Lee T K, Rothberger H
Scand J Rheumatol. 1985;14(4):386-92. doi: 10.3109/03009748509102043.
In studies on 779 fresh, unselected ANA+ sera, 50 (6.4%) were found to have anti-dsDNA antibodies, by using CIP (C. luciliae immunoperoxidase), and 84% of the 50 patients met the criteria for definite SLE. After freezing 36 of these sera for 13 +/- 1 months, only 52.8% were again positive by CIP. Using CIF (C. luciliae immunofluorescence), 16.7% and 52.8% of the same stored sera were anti-dsDNA+, with transmitted and epi-illumination, respectively. We favour CIP to CIF because: slide files are permanent, overcoming any lability of antibodies in frozen sera; kinetoplast, flagellum and nucleus are easily distinguished; perikinetoplast staining is avoided; specialized microscopic equipment is not needed.
在对779份未经挑选的新鲜ANA阳性血清进行的研究中,通过使用CIP(绿蝇短膜虫免疫过氧化物酶法)发现,50份(6.4%)血清含有抗双链DNA抗体,这50名患者中有84%符合明确系统性红斑狼疮的标准。在将其中36份血清冷冻13±1个月后,通过CIP检测,只有52.8%的血清再次呈阳性。使用CIF(绿蝇短膜虫免疫荧光法)检测,在透射光和落射光下,相同储存血清中分别有16.7%和52.8%的血清抗双链DNA呈阳性。我们更倾向于使用CIP而非CIF,原因如下:载玻片档案是永久性的,克服了冷冻血清中抗体的任何不稳定性;动基体、鞭毛和细胞核易于区分;避免了动基体周围染色;不需要专门的显微镜设备。