• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型机器人(Maestro™)在腹腔镜手术中应用的可行性和安全性研究。

Feasibility and Safety Study of the Use of a New Robot (Maestro™) for Laparoscopic Surgery.

机构信息

Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire St Pierre, ULB, Brussels, Belgium.

CHU St Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3561-3568. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07409-9. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-024-07409-9
PMID:39090429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11349797/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In laparoscopic surgery, telerobotic systems such as Da Vinci™ were developed, among other things, to give back exposure and vision control to the operating surgeon. However, new limitations such as the separation of the operating surgeon from the operating table, cost, and size were unveiled. A new device, Maestro™, appears promising in addressing these limitations. The current work evaluates the feasibility, safety, and surgeon satisfaction with the assistance provided by the Maestro System.

METHODS

Non-consecutive patients who were candidates for laparoscopic digestive surgery were enrolled in a descriptive prospective, monocentric study. Case selection was solely based on the availability of the device, but not on the patient's characteristics. Surgery was performed by a leading surgeon with the help of one less experienced surgeon. Feasibility was defined by the maintenance of the initial surgical plan. Safety was assessed by the absence of serious adverse events related to the device and surgeon satisfaction was evaluated by a questionnaire following the intervention.

RESULTS

All 50 procedures were completed without conversion in laparotomy and without adjustment of the surgical team. Four complications were recorded during the study; however, none related to the use of the Maestro System. In 92% of the cases, the surgeon was satisfied with the assistance provided by the Maestro System.

CONCLUSIONS

In standard elective digestive procedures by laparoscopy, the use of the Maestro System is feasible and safe. It is beneficial to the surgeon and operative room organization by limiting the size of the surgical team.

摘要

背景

在腹腔镜手术中,开发了达芬奇等远程机器人系统,旨在将手术医生的暴露和视野控制交还给他们。然而,新的限制因素,如手术医生与手术台的分离、成本和设备尺寸等问题也随之出现。一种名为 Maestro 的新设备似乎有望解决这些限制。目前的工作评估了 Maestro 系统提供的辅助操作的可行性、安全性和手术医生的满意度。

方法

连续的候选接受腹腔镜消化手术的患者被纳入一项描述性前瞻性单中心研究。手术的选择仅基于设备的可用性,而不取决于患者的特征。手术由一名资深外科医生在一名经验较少的外科医生的协助下进行。可行性定义为维持初始手术计划。安全性通过没有与设备相关的严重不良事件来评估,手术医生满意度通过干预后的问卷调查来评估。

结果

所有 50 例手术均在无中转开腹和无手术团队调整的情况下完成。研究期间记录了 4 例并发症,但均与 Maestro 系统的使用无关。在 92%的情况下,手术医生对 Maestro 系统提供的辅助操作感到满意。

结论

在标准的腹腔镜择期消化手术中,Maestro 系统的使用是可行和安全的。它通过限制手术团队的规模,对手术医生和手术室组织有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d7/11349797/72423ceef9a6/11695_2024_7409_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d7/11349797/104220795d13/11695_2024_7409_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d7/11349797/72423ceef9a6/11695_2024_7409_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d7/11349797/104220795d13/11695_2024_7409_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d7/11349797/72423ceef9a6/11695_2024_7409_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility and Safety Study of the Use of a New Robot (Maestro™) for Laparoscopic Surgery.新型机器人(Maestro™)在腹腔镜手术中应用的可行性和安全性研究。
Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3561-3568. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07409-9. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
2
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
3
Interim safety analysis of the first-in-human clinical trial of the Versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery.Versius 手术系统人体首个人临床试验的中期安全性分析,Versius 手术系统是一种用于微创外科手术的新型机器人辅助设备。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5193-5202. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08014-4. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.机器人子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术:一项匹配病例对照研究的结局和成本分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
5
Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report.完全机器人辅助腹腔镜泌尿外科手术:初步报告。
J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Dec;181(6):552-7.
6
Robot-assisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a retrospective French multicentric study (2008-2019) using the Society of European Robotic Gynecological Surgery endometriosis database.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症:使用欧洲妇科机器人外科学会子宫内膜异位症数据库的回顾性法国多中心研究(2008-2019 年)。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Apr;305(4):1105-1113. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06414-6. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
7
Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的优势与局限:初步经验
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jan;19(1):117-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9004-9. Epub 2004 Nov 18.
8
Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?单对接机器人辅助腹腔镜经腹膜后入路肾下淋巴结清扫术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌:我们是否需要备用手术方案?
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):49-58. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0685-1. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
9
The da Vinci Xi system for robotic total/subtotal colectomy vs. conventional laparoscopy: short-term outcomes.达芬奇 Xi 系统机器人全结肠/次全结肠切除术与传统腹腔镜术:短期结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Sep;23(9):861-868. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02066-y. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
10
Laparoscopic versus full robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: retrospective, single-center study of the feasibility and short-term results.腹腔镜与全机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:可行性和短期结果的回顾性单中心研究。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):291-296. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00976-5. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

本文引用的文献

1
First human surgery using a surgical assistance robotics device for laparoscopic cholecystectomies.首例使用手术辅助机器人设备进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的人类手术。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7812-7818. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10296-3. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
2
Initial experience of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with Hugo™ RAS system: implications for surgical setting.使用雨果™机器人辅助手术系统进行机器人辅助部分肾切除术的初步经验:对手术环境的影响
World J Urol. 2023 Apr;41(4):1085-1091. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04336-9. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
Interim safety analysis of the first-in-human clinical trial of the Versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery.
Versius 手术系统人体首个人临床试验的中期安全性分析,Versius 手术系统是一种用于微创外科手术的新型机器人辅助设备。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5193-5202. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08014-4. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
From Da Vinci Si to Da Vinci Xi: realistic times in draping and docking the robot.从达芬奇Si到达芬奇Xi:机器人铺单与对接的实际操作时代
J Robot Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):835-839. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01057-8. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Cost of ownership assessment for a da Vinci robot based on US real-world data.基于美国真实世界数据的达芬奇机器人拥有成本评估。
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Oct;15(5):e2023. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2023. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
6
Advances in laparoscopic surgery in urology.腹腔镜泌尿外科手术进展。
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Jul;13(7):387-99. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.70. Epub 2016 May 24.
7
Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review.机器人辅助结直肠手术与腹腔镜手术和开放手术的疗效比较:一项系统评价
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):816-30. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2469-5. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
8
Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review.达芬奇机器人手术的经济学评价:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):598-606. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1936-2. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
9
The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.手术并发症的Clavien-Dindo分类:五年经验
Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
10
Late perforation of the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后空肠-空肠吻合口迟发性穿孔
Obes Surg. 2005 Jun-Jul;15(6):880-2. doi: 10.1381/0960892054222821.