• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新思考可塑性:从神经科学定义的角度分析“破坏性可塑性”的概念。

Rethinking plasticity: Analysing the concept of "destructive plasticity" in the light of neuroscience definitions.

机构信息

Institut des Sciences du Mouvement: Etienne-Jules MAREY (ISM), CNRS, Aix Marseille Univ, UMR 7287, Campus Scientifique de Luminy, Marseille Cedex 09, France.

Institute of NeuroPhysiopathology (INP), CNRS, Aix Marseille University, UMR 7051, Marseille Cedex 5, France.

出版信息

Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Sep;60(5):4798-4812. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16487. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1111/ejn.16487
PMID:39092545
Abstract

As a multilevel and multidisciplinary field, neuroscience is designed to interact with various branches of natural and applied sciences as well as with humanities and philosophy. The continental tradition in philosophy, particularly over the past 20 years, tended to establish strong connections with biology and neuroscience findings. This cross fertilization can however be impeded by conceptual intricacies, such as those surrounding the concept of plasticity. The use of this concept has broadened as scientists applied it to explore an ever-growing range of biological phenomena. Here, we examine the consequences of this ambiguity in an interdisciplinary context through the analysis of the concept of "destructive plasticity" in the philosophical writings of Catherine Malabou. The term "destructive plasticity" was coined by Malabou in 2009 to refer to all processes leading to psycho-cognitive and emotional alterations following traumatic or nontraumatic brain injuries or resulting from neurodevelopmental disorders. By comparing it with the neuroscientific definitions of plasticity, we discuss the epistemological obstacles and possibilities related to the integration of this concept into neuroscience. Improving interdisciplinary exchanges requires an advanced and sophisticated manipulation of neurobiological concepts. These concepts are not only intended to guide research programmes within neuroscience but also to organize and frame the dialogue between different theoretical backgrounds.

摘要

作为一个多层次和多学科的领域,神经科学旨在与自然科学和应用科学的各个分支以及人文科学和哲学相互作用。哲学的大陆传统,特别是在过去的 20 年中,往往与生物学和神经科学的发现建立了紧密的联系。然而,这种交叉授粉可能会受到概念上的复杂性的阻碍,例如围绕可塑性概念的复杂性。随着科学家们将其应用于探索越来越多的生物现象,这个概念的使用范围已经扩大。在这里,我们通过分析凯瑟琳·马拉布(Catherine Malabou)的哲学著作中“破坏性可塑性”的概念,在跨学科背景下考察了这种模糊性的后果。“破坏性可塑性”一词是由马拉布(Malabou)在 2009 年创造的,用于指所有导致心理认知和情绪改变的过程,这些改变是由创伤性或非创伤性脑损伤引起的,或者是由神经发育障碍引起的。通过将其与神经科学中可塑性的定义进行比较,我们讨论了将这个概念纳入神经科学中所涉及的认识论障碍和可能性。要改善跨学科交流,就需要对神经生物学概念进行高级和复杂的操作。这些概念不仅旨在指导神经科学内部的研究计划,而且还旨在组织和构建不同理论背景之间的对话。

相似文献

1
Rethinking plasticity: Analysing the concept of "destructive plasticity" in the light of neuroscience definitions.重新思考可塑性:从神经科学定义的角度分析“破坏性可塑性”的概念。
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Sep;60(5):4798-4812. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16487. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
2
The digital twin in neuroscience: from theory to tailored therapy.神经科学中的数字孪生:从理论到个性化治疗
Front Neurosci. 2024 Sep 17;18:1454856. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1454856. eCollection 2024.
3
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
4
Early adversity and mechanisms of plasticity: integrating affective neuroscience with developmental approaches to psychopathology.早期逆境与可塑性机制:将情感神经科学与精神病理学的发展方法相结合
Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Summer;17(3):735-52. doi: 10.1017/S0954579405050352.
5
Naming our concerns about neuroscience: a review of Bennett and Hacker's philosophical foundations of neuroscience.阐明我们对神经科学的担忧:评贝内特与哈克的《神经科学的哲学基础》
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Nov;84(3):683-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.83-05.
6
The mind-brain gap and the neuroscience-psychiatry gap.心-脑鸿沟和神经科学-精神病学鸿沟。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;24(4):797-802. doi: 10.1111/jep.12891. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
7
Plasticity imbalance in mental disorders the neuroscience of psychiatry: implications for diagnosis and research.精神障碍中的可塑性失衡:精神病学的神经科学,对诊断和研究的启示
Med Hypotheses. 2005;65(5):947-52. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.05.007.
8
The structure of non-human cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critique.非人类认知神经科学的结构:一种认识论批判。
Rev Neurosci. 2019 Nov 26;30(8):881-888. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2019-0006.
9
The brain-artefact interface (BAI): a challenge for archaeology and cultural neuroscience.脑-人工制品界面(BAI):考古学和文化神经科学的挑战。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Jun;5(2-3):264-73. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp057.
10
Metaplasticity and the human becoming: principles of neuroarchaeology.可塑性变化与人类成长:神经考古学原理
J Anthropol Sci. 2010;88:49-72.