Peralta Victor, Sánchez-Torres Ana M, Gil-Berrozpe Gustavo, de Jalón Elena García, Moreno-Izco Lucía, Peralta David, Janda Lucía, Cuesta Manuel J
Mental Health Department, Servicio Navarro de Salud, Pamplona, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;60(2):413-426. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02742-x. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
Little is known about the relationship between social exclusion and cognitive impairment in psychosis. We conducted a long-term cohort study of first-episode psychosis to examine the association between comprehensive measures of cognitive impairment and social exclusion assessed at follow-up.
A total of 173 subjects with first-episode psychosis were assessed after a 20-year follow-up for 7 cognitive domains and 12 social exclusion indicators. Associations between sets of variables were modeled using multivariate regression, where social exclusion indicators were the dependent variables, cognitive domains were the independent variables, and age, gender, and duration of follow-up were covariates.
The total scores on the measures of cognition and social exclusion were strongly associated (β = - .469, ∆R = 0.215). Participants with high social exclusion were 4.24 times more likely to have cognitive impairment than those with low social exclusion. Verbal learning was the cognitive function most related to social exclusion domains, and legal capacity was the exclusion domain that showed the strongest relationships with individual cognitive tests. Neurocognition uniquely contributed to housing, work activity, income, and educational attainment, whereas social cognition uniquely contributed to neighborhood deprivation, family and social contacts, and discrimination/stigma. Neurocognition explained more unique variance (11.5%) in social exclusion than social cognition (5.5%).
The domains of cognitive impairment were strongly and differentially related to those of social exclusion. Given that such an association pattern is likely bidirectional, a combined approach, both social and cognitive, is of paramount relevance in addressing the social exclusion experienced by individuals with psychotic disorders.
关于精神病中的社会排斥与认知障碍之间的关系,人们了解甚少。我们对首发精神病患者进行了一项长期队列研究,以检验随访时评估的认知障碍综合指标与社会排斥之间的关联。
对173名首发精神病患者进行了为期20年的随访,评估了7个认知领域和12个社会排斥指标。使用多元回归对变量集之间的关联进行建模,其中社会排斥指标为因变量,认知领域为自变量,年龄、性别和随访时间为协变量。
认知和社会排斥测量的总分密切相关(β = -0.469,∆R = 0.215)。社会排斥程度高的参与者出现认知障碍的可能性是社会排斥程度低的参与者的4.24倍。言语学习是与社会排斥领域最相关的认知功能,法律能力是与个体认知测试关系最密切的排斥领域。神经认知对住房、工作活动、收入和教育程度有独特影响,而社会认知对邻里剥夺、家庭和社会交往以及歧视/污名化有独特影响。神经认知在社会排斥中解释的独特方差(11.5%)比社会认知(5.5%)更多。
认知障碍领域与社会排斥领域密切相关且存在差异。鉴于这种关联模式可能是双向的,社会和认知相结合的方法对于解决精神病患者所经历的社会排斥至关重要。