Department of Operating Room, Haikou Affiliated Hospital of Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine, Haikou, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, Haikou Affiliated Hospital of Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine, Haikou, China.
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(6):4661-4670. doi: 10.3233/THC-240906.
The conventional round suture needle poses a significant risk of needle stick injuries among surgical physicians, identified as a global occupational hazard by the World Health Organization, increasing hospital costs and exposure to bloodborne pathogens. While novel blunt suture needles have shown promise in reducing these risks, their adoption is limited domestically, prompting a study to compare their efficacy against traditional sharp needles in reducing needle stick injuries among surgical physicians.
To investigate suture needle stick injuries among surgical doctors during operations and assess the application effectiveness of a novel blunt suture needle.
A total of 106 surgical department physicians from March 2021 to February 2023 participated in the study. After completing a questionnaire survey on suture needle injuries during surgery, the participants were divided into two groups. Over a 6-month intervention period, the control group used regular round needles while the study group utilized novel blunt suture needles. Subsequently, suture needle injury incidence rates and economic hygiene benefits were compared between the two groups.
The suture needle injury questionnaire survey showed that over the past 6 months, among 106 surgical department physicians, 20 needle stick injuries occurred, yielding an incidence rate of 18.87%. The highest incidence (65.00%) was during suturing incisions longer than 10 cm, primarily when visibility was poor (70.00%). Surgeons linked most injuries (60.00%) to prolonged surgical duration causing fatigue. Although 85.00% detected injuries within 1 minute, only 40.00% were reported, often due to perceived reporting complexity. Following intervention, the study group had significantly fewer injuries per surgery and lower occupational exposure costs compared to the control group (p< 0.05).
Surgical department physicians commonly sustain suture needle injuries while suturing incisions of 5-10 cm length under poor visibility, exacerbated by prolonged surgical duration. Despite detecting most injuries within 1 minute, only 40% are reported. The implementation of novel blunt suture needles significantly decreases injury rates, resulting in reduced occupational exposure costs and favorable safety and economic hygiene outcomes.
传统的圆缝线针在外科医生中造成了显著的针刺伤风险,这被世界卫生组织认定为一种全球性职业危害,增加了医院成本和暴露于血源性病原体的风险。虽然新型钝缝线针已显示出降低这些风险的潜力,但在国内的采用受到限制,因此进行了一项研究,比较它们在减少外科医生针刺伤方面的效果与传统的锐缝线针。
调查外科医生在手术过程中的缝线针刺伤情况,并评估新型钝缝线针的应用效果。
共有 106 名来自 2021 年 3 月至 2023 年 2 月的外科医生参与了这项研究。在完成手术中缝线针损伤的问卷调查后,将参与者分为两组。在 6 个月的干预期间,对照组使用常规圆缝线针,而研究组使用新型钝缝线针。随后,比较两组的缝线针损伤发生率和经济卫生效益。
缝线针损伤问卷调查显示,在过去的 6 个月中,106 名外科医生中有 20 名发生了针刺伤,发生率为 18.87%。最高的发生率(65.00%)发生在缝合长度超过 10 厘米的切口时,主要是在可视性差(70.00%)的情况下。外科医生将大多数损伤(60.00%)归因于手术时间延长导致的疲劳。尽管 85.00%的人在 1 分钟内发现了损伤,但只有 40.00%的人报告了损伤,这通常是由于认为报告复杂所致。干预后,研究组每例手术的损伤次数明显少于对照组,职业暴露成本也低于对照组(p<0.05)。
外科医生在缝合 5-10 厘米长度、可视性差的切口时,经常发生缝线针刺伤,手术时间延长会加重这种情况。尽管大多数损伤在 1 分钟内被发现,但只有 40%的损伤被报告。使用新型钝缝线针可显著降低损伤发生率,从而降低职业暴露成本,并带来良好的安全和经济卫生效益。