methods study in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯初级医疗保健中心大规模电子健康记录系统实施的障碍:一项混合方法研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 15;12:1516714. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1516714. eCollection 2025.
3
Principles and implementation strategies for equitable and representative academic partnerships in global health informatics research.

本文引用的文献

1
Designing a Mobile Eye Hospital to Support Health Systems in Resource-Scarce Environments.设计移动眼科医院以支持资源匮乏环境中的卫生系统。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Aug;16(4):1618-1622. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.108. Epub 2021 May 14.
2
OpenMRS as a global good: Impact, opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned from fifteen years of implementation.OpenMRS 作为全球公益:十五年实施历程中的影响、机遇、挑战与经验教训。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 May;149:104405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104405. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
3
Development of an eHealth Readiness Assessment Framework for Botswana and Other Developing Countries: Interview Study.
全球卫生信息学研究中公平且具代表性的学术伙伴关系的原则与实施策略
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):958-963. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf015.
博茨瓦纳及其他发展中国家电子健康准备情况评估框架的制定:访谈研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Aug 22;7(3):e12949. doi: 10.2196/12949.
4
Comparison of Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems Based on Functional and User Performance Criteria.基于功能和用户性能标准的开源电子健康记录系统比较
Healthc Inform Res. 2019 Apr;25(2):89-98. doi: 10.4258/hir.2019.25.2.89. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
The role of electronic medical record in care delivery in developing countries.电子病历在发展中国家医疗服务中的作用。
Int J Inf Manage. 2008 Dec;28(6):503-507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.01.016. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
6
Kenyan health stakeholder views on individual consent, general notification and governance processes for the re-use of hospital inpatient data to support learning on healthcare systems.肯尼亚卫生利益相关者对重新使用医院住院数据以支持医疗系统学习的个人同意、一般通知和治理流程的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jan 8;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0343-9.
7
Barriers and facilitators to Electronic Medical Records usage in the Emergency Centre at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi-Ghana.加纳库马西Komfo Anokye教学医院急诊科电子病历使用的障碍与促进因素
Afr J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;7(4):177-182. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 25.
8
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?定性研究数据的主题分析:它有听起来那么简单吗?
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Jun;10(6):807-815. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
10
Implementing an Open Source Electronic Health Record System in Kenyan Health Care Facilities: Case Study.在肯尼亚医疗机构中实施开源电子健康记录系统:案例研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Apr 18;6(2):e22. doi: 10.2196/medinform.8403.