Zeganadin Lionel, Lopez-Castroman Jorge, Auriacombe Marc, Luquiens Amandine
Department of Addictology, CHU Nîmes, Univ Montpellier, Nîmes, France.
CH de Sète, Sète, France.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024 Sep;48(9):1637-1656. doi: 10.1111/acer.15409. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
Craving is considered one of the defining characteristics for alcohol or substance use disorders. There is no consensus on the underlying processes of craving, although multiple models exist. Craving is a very individualistic symptom and has to be self-reported. Several instruments have been developed to measure craving, without a recognized gold standard. The patient's perspective appears critical to determine the relevance of the numerous existing tools. We assessed the contribution of patients to the development of these instruments. We performed a systematic review of instruments measuring alcohol craving published from 2012 to 2023 from three databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, and Embase) in addition to those identified in a previous review by Kavanagh et al. from 1990 to 2012. We included all articles related to the development or validation of instruments for the assessment of alcohol craving. We identified and included in this review the corresponding instruments. Articles translating existing instruments without validation or on single-item instruments were excluded. We analyzed the articles in accordance with COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) recommendations to assess patient involvement in the creation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). Two key aspects were investigated: (1) the general design, encompassing the quality of construct description, identification of elements pertinent to a PROM, particularly the inclusion of concepts provided by patients, and (2) the quality of cognitive interviews (when conducted), to evaluate the comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of the PROM. We included 22 articles identifying 16 instruments for measuring alcohol craving. Patients only contributed to item development for one instrument and its short version (QAU and AUQ). None of the instruments met all of the developmental quality criteria, with 14 classed as "inadequate" and two as "doubtful." The current instruments measuring alcohol craving were developed with poor patient contribution, although most articles did not adequately report patient involvement. Patients' perspectives on craving should be explored for future patient-centered approach.
渴望被认为是酒精或物质使用障碍的决定性特征之一。尽管存在多种模型,但对于渴望的潜在过程尚无共识。渴望是一种非常个体化的症状,必须通过自我报告。已经开发了几种工具来测量渴望,但没有公认的金标准。患者的观点对于确定众多现有工具的相关性似乎至关重要。我们评估了患者对这些工具开发的贡献。我们除了对卡瓦纳等人1990年至2012年的先前综述中确定的那些工具外,还对2012年至2023年从三个数据库(PubMed、PsycInfo和Embase)发表的测量酒精渴望的工具进行了系统综述。我们纳入了所有与评估酒精渴望工具的开发或验证相关的文章。我们识别并将相应的工具纳入本综述。未经验证或关于单项工具的翻译现有工具的文章被排除。我们根据基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)建议分析文章,以评估患者在创建患者报告结局测量(PROM)中的参与情况。研究了两个关键方面:(1)总体设计,包括构念描述的质量、与PROM相关元素的识别,特别是患者提供的概念的纳入,以及(2)认知访谈的质量(如果进行),以评估PROM的全面性和可理解性。我们纳入了22篇文章,确定了16种测量酒精渴望的工具。患者仅对一种工具及其简短版本(QAU和AUQ)的项目开发做出了贡献。没有一种工具符合所有的开发质量标准,14种被归类为“不足”,两种被归类为“可疑”。目前测量酒精渴望的工具在开发过程中患者参与度较低,尽管大多数文章没有充分报告患者的参与情况。未来应以患者为中心的方法探索患者对渴望的看法。