Eachempati Krishna K, Parameswaran Apurve, Ponnala Vinay K, Sunil Apsingi, Sheth Neil P
Department of Orthopaedics, Medicover Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Penn Orthopaedics at Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Aug 2;5(8):628-636. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.58.BJO-2024-0054.R1.
The aims of this study were: 1) to describe extended restricted kinematic alignment (E-rKA), a novel alignment strategy during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA); 2) to compare residual medial compartment tightness following virtual surgical planning during RA-TKA using mechanical alignment (MA) and E-rKA, in the same set of osteoarthritic varus knees; 3) to assess the requirement of soft-tissue releases during RA-TKA using E-rKA; and 4) to compare the accuracy of surgical plan execution between knees managed with adjustments in component positioning alone, and those which require additional soft-tissue releases.
Patients who underwent RA-TKA between January and December 2022 for primary varus osteoarthritis were included. Safe boundaries for E-rKA were defined. Residual medial compartment tightness was compared following virtual surgical planning using E-rKA and MA, in the same set of knees. Soft-tissue releases were documented. Errors in postoperative alignment in relation to planned alignment were compared between patients who did (group A) and did not (group B) require soft-tissue releases.
The use of E-rKA helped restore all knees within the predefined boundaries, with appropriate soft-tissue balancing. E-rKA compared with MA resulted in reduced residual medial tightness following surgical planning, in full extension (2.71 mm (SD 1.66) vs 5.16 mm (SD 3.10), respectively; p < 0.001), and 90° of flexion (2.52 mm (SD 1.63) vs 6.27 mm (SD 3.11), respectively; p < 0.001). Among the study population, 156 patients (78%) were managed with minor adjustments in component positioning alone, while 44 (22%) required additional soft-tissue releases. The mean errors in postoperative alignment were 0.53 mm and 0.26 mm among patients in group A and group B, respectively (p = 0.328).
E-rKA is an effective and reproducible alignment strategy during RA-TKA, permitting a large proportion of patients to be managed without soft-tissue releases. The execution of minor alterations in component positioning within predefined multiplanar boundaries is a better starting point for gap management than soft-tissue releases.
本研究的目的是:1)描述扩展受限运动学对线(E-rKA),这是一种在机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(RA-TKA)期间的新型对线策略;2)在同一组骨关节炎内翻膝关节中,比较RA-TKA期间使用机械对线(MA)和E-rKA进行虚拟手术规划后内侧间室的残余紧张度;3)评估RA-TKA期间使用E-rKA时软组织松解的必要性;4)比较仅通过调整假体位置进行处理的膝关节与需要额外软组织松解的膝关节之间手术计划执行的准确性。
纳入2022年1月至12月因原发性内翻骨关节炎接受RA-TKA的患者。定义了E-rKA的安全边界。在同一组膝关节中,比较使用E-rKA和MA进行虚拟手术规划后内侧间室的残余紧张度。记录软组织松解情况。比较需要(A组)和不需要(B组)软组织松解的患者术后对线与计划对线的误差。
使用E-rKA有助于在预定义边界内恢复所有膝关节,并实现适当的软组织平衡。与MA相比,E-rKA在手术规划后导致完全伸直时内侧残余紧张度降低(分别为2.71 mm(标准差1.66)和5.16 mm(标准差3.10);p < 0.001),屈曲9°时也降低(分别为2.52 mm(标准差1.63)和6.27 mm(标准差3.11);p < 0.001)。在研究人群中,156例患者(78%)仅通过轻微调整假体位置进行处理,而44例(22%)需要额外的软组织松解。A组和B组患者术后对线的平均误差分别为0.53 mm和0.26 mm(p = 0.328)。
E-rKA是RA-TKA期间一种有效且可重复的对线策略,使很大一部分患者无需进行软组织松解。在预定义的多平面边界内对假体位置进行微小改变的操作是比软组织松解更好的间隙管理起点。