Suppr超能文献

直肠-前列腺间隔物(ProSpace® 球囊)在前列腺癌放疗患者中的长期安全性评估。

Long-term evaluation of the safety of a rectal-prostate spacer, the ProSpace® balloon, in patients treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

机构信息

Oncologie Radiothérapie, Groupe Orion, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France.

Service d'Imagerie Médicale, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 1;24(1):934. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12692-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to the close proximity of the prostate and rectum, rectal toxicity remains a major problem in patient treated by radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma. One method of increasing the distance between the prostate and the rectum is to use a spacer implanted into the rectoprostatic space. This report describes the long-term outcomes obtained with a new ballon spacer.

METHODS

Patients treated with curative radiotherapy for low- or intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma, who underwent insertion of the ProSpace® (BioProtect Ltd, Tzur Yigal, Israel) rectal-prostate balloon spacer, were included. The main objective was to evaluate the dosimetric benefit of the spacer for OARs. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of ProSpace® balloon placement and to evaluate its long-term therapeutic efficacy and tolerance.

RESULTS

Between October 2013 and March 2015, 16 patients were enrolled in the Pasteur Clinic, Toulouse, France. The median follow-up was 85.5 months. From top to bottom, the space created was a mean of 16.3 mm (range: 11-20.5 mm) at the base of the prostate, 12.1 mm (range: 4-16 mm) at the middle and 8.9 mm at the apex (range: 5-15 mm). On average, rectal volumes receiving a dose of 70 Gy, 60 Gy and 50 Gy were significantly lower after balloon implantation: -4.81 cc (1.5 vs. 6.3; p < 0.0005), -8.08 cc (6.4 vs. 14.5; p = 0.002) and -9.06 cc (16.7 vs. 25.7; p = 0.003), respectively. There were significant differences in coverage after balloon implantation: Median V95% (p < 0.0005), median Dmin (p = 0.01) and median V98% (p < 0.001) were higher after balloon implantation. At 5 years, cumulative gastrointestinal toxicity was grade 1 in 6% (1/16 patients). No toxicity of grade 2 or higher was found. At 5 years, no urinary toxicity grade 3 or 4 toxicity was found. The QoL was not deteriorated.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the ProSpace® balloon seems to be well accepted by patients, allowing a double dosimetric gain: a decrease in doses received by the rectum and an improvement in the coverage of the high-risk PTV. The long-term gastrointestinal toxicity remains low and QoL is preserved in all treated patients.

摘要

背景

由于前列腺和直肠位置接近,直肠毒性仍然是接受前列腺腺癌放射治疗的患者的一个主要问题。增加前列腺和直肠之间距离的一种方法是使用植入直肠前列腺间隙的间隔物。本报告描述了使用新型球囊间隔物获得的长期结果。

方法

纳入了接受低危或中危前列腺腺癌根治性放疗并接受 ProSpace ® (BioProtect Ltd,Tzur Yigal,以色列)直肠前列腺球囊间隔物插入的患者。主要目的是评估间隔物对 OAR 的剂量学益处。次要目标是评估 ProSpace ® 球囊放置的可行性和耐受性,并评估其长期治疗效果和耐受性。

结果

2013 年 10 月至 2015 年 3 月,法国图卢兹巴斯德诊所纳入了 16 名患者。中位随访时间为 85.5 个月。从顶部到底部,前列腺底部的空间平均为 16.3 毫米(范围:11-20.5 毫米),中部为 12.1 毫米(范围:4-16 毫米),尖端为 8.9 毫米(范围:5-15 毫米)。球囊植入后,直肠接受 70Gy、60Gy 和 50Gy 剂量的体积明显降低:-4.81cc(1.5 与 6.3 相比;p<0.0005)、-8.08cc(6.4 与 14.5 相比;p=0.002)和-9.06cc(16.7 与 25.7 相比;p=0.003)。球囊植入后覆盖范围存在显著差异:中位 V95%(p<0.0005)、中位 Dmin(p=0.01)和中位 V98%(p<0.001)均升高。5 年时,累积胃肠道毒性为 1 级(1/16 例,6%)。未发现 2 级或更高级别的毒性。5 年时,未发现 3 级或 4 级尿毒性。生活质量没有恶化。

结论

ProSpace ® 球囊的使用似乎被患者很好地接受,可带来双重剂量学获益:直肠接受剂量减少和高危 PTV 覆盖改善。长期胃肠道毒性仍然较低,所有接受治疗的患者的生活质量均得到保留。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5003/11292989/27076c574619/12885_2024_12692_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验