Smida Tanner, Price Bradley S, Mizener Alan, Crowe Remle P, Bardes James M
West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.
John Chambers School of Business and Economics, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2025;29(2):138-145. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2386445. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
The use of machine learning to identify patient 'clusters' using post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) vital signs may facilitate the identification of patient subgroups at high risk of rearrest and mortality. Our objective was to use k-means clustering to identify post-ROSC vital sign clusters and determine whether these clusters were associated with rearrest and mortality.
The ESO Data Collaborative 2018-2022 datasets were used for this study. We included adult, non-traumatic OHCA patients with >2 post-ROSC vital sign sets. Patients were excluded if they had an EMS-witnessed OHCA or were encountered during an interfacility transfer. Unsupervised (-means) clustering was performed using minimum, maximum, and delta (last minus first) systolic blood pressure (BP), heart rate, SpO, shock index, and pulse pressure. The assessed outcomes were mortality and rearrest. To explore the association between rearrest, mortality, and cluster, multivariable logistic regression modeling was used.
Within our cohort of 12,320 patients, five clusters were identified. Patients in cluster 1 were hypertensive, patients in cluster 2 were normotensive, patients in cluster 3 were hypotensive and tachycardic ( = 2164; 17.6%), patients in cluster 4 were hypoxemic and exhibited increasing systolic BP, and patients in cluster 5 were severely hypoxemic and exhibited a declining systolic BP. The overall proportion of patients who experienced mortality stratified by cluster was 63.4% (c1), 68.1% (c2), 78.8% (c3), 84.8% (c4), and 86.6% (c5). In comparison to the cluster with the lowest mortality (c1), each other cluster was associated with greater odds of mortality and rearrest.
Unsupervised k-means clustering yielded 5 post-ROSC vital sign clusters that were associated with rearrest and mortality.
利用机器学习通过自主循环恢复(ROSC)后的生命体征来识别患者“集群”,可能有助于识别有再次心脏骤停和死亡高风险的患者亚组。我们的目的是使用k均值聚类来识别ROSC后的生命体征集群,并确定这些集群是否与再次心脏骤停和死亡相关。
本研究使用了2018 - 2022年欧洲复苏委员会(ESO)数据协作组的数据集。我们纳入了成年非创伤性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者,且有超过2组ROSC后的生命体征数据。如果患者是由紧急医疗服务(EMS)见证的OHCA或在机构间转运过程中被接诊,则被排除。使用收缩压(BP)的最小值、最大值和差值(最后一次减去第一次)、心率、血氧饱和度(SpO)、休克指数和脉压进行无监督(k均值)聚类。评估的结局指标是死亡率和再次心脏骤停。为了探究再次心脏骤停、死亡率与集群之间的关联,使用了多变量逻辑回归模型。
在我们的12320例患者队列中,识别出了5个集群。集群1中的患者为高血压患者,集群2中的患者为血压正常患者,集群3中的患者为低血压且心动过速患者(n = 2164;17.6%),集群4中的患者为低氧血症患者且收缩压升高,集群5中的患者为严重低氧血症患者且收缩压下降。按集群分层的患者死亡率总体比例分别为63.4%(c1)、68.1%(c2)、78.8%(c3)、84.8%(c4)和86.6%(c5)。与死亡率最低的集群(c1)相比,其他每个集群发生死亡和再次心脏骤停的几率都更高。
无监督k均值聚类产生了5个与再次心脏骤停和死亡相关的ROSC后生命体征集群。