Frumento Sergio, Preatoni Greta, Chee Lauren, Gemignani Angelo, Ciotti Federico, Menicucci Danilo, Raspopovic Stanisa
Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Laboratory for Neuroengineering, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 18;15:1396946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1396946. eCollection 2024.
The prevailing theories of consciousness consider the integration of different sensory stimuli as a key component for this phenomenon to rise on the brain level. Despite many theories and models have been proposed for multisensory integration between supraliminal stimuli (e.g., the optimal integration model), we do not know if multisensory integration occurs also for subliminal stimuli and what psychophysical mechanisms it follows.
To investigate this, subjects were exposed to visual (Virtual Reality) and/or haptic stimuli (Electro-Cutaneous Stimulation) above or below their perceptual threshold. They had to discriminate, in a two-Alternative Forced Choice Task, the intensity of unimodal and/or bimodal stimuli. They were then asked to discriminate the sensory modality while recording their EEG responses.
We found evidence of multisensory integration for supraliminal condition, following the classical optimal model. Importantly, even for subliminal trials participant's performances in the bimodal condition were significantly more accurate when discriminating the intensity of the stimulation. Moreover, significant differences emerged between unimodal and bimodal activity templates in parieto-temporal areas known for their integrative role.
These converging evidences - even if preliminary and needing confirmation from the collection of further data - suggest that subliminal multimodal stimuli can be integrated, thus filling a meaningful gap in the debate about the relationship between consciousness and multisensory integration.
意识的主流理论认为,不同感官刺激的整合是这种现象在大脑层面出现的关键组成部分。尽管已经提出了许多关于阈上刺激之间多感官整合的理论和模型(例如,最优整合模型),但我们不知道阈下刺激是否也会发生多感官整合,以及它遵循何种心理物理机制。
为了研究这一问题,让受试者暴露于高于或低于其感知阈值的视觉(虚拟现实)和/或触觉刺激(皮肤电刺激)下。在二选一强制选择任务中,他们必须辨别单峰和/或双峰刺激的强度。然后要求他们在记录脑电图反应的同时辨别感觉模态。
我们发现,在阈上条件下存在多感官整合的证据,遵循经典的最优模型。重要的是,即使在阈下试验中,参与者在双峰条件下辨别刺激强度时的表现也明显更准确。此外,在以整合作用而闻名的顶颞区域,单峰和双峰活动模板之间出现了显著差异。
这些相互印证的证据——尽管是初步的,需要进一步数据收集的证实——表明阈下多模态刺激可以被整合,从而填补了关于意识与多感官整合之间关系的争论中一个有意义的空白。