Suppr超能文献

碳同位素比值作为添加糖摄入量的客观生物标志物:人类营养中当前证据的范围综述。

The Carbon Isotope Ratio as an Objective Biomarker of Added Sugar Intake: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence in Human Nutrition.

机构信息

Center for Obesity Research and Education, Temple University, PA, United States; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, PA, United States.

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, PA, United States.

出版信息

Adv Nutr. 2024 Sep;15(9):100281. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100281. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Abstract

Objective biomarkers of dietary intake are needed to advance nutrition research. The carbon isotope ratio (C/C; CIR) holds promise as an objective biomarker of added sugar (AS) and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake. This systematic scoping review presents the current evidence on CIRs from human studies. Search results (through April 12, 2024) yielded 6297 studies and 24 final articles. Studies were observational (n = 12), controlled feeding (n = 10), or dietary interventions (n = 2). CIRs were sampled from blood (n = 23), hair (n = 5), breath (n = 2), and/or adipose tissue (n = 1). Most (n = 17) conducted whole tissue (that is, bulk) analysis, 8 used compound specific isotope analysis (CSIA), and/or 2 studies used methods appropriate for analyzing breath. Studies were conducted in 3 concentrated geographic regions of the United States (n = 7 Virginia; n = 5 Arizona; n = 4 Alaska), with only 2 studies conducted in other countries. Studies that used CSIA to examine the CIR from the amino acid alanine (CIR-Ala; n = 4) and CIR analyzed from breath (n = 2) provided the most robust evidence for CIR as an objective biomarker of AS and SSBs (R range 0.36-0.91). Studies using bulk analysis of hair or blood showed positive, but modest and more variable associations with AS and SSBs (R range 0.05-0.48). Few studies showed no association, particularly in non-United States populations and those with low AS and SSB intakes. Two studies provided evidence for CIR to detect changes in SSB intake in response to dietary interventions. Overall, the most compelling evidence supports CIR-Ala as an objective indicator of AS intake and breath CIR as an indicator of short-term AS intake. Considering how to adjust for underlying dietary patterns remains an important area of future work and emerging methods using breath and CSIA warrant additional investigation. More evidence is needed to refine the utility and specificity of CIRs to measure AS and SSB intake.

摘要

需要客观的饮食摄入生物标志物来推进营养研究。碳同位素比 (C/C; CIR) 有望成为添加糖 (AS) 和含糖饮料 (SSB) 摄入的客观生物标志物。本系统范围综述介绍了目前关于人类研究中 CIR 的证据。搜索结果(截至 2024 年 4 月 12 日)产生了 6297 项研究和 24 篇最终文章。这些研究是观察性的(n = 12)、对照喂养的(n = 10)或饮食干预的(n = 2)。CIR 从血液(n = 23)、头发(n = 5)、呼吸(n = 2)和/或脂肪组织(n = 1)中进行采样。大多数(n = 17)进行了全组织(即整体)分析,8 项研究使用了化合物特异性同位素分析(CSIA),还有 2 项研究使用了适用于分析呼吸的方法。这些研究集中在美国的 3 个地区(弗吉尼亚州 n = 7;亚利桑那州 n = 5;阿拉斯加州 n = 4)进行,只有 2 项研究在其他国家进行。使用 CSIA 研究氨基酸丙氨酸的 CIR(CIR-Ala;n = 4)和呼吸中的 CIR(n = 2)的研究提供了 CIR 作为 AS 和 SSBs 的客观生物标志物的最有力证据(R 范围为 0.36-0.91)。使用头发或血液的整体分析的研究显示出与 AS 和 SSBs 呈正相关,但适度且更具变异性(R 范围为 0.05-0.48)。很少有研究表明没有关联,特别是在非美国人群中和 AS 和 SSB 摄入量较低的人群中。两项研究提供了证据表明,CIR 可用于检测饮食干预对 SSB 摄入量的变化。总体而言,最有说服力的证据支持 CIR-Ala 作为 AS 摄入量的客观指标,以及呼吸 CIR 作为短期 AS 摄入量的指标。考虑如何调整潜在的饮食模式仍然是未来工作的一个重要领域,新兴的使用呼吸和 CSIA 的方法值得进一步研究。需要更多的证据来完善 CIR 测量 AS 和 SSB 摄入量的实用性和特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e15/11406090/2ed1a54fffed/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验