• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于地表钻井数据的可解释的基于机器学习的当量循环密度预测

Explainable machine-learning-based prediction of equivalent circulating density using surface-based drilling data.

作者信息

Ekechukwu Gerald, Adejumo Abayomi

机构信息

Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA.

Oriental Energy Resources Limited, Lagos, Nigeria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 1;14(1):17780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66702-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-66702-w
PMID:39090185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11294553/
Abstract

When drilling wells for energy explorations, it is important to regulate the formation pressures appropriately to prevent kicks, which can lead to unimaginable loss of lives and properties. This is usually done by controlling the equivalent circulating density (ECD), which responds to the dynamic conditions that occur during drilling. The conventional approach to determine ECD is via mathematical modeling or downhole measurements. However, the downhole measurement tools can be very expensive, and the mathematical models do not provide a high degree of accuracy. Some previous authors have proposed using machine learning (ML) techniques to improve the degree of accuracy of the ECD predictions. In this work, we employed an extreme gradient-boosting (XGBoost) methodology to predict ECD values. The model's accuracy was determined using correlation coefficients (R) and root mean square errors (RMSE) as their performance metrics. The results showed a strong prediction capability with an R and RMSE of 1.00 and 0.0005 for the training data and an R and RMSE of 0.989 and 0.023 for the testing/blind data set, respectively. The developed model outperformed those obtained using other popular machine learning techniques. Lastly, an interpretation of the model results showed that mud weight, weight on hook, and standpipe pressure contributed the most to the ECD prediction values.

摘要

在为能源勘探钻井时,适当地调节地层压力以防止井涌非常重要,因为井涌可能导致难以想象的生命和财产损失。这通常通过控制当量循环密度(ECD)来实现,ECD会对钻井过程中出现的动态情况做出响应。确定ECD的传统方法是通过数学建模或井下测量。然而,井下测量工具可能非常昂贵,而且数学模型的准确性不高。一些先前的作者提出使用机器学习(ML)技术来提高ECD预测的准确性。在这项工作中,我们采用了极端梯度提升(XGBoost)方法来预测ECD值。使用相关系数(R)和均方根误差(RMSE)作为性能指标来确定模型的准确性。结果表明,该模型具有很强的预测能力,训练数据的R和RMSE分别为1.00和0.0005,测试/盲数据集的R和RMSE分别为0.989和0.023。所开发的模型优于使用其他流行机器学习技术获得的模型。最后,对模型结果的解释表明,泥浆比重、大钩悬重和立管压力对ECD预测值的贡献最大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/c36498aea363/41598_2024_66702_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/c2458e55b9c4/41598_2024_66702_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/78782b2fe113/41598_2024_66702_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/b5d3d0247eca/41598_2024_66702_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/2d23e4caca47/41598_2024_66702_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/d3d4d4f6994c/41598_2024_66702_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/af1d82e8d3aa/41598_2024_66702_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/c36498aea363/41598_2024_66702_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/c2458e55b9c4/41598_2024_66702_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/78782b2fe113/41598_2024_66702_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/b5d3d0247eca/41598_2024_66702_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/2d23e4caca47/41598_2024_66702_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/d3d4d4f6994c/41598_2024_66702_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/af1d82e8d3aa/41598_2024_66702_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b2/11294553/c36498aea363/41598_2024_66702_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Explainable machine-learning-based prediction of equivalent circulating density using surface-based drilling data.基于地表钻井数据的可解释的基于机器学习的当量循环密度预测
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 1;14(1):17780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66702-w.
2
Machine Learning Models for Equivalent Circulating Density Prediction from Drilling Data.基于钻井数据的等效循环密度预测的机器学习模型
ACS Omega. 2021 Oct 5;6(41):27430-27442. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c04363. eCollection 2021 Oct 19.
3
A Developed Robust Model and Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict Drilling Fluid Density and Equivalent Circulation Density in Real Time.开发了一种强大的模型和人工智能技术以实时预测钻井液密度和当量循环密度。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;23(14):6594. doi: 10.3390/s23146594.
4
Real-Time Prediction of Equivalent Circulation Density for Horizontal Wells Using Intelligent Machines.利用智能机器对水平井等效循环密度进行实时预测
ACS Omega. 2020 Dec 31;6(1):934-942. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05570. eCollection 2021 Jan 12.
5
Data-Driven Modeling Approach for Pore Pressure Gradient Prediction while Drilling from Drilling Parameters.基于钻井参数的随钻孔隙压力梯度预测的数据驱动建模方法
ACS Omega. 2021 May 19;6(21):13807-13816. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c01340. eCollection 2021 Jun 1.
6
Predicting the Tool Wear of a Drilling Process Using Novel Machine Learning XGBoost-SDA.使用新型机器学习XGBoost-SDA预测钻孔过程中的刀具磨损
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 4;13(21):4952. doi: 10.3390/ma13214952.
7
Hybrid machine learning approach for accurate prediction of the drilling rock index.用于精确预测岩石可钻性指数的混合机器学习方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 15;14(1):24080. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75639-z.
8
Explicit Data-Based Model for Predicting Oil-Based Mud Viscosity at Downhole Conditions.基于明确数据的井下条件下油基泥浆粘度预测模型。
ACS Omega. 2024 Jan 30;9(6):6684-6695. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c07815. eCollection 2024 Feb 13.
9
Detecting downhole vibrations through drilling horizontal sections: machine learning study.通过钻水平段检测井下振动:机器学习研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 17;13(1):6204. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33411-9.
10
Machine Learning Solution for Predicting Vibrations while Drilling the Curve Section.用于预测曲线段钻进时振动的机器学习解决方案。
ACS Omega. 2023 Sep 18;8(39):35822-35836. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c03413. eCollection 2023 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliable estimation via hybrid gradient boosting machine for mud loss volume in drilling operations.基于混合梯度提升机的钻井作业漏失量可靠估计
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 28;15(1):27525. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13008-0.
2
Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Modeling Equivalent Circulating Density for Improved Drilling Mud Management.用于改进钻井泥浆管理的等效循环密度建模的人工智能方法。
ACS Omega. 2025 Apr 28;10(18):19157-19174. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c02050. eCollection 2025 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
A Developed Robust Model and Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict Drilling Fluid Density and Equivalent Circulation Density in Real Time.开发了一种强大的模型和人工智能技术以实时预测钻井液密度和当量循环密度。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;23(14):6594. doi: 10.3390/s23146594.
2
Machine Learning Models for Equivalent Circulating Density Prediction from Drilling Data.基于钻井数据的等效循环密度预测的机器学习模型
ACS Omega. 2021 Oct 5;6(41):27430-27442. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c04363. eCollection 2021 Oct 19.
3
Well-scale demonstration of distributed pressure sensing using fiber-optic DAS and DTS.
使用光纤分布式声学传感(DAS)和分布式温度传感(DTS)对分布式压力传感进行良好规模的演示。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 14;11(1):12505. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91916-7.
4
Real-Time Prediction of Equivalent Circulation Density for Horizontal Wells Using Intelligent Machines.利用智能机器对水平井等效循环密度进行实时预测
ACS Omega. 2020 Dec 31;6(1):934-942. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05570. eCollection 2021 Jan 12.