University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Dec;25(5):3903-3922. doi: 10.1177/15248380241265382. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
Recently, post-secondary institutions have been under increased public and academic scrutiny regarding their ability to prevent and respond to instances of campus sexual violence. Emerging research has explored (IB), which is a theoretical framework that states that actions and inactions on the part of the institution can cause further harm to survivors of violence. The goals of this review were, using an ecological systems lens, to identify what specific behaviors, policies, responses, and other factors constitute IB or institutional support (IS) as defined by the existing literature. A search of 16 databases across 8 disciplines led to the identification of 100 articles that mentioned either IB or IS verbatim. Factors that can be categorized as IB and IS were identified across nine levels: (1) the individual level, (2) the interpersonal level, (3) within institutional spaces, (4) within institutional procedures, (5) within institutional policies, (6) at the institutional structural level, (7) at the institutional culture level, (8) at a government and public policy level, and (9) within greater societal cultural values and established social norms. IB itself manifests across all levels of the institution and is, in fact, quite insidious-it is largely invisible and deeply rooted in systemic oppression, woven into the structure of institutions of higher education. IB remains a looming, almost inevitable outcome of the structural violence that occurs in post-secondary settings. Yet, IS and the related concept of institutional courage are emerging fields of study that pose important implications for institutional change.
最近,高等教育机构因其预防和应对校园性暴力事件的能力而受到越来越多的公众和学术界的审查。新兴研究探讨了机构间暴力(IB),这是一种理论框架,指出机构的行动和不作为可能会对暴力幸存者造成进一步的伤害。本综述的目的是,从生态系统的角度出发,确定哪些具体的行为、政策、反应和其他因素构成了现有的文献中定义的机构间暴力(IB)或机构支持(IS)。对 8 个学科的 16 个数据库进行了搜索,共确定了 100 篇提到 IB 或 IS 的文章。可以归类为 IB 和 IS 的因素在九个层面上得到了识别:(1)个人层面,(2)人际层面,(3)机构内部空间,(4)机构程序内,(5)机构政策内,(6)机构结构层面,(7)机构文化层面,(8)政府和公共政策层面,以及(9)更广泛的社会文化价值观和既定的社会规范。IB 本身存在于机构的所有层面,实际上是非常阴险的——它在很大程度上是无形的,深深植根于系统性压迫之中,融入了高等教育机构的结构之中。IB 仍然是高等教育机构中发生的结构性暴力的一个潜在的、几乎不可避免的结果。然而,IS 以及相关的机构勇气概念是新兴的研究领域,对机构变革提出了重要的影响。